Literature DB >> 25546290

Estimation of ROC curve with complex survey data.

Wenliang Yao1, Zhaohai Li, Barry I Graubard.   

Abstract

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve can be utilized to evaluate the performance of diagnostic tests. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is a widely used summary index for comparing multiple ROC curves. Both parametric and nonparametric methods have been developed to estimate and compare the AUCs. However, these methods are usually only applicable to data collected from simple random samples and not surveys and epidemiologic studies that use complex sample designs such as stratified and/or multistage cluster sampling with sample weighting. Such complex samples can inflate variances from intra-cluster correlation and alter the expectations of test statistics because of the use of sample weights that account for differential sampling rates. In this paper, we modify the nonparametric method to incorporate sampling weights to estimate the AUC and employ leaving-one-out jackknife methods along with the balanced repeated replication method to account for the effects of the complex sampling in the variance estimation of our proposed estimators of the AUC. The finite sample properties of our methods are evaluated using simulations, and our methods are illustrated by comparing the estimated AUC for predicting overweight/obesity using different measures of body weight and adiposity among sampled children and adults in the US Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area under the ROC curve (AUC); balanced repeated replication; jackknife variance; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; survey sampling

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25546290      PMCID: PMC4355032          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Comparison of adjustment methods for stratified two-sample tests in the context of ROC analysis.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Martin O Carlsson; Ching-Ray Yu
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias.

Authors:  X H Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Nonparametric analysis of clustered ROC curve data.

Authors:  N A Obuchowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

7.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Estimates of excess deaths associated with body mass index and other anthropometric variables.

Authors:  Katherine M Flegal; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey.

Authors:  T J Cole; M C Bellizzi; K M Flegal; W H Dietz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06
View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing Survey-Based Frailty Assessment to Medicare Claims in Predicting Health Outcomes and Utilization in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Shannon Wu; John Mulcahy; Judith D Kasper; Hong J Kan; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2019-05-31

2.  iCARE: An R package to build, validate and apply absolute risk models.

Authors:  Parichoy Pal Choudhury; Paige Maas; Amber Wilcox; William Wheeler; Mark Brook; David Check; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Are perceived barriers to accessing health care associated with inadequate antenatal care visits among women of reproductive age in Rwanda?

Authors:  Marie Paul Nisingizwe; Germaine Tuyisenge; Celestin Hategeka; Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Identification of plasma lipid species as promising diagnostic markers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoli Chen; Yong Zhu; Mayumi Jijiwa; Masaki Nasu; Junmei Ai; Shengming Dai; Bin Jiang; Jicai Zhang; Gang Huang; Youping Deng
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.