Madeline Lemke1, Hillary Lia2, Alexander Gabinet-Equihua1, Guy Sheahan3, Andrea Winthrop3, Stephen Mann3, Gabor Fichtinger2, Boris Zevin4,5. 1. School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 2. School of Computing, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 3. Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 4. Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. Boris.Zevin@Kingstonhsc.ca. 5. Division of General Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, 76 Stuart Street, Burr 2, Kingston, ON, K7L 2V7, Canada. Boris.Zevin@Kingstonhsc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suturing is a fundamental skill in undergraduate medical education. It can be taught by faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and holography-augmented methods; however, the most educationally effective and cost-efficient method for proficiency-based teaching of suturing is yet to be determined. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and holography-augmented proficiency-based suturing training in pre-clerkship medical students. Holography-augmented training provided holographic, voice-controlled instructional material. Technical skill was assessed using hand motion analysis every ten sutures and used to construct learning curves. Proficiency was defined by one standard deviation within average faculty surgeon performance. Intervention arms were compared using one-way ANOVA of the number of sutures placed, full-length sutures used, time to proficiency, and incremental costs incurred. Surveys were used to evaluate participant preferences. RESULTS:Forty-four students were randomized to the faculty-led (n = 16), peer tutor-led (n = 14), and holography-augmented (n = 14) intervention arms. At proficiency, there were no differences between groups in the number of sutures placed, full-length sutures used, and time to achieve proficiency. The incremental costs of the holography-augmented method were greater than faculty-led and peer tutor-led instruction ($247.00 ± $12.05, p < 0.001) due to the high cost of the equipment. Faculty-led teaching was the most preferred method (78.0%), while holography-augmented was the least preferred (0%). 90.6% of students reported high confidence in performing simple interrupted sutures, which did not differ between intervention arms (faculty-led 100.0%, peer tutor-led 90.0%, holography-augmented 83.3%, p = 0.409). 93.8% of students felt the program should be offered in the future. CONCLUSION:Faculty-led and peer tutor-led instructional methods of proficiency-based suturing teaching were superior to holography-augmented method with respect to costs and participants' preferences despite being educationally equivalent.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Suturing is a fundamental skill in undergraduate medical education. It can be taught by faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and holography-augmented methods; however, the most educationally effective and cost-efficient method for proficiency-based teaching of suturing is yet to be determined. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing faculty-led, peer tutor-led, and holography-augmented proficiency-based suturing training in pre-clerkship medical students. Holography-augmented training provided holographic, voice-controlled instructional material. Technical skill was assessed using hand motion analysis every ten sutures and used to construct learning curves. Proficiency was defined by one standard deviation within average faculty surgeon performance. Intervention arms were compared using one-way ANOVA of the number of sutures placed, full-length sutures used, time to proficiency, and incremental costs incurred. Surveys were used to evaluate participant preferences. RESULTS: Forty-four students were randomized to the faculty-led (n = 16), peer tutor-led (n = 14), and holography-augmented (n = 14) intervention arms. At proficiency, there were no differences between groups in the number of sutures placed, full-length sutures used, and time to achieve proficiency. The incremental costs of the holography-augmented method were greater than faculty-led and peer tutor-led instruction ($247.00 ± $12.05, p < 0.001) due to the high cost of the equipment. Faculty-led teaching was the most preferred method (78.0%), while holography-augmented was the least preferred (0%). 90.6% of students reported high confidence in performing simple interrupted sutures, which did not differ between intervention arms (faculty-led 100.0%, peer tutor-led 90.0%, holography-augmented 83.3%, p = 0.409). 93.8% of students felt the program should be offered in the future. CONCLUSION: Faculty-led and peer tutor-led instructional methods of proficiency-based suturing teaching were superior to holography-augmented method with respect to costs and participants' preferences despite being educationally equivalent.
Entities:
Keywords:
Competency-based medical education; Hand motion analysis; Resource utilization; Surgical skills; Undergraduate medical education
Authors: George J Xeroulis; Jason Park; Carol-Anne Moulton; Richard K Reznick; Vicki Leblanc; Adam Dubrowski Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Pedro Pablo Gomez; Ross E Willis; Breanne L Schiffer; Aimee K Gardner; Daniel J Scott Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Martin G Tolsgaard; Ann Tabor; Mette E Madsen; Camilla B Wulff; Liv Dyre; Charlotte Ringsted; Lone N Nørgaard Journal: Med Educ Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 6.251