Literature DB >> 7777305

Corneal topography of phase III excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Optical zone centration analysis. Summit Photorefractive Keratectomy Topography Study Group.

B H Schwartz-Goldstein1, P S Hersh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the amount of optical zone decentration in patients who have undergone excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and assess associations of both decentration and optical zone size with clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Optical zone centration in 185 patients after PRK was analyzed using computer-assisted videokeratography. A comparison of decentration among the five study centers was performed. Associations of clinical outcomes with procedure decentration and optical zone size were assessed.
RESULTS: Decentration from the pupil center ranged from 0.00 to 1.44 mm (mean, 0.46 mm): 21.8% were decentered 0.25 mm or less, 42.5% > 0.25 mm and < or = 0.50 mm, and 97.1% < or = 1.00 mm. In both eyes, the average decentration from the pupil center was located inferonasally. Decentrations among the five study centers were significantly different. Decentration was associated with attempted refractive correction, change in keratometric cylinder, and patient satisfaction. There was a trend toward worse postoperative uncorrected visual acuity with greater decentration but no association with best-corrected vision, predictability, or refractive astigmatism. No significant relation was found between decentration and glare/halo ranking; however, three of six patients with 1.00 mm or greater of decentration demonstrated a high glare/halo grade. Although optical zone size was not associated with glare or halo, subjective patient satisfaction was greater with a 5.0-mm optical zone than with a 4.5-mm optical zone.
CONCLUSIONS: Centration is an important surgeon-controlled variable in excimer laser PRK. Decentration of excimer laser refractive procedures was found to be nonrandom and may be influenced by preoperative pupil management. Moreover, the amount of decentration may influence clinical outcomes. Improved techniques and centering procedures on nonmiotic pupils may improve future results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7777305     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30928-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  5 in total

1.  [Pupil centroid shift: Marketing tool or essential clinical parameter?].

Authors:  I Fischinger; T G Seiler; G Schmidinger; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Optics of conductive keratoplasty: implications for presbyopia management.

Authors:  Peter S Hersh
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

3.  Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group.

Authors:  R F Steinert; P S Hersh
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1998

4.  The measurement of patient-reported outcomes of refractive surgery: the refractive status and vision profile.

Authors:  O D Schein
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2000

5.  Photorefractive keratectomy for anisometropic amblyopia in children.

Authors:  Evelyn A Paysse
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.