Literature DB >> 21254855

"For all my family's sake, I should go and find out": an Australian report on genetic counseling and testing uptake in individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Claire E Wakefield1, Paboda Ratnayake, Bettina Meiser, Graeme Suthers, Melanie A Price, Jessica Duffy, Kathy Tucker.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite proven benefits, the uptake of genetic counseling and testing by at-risk family members of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers remains low. AIMS: This study aimed to examine at-risk individuals' reported reasons for and against familial cancer clinic (FCC) attendance and genetic testing.
METHODS: Thirty-nine telephone interviews were conducted with relatives of high-risk mutation carriers, 23% (n = 9) of whom had not previously attended an FCC. Interview responses were analyzed using the frameworks of Miles and Huberman.
RESULTS: The reasons most commonly reported for FCC attendance were for clarification of risk status and to gain access to testing. While disinterest in testing was one reason for FCC nonattendance, several individuals were unaware of their risk (n = 3) or their eligibility to attend an FCC (n = 2), despite being notified of their risk status through their participation in a large-scale research project. Individuals' reasons for undergoing testing were in line with that reported elsewhere; however, concerns about discrimination and insurance were not reported in nontestees.
CONCLUSIONS: Current guidelines regarding notifying individuals discovered to be at increased risk in a research, rather than clinical setting, take a largely nondirective approach. However, this study demonstrates that individuals who receive a single letter notifying them of their risk may not understand/value the information they receive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21254855     DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2010.0158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers        ISSN: 1945-0257


  14 in total

1.  A model for patient-direct screening and referral for familial cancer risk.

Authors:  Kristin B Niendorf; Melissa A Geller; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Timothy R Church; Anna Leininger; Angela Bakke; Robert D Madoff
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Timing and context: important considerations in the return of genetic results to research participants.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Nina Hallowell; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-05-26

3.  Why Is Cancer Genetic Counseling Underutilized by Women Identified as at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer? Patient Perceptions of Barriers Following a Referral Letter.

Authors:  Alyssa Kne; Heather Zierhut; Shari Baldinger; Karen K Swenson; Pamela Mink; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Michaela L Tsai
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Overcoming Barriers to Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Swetha Srinivasan; Heather Hampel; Jennifer Leeman; Amit Patel; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Daniel S Reuland; Megan C Roberts
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-07-29

5.  All in the Family: Barriers and Motivators to the Use of Cancer Family History Questionnaires and the Impact on Attendance Rates.

Authors:  Susan Randall Armel; Jeanna McCuaig; Nicole Gojska; Rochelle Demsky; Manjula Maganti; Joan Murphy; Barry Rosen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Amanda M Willis; Sian K Smith; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Martin Tattersall; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  A systematic review of factors that act as barriers to patient referral to genetic services.

Authors:  Türem Delikurt; Graham R Williamson; Violetta Anastasiadou; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS).

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Loren Plunkett; Laura E Forrest; Nina Hallowell; Samantha Wake; Kathryn Alsop; Margaret Gleeson; David Bowtell; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Beth Anderson; Jennifer McLosky; Elizabeth Wasilevich; Sarah Lyon-Callo; Debra Duquette; Glenn Copeland
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-22

10.  Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Jill Bennett Gaieski; Amanda Brandt; Danielle McKenna; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.