Yinin Hu1, Joanna Choi1, Adela Mahmutovic1, Helen Kim1, Ivy A Le1, Sara K Rasmussen2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: skr3f@virginia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A procedural training protocol for medical students must be cognizant of faculty opportunity costs, which may preclude individually supervised practice. Meanwhile, sporadic exposure in large group settings yields suboptimal proficiency. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of undergraduate assistant instructors in providing one-on-one simulation-based instruction for basic invasive techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators designed proficiency-based checklists by faculty consensus for three simulation tasks as follows: orotracheal intubation, central venous catheterization, and suturing. Four undergraduate students were trained as instructors. Interrater agreement between instructors using the task checklists ranged from 0.754-0.866. Instructors conducted up to seven flexibly scheduled, one-on-one practice sessions with clinically inexperienced medical student participants. Sessions comprised repetitive task attempts with an evaluation after every attempt. On completion of the training protocol, participants underwent evaluation by an experienced surgeon blinded to practice session performance. Study participants were surveyed to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants completed the study. Median total practice time was 8.75 h (interquartile range 7.12-8.75). Posttest pass rates were 93% (26/28), 71% (20/28), and 68% (19/28) for suturing, intubation, and central venous catheterization, respectively. Ninety-seven percent (27/28) of participants were satisfied with their experience, and 62% (18/29) advocated for protocol adoption into the standard preclinical curriculum. Estimated cost saved using student instructors, based on departmental collections for surgical faculty, was $43,760. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically inexperienced assistants may be trained as instructors for basic simulation tasks with excellent interrater reliability. Deploying these assistant instructors makes effective, one-on-one technical training for preclinical medical students financially feasible.
BACKGROUND: A procedural training protocol for medical students must be cognizant of faculty opportunity costs, which may preclude individually supervised practice. Meanwhile, sporadic exposure in large group settings yields suboptimal proficiency. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of undergraduate assistant instructors in providing one-on-one simulation-based instruction for basic invasive techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators designed proficiency-based checklists by faculty consensus for three simulation tasks as follows: orotracheal intubation, central venous catheterization, and suturing. Four undergraduate students were trained as instructors. Interrater agreement between instructors using the task checklists ranged from 0.754-0.866. Instructors conducted up to seven flexibly scheduled, one-on-one practice sessions with clinically inexperienced medical student participants. Sessions comprised repetitive task attempts with an evaluation after every attempt. On completion of the training protocol, participants underwent evaluation by an experienced surgeon blinded to practice session performance. Study participants were surveyed to assess satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants completed the study. Median total practice time was 8.75 h (interquartile range 7.12-8.75). Posttest pass rates were 93% (26/28), 71% (20/28), and 68% (19/28) for suturing, intubation, and central venous catheterization, respectively. Ninety-seven percent (27/28) of participants were satisfied with their experience, and 62% (18/29) advocated for protocol adoption into the standard preclinical curriculum. Estimated cost saved using student instructors, based on departmental collections for surgical faculty, was $43,760. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically inexperienced assistants may be trained as instructors for basic simulation tasks with excellent interrater reliability. Deploying these assistant instructors makes effective, one-on-one technical training for preclinical medical students financially feasible.
Authors: Orhan Cinar; Erdem Cevik; Ali Osman Yildirim; Mehmet Yasar; Erden Kilic; Bilgin Comert Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: David A Berg; Richard E Milner; Carol A Fisher; Amy J Goldberg; Daniel T Dempsey; Harsh Grewal Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Michael J Kim; Margaret L Boehler; Janet K Ketchum; Reuben Bueno; Reed G Williams; Gary L Dunnington Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Irene W Y Ma; Nadia Zalunardo; George Pachev; Tanya Beran; Melanie Brown; Rose Hatala; Kevin McLaughlin Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 3.853
Authors: Yasuharu Okuda; Ethan O Bryson; Samuel DeMaria; Lisa Jacobson; Joshua Quinones; Bing Shen; Adam I Levine Journal: Mt Sinai J Med Date: 2009-08
Authors: Madeline Lemke; Hillary Lia; Alexander Gabinet-Equihua; Guy Sheahan; Andrea Winthrop; Stephen Mann; Gabor Fichtinger; Boris Zevin Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 4.584