Literature DB >> 8327668

Imaging of the radiographically dense breast.

V P Jackson1, R E Hendrick, S A Feig, D B Kopans.   

Abstract

Despite recent improvements in mammography equipment and technique, the radiographically dense breast remains difficult to image. The problems in imaging the dense breast account for a large percentage of the cases of mammographically "missed" carcinomas. Other imaging modalities--such as ultrasonography, transillumination, thermography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radionuclide imaging--have been investigated for use in breast cancer detection. This overview discusses the current problems associated with imaging of the radiographically dense breast and suggests some avenues for investigation to develop solutions to these problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8327668     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.188.2.8327668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  39 in total

1.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

2.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Evaluating the effect of a wavelet enhancement method in characterization of simulated lesions embedded in dense breast parenchyma.

Authors:  L Costaridou; S Skiadopoulos; P Sakellaropoulos; E Likaki; C P Kalogeropoulou; G Panayiotakis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluating thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound.

Authors:  Rebecca C Booi; Jochen F Krücker; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Matthew O'Donnell; Ajay Kapur; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Marilyn A Roubidoux; J Brian Fowlkes; Paul L Carson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Huanjun Ding; Stephen Feig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  [Sonographically guided, minimally invasive biopsy of uncertain mammary lesions. Clinical experience with a new biopsy system].

Authors:  H Sittek; A Wieser; M Kessler; S Britsch; C Vick; M Untch; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Correlation of PUV and SUV in the extremities while using PEM as a high-resolution positron emission scanner.

Authors:  Sania Rahim; Osama Mawlawi; Patricia Fox; Shree Taylor; Richelle Millican; Nancy M Swanston; J Elliott Brown; Eric M Rohren
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Dedicated breast computed tomography: volume image denoising via a partial-diffusion equation based technique.

Authors:  Jessie Q Xia; Joseph Y Lo; Kai Yang; Carey E Floyd; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Scintimammography as an adjunctive breast imaging technology: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2007-04-01

Review 10.  Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography (MSOT) in Oncology.

Authors:  Lacey R McNally; Megan Mezera; Desiree E Morgan; Peter J Frederick; Eddy S Yang; Isam-Eldin Eltoum; William E Grizzle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.