Literature DB >> 27355245

Mortality among military participants at the 1957 PLUMBBOB nuclear weapons test series and from leukemia among participants at the SMOKY test.

Glyn G Caldwell1, Matthew M Zack, Michael T Mumma, Henry Falk, Clark W Heath, John E Till, Heidi Chen, John D Boice.   

Abstract

Health effects following low doses of ionizing radiation are uncertain. Military veterans at the Nevada test site (NTS) during the SMOKY atmospheric nuclear weapons test in 1957 were reported to be at increased risk for leukemia in 1979, but this increase was not evaluated with respect to radiation dose. The SMOKY test was one of 30 tests in 1957 within the PLUMBBOB test series. These early studies led to public laws where atomic veterans could qualify for compensation for presumptive radiogenic diseases. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 12219 veterans at the PLUMBBOB test series, including 3020 at the SMOKY nuclear test. Mortality follow-up was through 2010 and observed causes of death were compared with expected causes based on general population rates. Radiation dose to red bone marrow was based on individual dose reconstructions, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate dose response for all leukemias other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia (non-CLL leukemia). Vital status was determined for 95.3% of the 12 219 veterans. The dose to red bone marrow was low (mean 3.2 mGy, maximum 500 mGy). Military participants at the PLUMBBOB nuclear test series remained relatively healthy after 53 years and died at a lower rate than the general population. In contrast, and in comparison with national rates, the SMOKY participants showed significant increases in all causes of death, respiratory cancer, leukemia, nephritis and nephrosis, and accidents, possibly related in part to lifestyle factors common to enlisted men who made up 81% of the SMOKY cohort. Compared with national rates, a statistically significant excess of non-CLL leukemia was observed among SMOKY participants (Standardized Mortality Ratio  =  1.89, 95% 1.24-2.75, n  =  27) but not among PLUMBBOB participants after excluding SMOKY (SMR  =  0.87, 95% 0.64-1.51, n  =  47). Leukemia risk, initially reported to be significantly increased among SMOKY participants, remained elevated, but this risk diminished over time. Despite an intense dose reconstruction, the risk for leukemia was not found to increase with increasing levels of radiation dose to the red bone marrow. Based on a linear model, the estimated excess relative risk per mGy is  -0.05 (95% CI -0.14, 0.04). An explanation for the observed excess of leukemia remains unresolved but conceivably could be related to chance due to small numbers, subtle biases in the study design and/or high tobacco use among enlisted men. Larger studies should elucidate further the possible relationship between fallout radiation, leukemia and cancer among atomic veterans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27355245      PMCID: PMC5115961          DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/36/3/474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  27 in total

1.  Drinking and other risk taking behaviors of enlisted male soldiers in the US Army.

Authors:  Jeffrey O Williams; Nicole S Bell; Paul J Amoroso
Journal:  Work       Date:  2002

2.  Trends in US smoking rates in occupational groups: the National Health Interview Survey 1987-1994.

Authors:  David J Lee; William LeBlanc; Lora E Fleming; Orlando Gómez-Marín; Terry Pitman
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  ICRP Publication 116. Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures.

Authors:  N Petoussi-Henss; W E Bolch; K F Eckerman; A Endo; N Hertel; J Hunt; M Pelliccioni; H Schlattl; M Zankl
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2010 Apr-Oct

4.  Implications of radiation dose and exposed populations on radiation protection in the 21st century.

Authors:  John D Boice
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  OCMAP-PLUS: a program for the comprehensive analysis of occupational cohort data.

Authors:  G M Marsh; A O Youk; R A Stone; S Sefcik; C Alcorn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  Cigarette smoking and leukemia.

Authors:  J K McLaughlin; Z Hrubec; M S Linet; E F Heineman; W J Blot; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-08-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines.

Authors:  André Bouville; Richard E Toohey; John D Boice; Harold L Beck; Larry T Dauer; Keith F Eckerman; Derek Hagemeyer; Richard W Leggett; Michael T Mumma; Bruce Napier; Kathy H Pryor; Marvin Rosenstein; David A Schauer; Sami Sherbini; Daniel O Stram; James L Thompson; John E Till; Craig Yoder; Cary Zeitlin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 8.  Epidemiological studies of UK test veterans: II. Mortality and cancer incidence.

Authors:  C R Muirhead; G M Kendall; S C Darby; R Doll; R G E Haylock; J A O'Hagan; G L C Berridge; M A Phillipson; N Hunter
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.394

9.  The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950-2001.

Authors:  Wan-Ling Hsu; Dale L Preston; Midori Soda; Hiromi Sugiyama; Sachiyo Funamoto; Kazunori Kodama; Akiro Kimura; Nanao Kamada; Hiroo Dohy; Masao Tomonaga; Masako Iwanaga; Yasushi Miyazaki; Harry M Cullings; Akihiko Suyama; Kotaro Ozasa; Roy E Shore; Kiyohiko Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Mortality and cancer frequency among military nuclear test (Smoky) participants, 1957 through 1979.

Authors:  G G Caldwell; D Kelley; M Zack; H Falk; C W Heath
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-05       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Issues in Interpreting Epidemiologic Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Ethel S Gilbert; Mark P Little; Dale L Preston; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 2.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

3.  Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Robert D Daniels; Elisabeth Cardis; Harry M Cullings; Ethel Gilbert; Michael Hauptmann; Gerald Kendall; Dominique Laurier; Martha S Linet; Mark P Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; David B Richardson; Daniel Stram; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.

Authors:  Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Elisabeth Cardis; Dominique Laurier; Jay H Lubin; Michael Hauptmann; David B Richardson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

Review 5.  Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Alexander Vaiserman; Alexander Koliada; Oksana Zabuga; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.658

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.