Literature DB >> 22914393

Extended embryo culture and an increased risk of preterm delivery.

Suleena Kansal Kalra1, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Kurt T Barnhart, Christos Coutifaris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether extended embryo culture is associated with preterm delivery, very preterm delivery, low birth weight, or a combination of these in neonates conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF).
METHODS: U.S. IVF live births were identified using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technologies database (2004-2006). Associations were assessed in neonates born after extended embryo culture (day 5 to 6) as compared with cleavage-stage transfer (day 3). Analyses were stratified by singleton and twin birth. Subanalyses in neonates born to oocyte donation recipients and primiparous patients were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 69,039 live births were identified; 46,288 neonates were born after cleavage-stage embryo transfer and 22,751 neonates after blastocyst transfer. Singleton IVF births conceived after blastocyst transfer, as compared with cleavage-stage transfer, were at an increased risk for preterm delivery (18.6% compared with 14.4%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.39, P<.001) and very preterm delivery (2.8% compared with 2.2%, respectively; adjusted OR 1.35, P<.001), but not low birth weight (10.3% compared with 9.1%, respectively; adjusted OR 1.10, P=.06). Findings remained robust in subanalyses. In twin births, adverse outcome was more prevalent in both groups and an association of blastocyst transfer was noted for preterm delivery (67.3% compared with 60.5%; adjusted OR 1.81, P<.001) very preterm delivery (adjusted OR 14.0% compared with 12.0%; adjusted OR 1.75, P<.001), and low birth weight (71.1% compared with 68.6%, adjusted OR 1.19, P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Extended culture of embryos from cleavage stage to blastocyst stage increases the risk of preterm delivery. Unless blastocyst transfer results in a reduction in multiple births, it may be contributing to the perinatal morbidity associated with IVF-assisted conception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22914393     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825b88fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  31 in total

Review 1.  A Molecular Perspective on Procedures and Outcomes with Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Monica A Mainigi; Carmen Sapienza; Samantha Butts; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Natural cycle IVF reduces the risk of low birthweight infants compared with conventional stimulated IVF.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Laxmi A Kondapalli; Gerard Celia; John Gordon; Michael DiMattina; Mark Payson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Effect of single embryo transfer on the risk of preterm birth associated with in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Adam J Fechner; Kelecia R Brown; Ndidiamaka Onwubalili; Sangita K Jindal; Gerson Weiss; Laura T Goldsmith; Peter G McGovern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Giannelou; S Grigoriadis; A Pantou; K Nikolettos; N Vlahos; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Epigenetic changes in preterm birth placenta suggest a role for ADAMTS genes in spontaneous preterm birth.

Authors:  Sneha Mani; Jayashri Ghosh; Yemin Lan; Suneeta Senapati; Teri Ord; Carmen Sapienza; Christos Coutifaris; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?

Authors:  Susan M Maxwell; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Salim Daya; Phill Matson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-12-14

Review 8.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The superovulated environment, independent of embryo vitrification, results in low birthweight in a mouse model.

Authors:  Rachel Weinerman; Teri Ord; Marisa S Bartolomei; Christos Coutifaris; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: interrogating the association.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.