Literature DB >> 29502189

A predictive model for high-quality blastocyst based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry.

Cheng-He Yu1,2, Ruo-Peng Zhang2, Juan Li3, Zhou-Cun A4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to create a predictive model for high-quality blastocyst progression based on the traditional morphology parameters of embryos.
METHODS: A total of 1564 embryos from 234 women underwent conventional in vitro fertilization and were involved in the present study. High-quality blastocysts were defined as having a grade of at least 3BB, and all embryos were divided based on the development of high-quality blastocysts (group HQ) or the failure to develop high-quality blastocysts (group NHQ). A retrospective analysis of day-3 embryo parameters, focused on blastomere number, fragmentation, the presence of a vacuole, symmetry, and the presence of multinucleated blastomeres was conducted.
RESULTS: All parameters were related to high-quality blastocysts (p < 0001) in t tests, chi-square tests, or Fisher tests. The individual scores for all parameters were determined according to their distributions and corresponding rates of forming high-quality blastocysts. Parameters are indicated by s_bn (blastomere number), s_f (fragmentation), s_pv (presence of a vacuole), s_s (symmetry), and s_MNB (multinucleated blastomeres). Subsequently, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore their relationship. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a predictive model was constructed, and a parameter Hc was created based on the s_bn, s_f, and s_s parameters and their corresponding odds ratios. The value of Hc in group HQ was significantly higher than that in group NHQ. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to test the effectiveness of the model. An area under the curve of 0.790, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.766-0.813, was calculated. A dataset was used to validate the predictive utility of the model. Moreover, another dataset was used to ensure that the model can be applied to predict the implantation of day-3 embryos.
CONCLUSIONS: A predictive model for high-quality blastocysts was created based on blastomere number, fragmentation, and symmetry. This model provides novel information on the selection of potential embryos.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; Embryo development; Embryo evaluation; In vitro fertilization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502189      PMCID: PMC5984880          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1132-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  25 in total

1.  Standardization of grading embryo morphology.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Michael Vernon; Jacob Mayer; G David Ball; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; David Wininger; William Gibbons; Joseph Conaghan; Judy E Stern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst stage transfer comparing to early cleavage stage embryo transfer.

Authors:  Elham Aziminekoo; Maryam Sadat Mohseni Salehi; Vahid Kalantari; Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad; Fedyeh Haghollahi; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Zahra Zandieh
Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.260

3.  Patient selection criteria for blastocyst culture in IVF/ICSI treatment.

Authors:  M Y Thum; V Wells; H Abdalla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Clinical outcomes of elective single morula embryo transfer versus elective single blastocyst embryo transfer in IVF-ET.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; Hak Jun Jeong; San Hyun Yoon; Min Whan Koh; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Blastocyst culture selects for euploid embryos: comparison of blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies.

Authors:  Alexis Adler; Hsaio-Ling Lee; David H McCulloh; Esmeralda Ampeloquio; Melicia Clarke-Williams; Brooke Hodes Wertz; James Grifo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: impact of age on the results.

Authors:  S Fernández-Shaw; R Cercas; C Braña; C Villas; I Pons
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Federico Cirillo; Antonella Smeraldi; Emanuela Morenghi; Giulia E G Mulazzani; Elena Albani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The predictive value of using a combined Z-score and day 3 embryo morphology score in the assessment of embryo survival on day 5.

Authors:  Kuo-Chung Lan; Fu-Jen Huang; Yi-Chi Lin; Fu-Tsai Kung; Chin-Hsiung Hsieh; Hsuan-Wei Huang; Ping-Heng Tan; Shiuh Young Chang
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The value of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with ovarian response and gonadotrophin-dose adjustments.

Authors:  Ellen Anckaert; Johan Smitz; Johan Schiettecatte; Bjarke M Klein; Joan-Carles Arce
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Elevated Progesterone Levels on the Day of Oocyte Maturation May Affect Top Quality Embryo IVF Cycles.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Xinling Ren; Li Wu; Lixia Zhu; Bei Xu; Yufeng Li; Jihui Ai; Lei Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of embryo quality and endometrial thickness on implantation in natural cycle IVF.

Authors:  Vlatka Tomic; Miro Kasum; Katarina Vucic
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wenzhi Li; Mingru Yin; Menghui Li; Ling Wu; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Bin Li; Zheng Yan; Qifeng Lyu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.