| Literature DB >> 25547027 |
Baharul I Choudhury1, Mohammed L Khan, Selvadurai Dayanandan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indigenous rice varieties in the Eastern Himalayan region of Northeast India are traditionally classified into sali, boro and jum ecotypes based on geographical locality and the season of cultivation. In this study, we used DNA sequence data from the Waxy (Wx) gene to infer the genetic relatedness among indigenous rice varieties in Northeast India and to assess the genetic distinctiveness of ecotypes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25547027 PMCID: PMC4320456 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Figure 1Map of NE India showing sampling sites of indigenous rice varieties.
The variety name, cultivation type and collection sites of traditionally cultivated indigenous and agronomically improved rice varieties in Northeast India (AP, Arunachal Pradesh; AS, Assam; ML, Meghalaya; MZ, Mizoram)
| Variety Name | Type | Location |
|---|---|---|
| Bas Beroin | Sali | Cachar (AS) |
| Balam | Sali | Cachar (AS) |
| Lahi | Sali | Doimukh (AP) |
| Local Basmati | Sali | Doimukh (AP) |
| Joha | Sali | Doimukh (AP) |
| Lallatoi | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Arfa | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Mulahail | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Guaroi | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Harinarayan | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Bherapawa | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Kakiberoin | Sali | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Borjahinga | Sali | N. Lakhimpur, (AS) |
| Til Bora | Sali | N. Lakhimpur, (AS) |
| Hati Hali | Sali | N. Lakhimpur, (AS) |
| Ranga Borah | Sali | N. Lakhimpur, (AS) |
| Ranjit | Sali (Improved) | Hailakandi (AS) |
| IR8 | Sali (Improved) | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Bahadur | Sali (Improved) | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Pankaj | Sali (Improved) | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Joya | Sali (Improved) | Hailakandi (AS) |
| Kawanglawang | Jum | Aizwal, (MZ) |
| Sorpuma | Jum | Doimukh (AP) |
| Mimutim | Jum | Garo Hills (ML) |
| Papue | Jum | West Siang (AP) |
| Borua Beroin | Boro | Cachar (AS) |
| Aubalam | Boro | Cachar (AS) |
| Bashful | Boro | Cachar (AS) |
| Moircha | Boro | Cachar (AS) |
|
| Wild | Eastern India |
Oligonucleotide primer sequences used for amplification of the gene
| Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|
| WxU1F5′-GCCGAGGGACCTAATCTGC-3′ | Wx1R5′-TGGTGTGGGTGGCTATTTGTAG-3′ |
| Wx2Fa5′-GCCCCGCATGTCATCGTC-3′ | Wx2R5′-GTTGTCTAGCTGTTGCTGTGGA-3′ |
| WxU1Fint5′-TTGTCAGCACGTACAAGCA-3′ | Wx2Rint5′-GCTATATACATTTTCCTTTGACCAA-3′ |
The best model of nucleotide substitution obtained through Modeltest analy ses based on Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)
| Model selected | HKY + I + G |
|---|---|
| -lnL | 4690.042 |
| AIC | 9392.084 |
| Base frequencies | A = 0.275 |
| C = 0.239 | |
| G = 0.213 | |
| T = 0.273 | |
| Substitution model | Ti/Tv ratio = 3.489 |
| Among-site rate variation | Proportion of invariable sites (I) = 0.937 |
| Variable sites (G) | Gamma distribution shape parameter = 0.148 |
| Using mixed χ2 distribution | P-value = < 0.00001 |
Figure 2Bayesian phylogram of rice ecotypes based on the nucleotide sequences of the gene. Abbreviations in brackets represent ecotype and numbers over the nodes represent posterior probability values. Group-III is the subgroup within Group-I.
Figure 3Haplotype networks for the gene. Each node represents a haplotype and size of the circle is proportional to its frequency.
The pairwise differentiation ( ) of ecotypes
| Ecotypes |
|
|---|---|
|
| 0.005 |
|
| 0.108 |
|
| 0.230 |