Literature DB >> 25558824

All in the Family: Barriers and Motivators to the Use of Cancer Family History Questionnaires and the Impact on Attendance Rates.

Susan Randall Armel1,2,3, Jeanna McCuaig4,5,6, Nicole Gojska4, Rochelle Demsky4,5,6, Manjula Maganti7, Joan Murphy4,5,8, Barry Rosen4,5,8.   

Abstract

Data has demonstrated that family history questionnaires (FHQs) are an invaluable tool for assessing familial cancer risk and triaging patients for genetic counseling services. Despite their benefits, return rates of mailed FHQs from newly referred patients remain low, suggesting potential barriers to their use. To investigate this, a total of 461 participants, 239 who completed a FHQ (responders) and 222 who did not (non-responders), were surveyed at a subsequent appointment regarding potential barriers and motivators to using the FHQ. With respective rates of 51 and 56 %, there was no significant difference in the proportion of responders and non-responders who reported difficulty in completing the FHQ; however, for both groups factors related to family dynamics (large family size, lack of contact with relatives, and lack of knowledge of family history) were reported as major variables confounding completion of the FHQ. Responders were also significantly more likely to have a personal diagnosis of cancer (p = 0.02) and to report that their physician had discussed the reason for the appointment with them (p = 0.01). Overall, 19 % of non-responders returned their FHQ after being mailed an appointment letter and 67 % attended their scheduled genetic counseling appointment. These findings demonstrate that difficulty completing the FHQ is not inherent to its design but due to difficulty accessing one's family history, and that mailed appointment letters are a highly successful way to increase attendance rates in the non-responder population. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the important role that referring physicians play in the utilization of genetic counseling services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Family history questionnaire; Genetic counseling; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; Service utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25558824     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9813-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of questionnaire on cancer family history in identifying patients at increased genetic risk in general practice.

Authors:  V Leggatt; J Mackay; J R Yates
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Implications for cancer genetics practice of pro-actively assessing family history in a General Practice cohort in North West London.

Authors:  Kelly Kohut; Lucia D'Mello; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Sarah Thomas; Mary-Anne Young; Kathryn Myhill; Susan Shanley; Brian H J Briggs; Michelle Newman; Ifthikhar M Saraf; Penny Cox; Sarah Scambler; Lyndon Wagman; Michael T Wyndham; Rosalind A Eeles; Michelle Ferris
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  "For all my family's sake, I should go and find out": an Australian report on genetic counseling and testing uptake in individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Claire E Wakefield; Paboda Ratnayake; Bettina Meiser; Graeme Suthers; Melanie A Price; Jessica Duffy; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-01-23

4.  Acceptance, motivators, and barriers in attending breast cancer genetic counseling in Asians.

Authors:  Tan-Min Chin; Sing-Huang Tan; Siew-Eng Lim; Philip Iau; Wei-Peng Yong; Seng-Weng Wong; Soo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2005-09-23

5.  The use of family history questionnaires: an examination of genetic risk estimates and genetic testing eligibility in the non-responder population.

Authors:  Susan Randall Armel; Kara Hitchman; Kathryn Millar; Laura Zahavich; Rochelle Demsky; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA 1/2 testing among United States physicians: a vignette-based study.

Authors:  Katrina F Trivers; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Jacqueline W Miller; Barbara Matthews; C Holly A Andrilla; Denise M Lishner; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Barriers in identification and referral to genetic counseling for familial cancer risk: the perspective of genetic service providers.

Authors:  Sharon J Rolnick; Alanna K Rahm; Jody M Jackson; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Katrina A B Goddard; Terry Field; Catherine McCarty; Cynthia Nakasato; Douglas Roblin; Christopher P Anderson; Rodolfo Valdez
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort.

Authors:  C Foster; D G R Evans; R Eeles; D Eccles; S Ashley; L Brooks; T Cole; J Cook; R Davidson; H Gregory; J Mackay; P J Morrison; M Watson
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

9.  The effectiveness of family history questionnaires in cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Susan Randall Armel; Jeanna McCuaig; Amy Finch; Rochelle Demsky; Tony Panzarella; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Consistency of self-reported first-degree family history of cancer in a population-based study.

Authors:  Fernanda Lenara Roth; Suzi Alves Camey; Maira Caleffi; Lavínia Schuler-Faccini; Edenir Inêz Palmero; Carla Bochi; Susana Mayer Moreira; Luciane Kalakun; Roberto Giugliani; Patrícia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ancestry Testing and the Practice of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Brianne E Kirkpatrick; Misha D Rashkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.