Literature DB >> 25552955

Does the number of irradiated cells influence the spatial distribution of bystander effects?

A Belchior1, I Balásházy2, O Monteiro Gil3, P Vaz3, P Almeida4.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that the radiation effects at low doses are not adequately described by a simple linear extrapolation from high doses, due, among others, to bystander effects. Though several studies have been published on this topic, the explanation of the mechanisms describing the bystander effects remains unclear. This study aims at understanding how the bystander signals are or can be propagated in the cell culture, namely if the number of irradiated cells influences the bystander response. An A549 cell line was exposed to several doses of α-particles, being the bystander response quantified in two non-irradiated areas. The radius of irradiated areas differs by a factor of 2, and the non-irradiated areas were optimally designed to have the same number of cells. Our results show evidence for bystander effects occurring in cells far away from the irradiated ones, meaning that bystander signals can easily spread throughout the cell culture. Additionally, our study highlights that the damage caused by radiation on the surrounding of irradiated areas could be different according to the number of irradiated cells, i.e., for the same dose value; the overall cellular damage could be different.

Keywords:  A549 cells; Low dose; alpha-radiation; bystander effects; spatial distribution

Year:  2014        PMID: 25552955      PMCID: PMC4267447          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.14-001.Belchior

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  35 in total

1.  Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays.

Authors:  G Schettino; M Folkard; K M Prise; B Vojnovic; K D Held; B D Michael
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Heavy-ion-induced bystander killing of human lung cancer cells: role of gap junctional intercellular communication.

Authors:  Kosaku Harada; Tetsuo Nonaka; Nobuyuki Hamada; Hideyuki Sakurai; Masatoshi Hasegawa; Tomoo Funayama; Takehiko Kakizaki; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.716

3.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The effect of diesel exhaust particles on cell function and release of inflammatory mediators from human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  H Bayram; J L Devalia; R J Sapsford; T Ohtoshi; Y Miyabara; M Sagai; R J Davies
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.914

5.  Inducible response required for repair of low-dose radiation damage in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Saskia Grudzenski; Antonia Raths; Sandro Conrad; Claudia E Rübe; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  LDR brachytherapy: can low dose rate hypersensitivity from the "inverse" dose rate effect cause excessive cell killing to peripherial connective tissues and organs?

Authors:  B E Leonard; A C Lucas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  GammaH2AX and cancer.

Authors:  William M Bonner; Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Olga A Sedelnikova; Stéphanie Solier; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; C Boon; C Redon; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation.

Authors:  W Rühm; E Fantuzzi; R Harrison; H Schuhmacher; F Vanhavere; J Alves; J F Bottollier Depois; P Fattibene; Ž Knežević; M A Lopez; S Mayer; S Miljanić; S Neumaier; P Olko; H Stadtmann; R Tanner; C Woda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Dose Rate Effects on the Selective Radiosensitization of Prostate Cells by GRPR-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ana Marques; Ana Belchior; Francisco Silva; Fernanda Marques; Maria Paula Cabral Campello; Teresa Pinheiro; Pedro Santos; Luis Santos; António P A Matos; António Paulo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Internal microdosimetry of alpha-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Werner Hofmann; Wei Bo Li; Werner Friedland; Brian W Miller; Balázs Madas; Manuel Bardiès; Imre Balásházy
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 1.925

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.