OBJECTIVE: Studies of major depression in twins and families have shown moderate to high heritability, but extensive molecular studies have failed to identify susceptibility genes convincingly. To detect genetic variants contributing to major depression, the authors performed a genome-wide association study using 1,636 cases of depression ascertained in the U.K. and 1,594 comparison subjects screened negative for psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Cases were collected from 1) a case-control study of recurrent depression (the Depression Case Control [DeCC] study; N=1346), 2) an affected sibling pair linkage study of recurrent depression (probands from the Depression Network [DeNT] study; N=332), and 3) a pharmacogenetic study (the Genome-Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression [GENDEP] study; N=88). Depression cases and comparison subjects were genotyped at Centre National de Génotypage on the Illumina Human610-Quad BeadChip. After applying stringent quality control criteria for missing genotypes, departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and low minor allele frequency, the authors tested for association to depression using logistic regression, correcting for population ancestry. RESULTS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in BICC1 achieved suggestive evidence for association, which strengthened after imputation of ungenotyped markers, and in analysis of female depression cases. A meta-analysis of U.K. data with previously published results from studies in Munich and Lausanne showed some evidence for association near neuroligin 1 (NLGN1) on chromosome 3, but did not support findings at BICC1. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies several signals for association worthy of further investigation but, as in previous genome-wide studies, suggests that individual gene contributions to depression are likely to have only minor effects, and very large pooled analyses will be required to identify them.
OBJECTIVE: Studies of major depression in twins and families have shown moderate to high heritability, but extensive molecular studies have failed to identify susceptibility genes convincingly. To detect genetic variants contributing to major depression, the authors performed a genome-wide association study using 1,636 cases of depression ascertained in the U.K. and 1,594 comparison subjects screened negative for psychiatric disorders. METHOD: Cases were collected from 1) a case-control study of recurrent depression (the Depression Case Control [DeCC] study; N=1346), 2) an affected sibling pair linkage study of recurrent depression (probands from the Depression Network [DeNT] study; N=332), and 3) a pharmacogenetic study (the Genome-Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression [GENDEP] study; N=88). Depression cases and comparison subjects were genotyped at Centre National de Génotypage on the Illumina Human610-Quad BeadChip. After applying stringent quality control criteria for missing genotypes, departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and low minor allele frequency, the authors tested for association to depression using logistic regression, correcting for population ancestry. RESULTS: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in BICC1 achieved suggestive evidence for association, which strengthened after imputation of ungenotyped markers, and in analysis of female depression cases. A meta-analysis of U.K. data with previously published results from studies in Munich and Lausanne showed some evidence for association near neuroligin 1 (NLGN1) on chromosome 3, but did not support findings at BICC1. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies several signals for association worthy of further investigation but, as in previous genome-wide studies, suggests that individual gene contributions to depression are likely to have only minor effects, and very large pooled analyses will be required to identify them.
Authors: Gerome Breen; Cathryn M Lewis; Evangelos Vassos; Michele L Pergadia; Douglas H R Blackwood; Dorret I Boomsma; Brenda Penninx; Patrick F Sullivan; Inti Pedroso; David Collier; Peter McGuffin Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Samuel R Mathias; Emma E M Knowles; Jack W Kent; D Reese McKay; Joanne E Curran; Marcio A A de Almeida; Thomas D Dyer; Harald H H Göring; Rene L Olvera; Ravi Duggirala; Peter T Fox; Laura Almasy; John Blangero; David C Glahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Erin C Dunn; Ruth C Brown; Yael Dai; Jonathan Rosand; Nicole R Nugent; Ananda B Amstadter; Jordan W Smoller Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2015 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Sonja Sulkava; Hanna M Ollila; Kirsi Ahola; Timo Partonen; Katriina Viitasalo; Johannes Kettunen; Maarit Lappalainen; Mika Kivimäki; Jussi Vahtera; Jaana Lindström; Mikko Härmä; Sampsa Puttonen; Veikko Salomaa; Tiina Paunio Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Robert A Philibert; Steven R H Beach; Tracy D Gunter; Alexandre A Todorov; Gene H Brody; Meeshanthini Vijayendran; Lilly Elliott; Nancy Hollenbeck; Daniel Russell; Carolyn Cutrona Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Maciej Trzaskowski; Divya Mehta; Wouter J Peyrot; David Hawkes; Daniel Davies; David M Howard; Kathryn E Kemper; Julia Sidorenko; Robert Maier; Stephan Ripke; Manuel Mattheisen; Bernhard T Baune; Hans J Grabe; Andrew C Heath; Lisa Jones; Ian Jones; Pamela A F Madden; Andrew M McIntosh; Gerome Breen; Cathryn M Lewis; Anders D Børglum; Patrick F Sullivan; Nicholas G Martin; Kenneth S Kendler; Douglas F Levinson; Naomi R Wray Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Emma E M Knowles; Jack W Kent; D Reese McKay; Emma Sprooten; Samuel R Mathias; Joanne E Curran; Melanie A Carless; Marcio A A de Almeida; H H Goring Harald; Tom D Dyer; Rene L Olvera; Peter T Fox; Ravi Duggirala; Laura Almasy; John Blangero; David C Glahn Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 4.839