Jacob J van den Berg1, Marjan Javanbakht2,3, Pamina M Gorbach2,3, Bret J Rudy4, Andrew O Westfall, Craig M Wilson5, Michelle A Lally6. 1. Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY. 5. Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL. 6. Department of Medicine, Lifespan Hospital Systems, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and the VA Medical Center, Providence, RI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying factors associated with partner notification among youth living with HIV is critical for effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies. METHODS: A total of 924 male and female behaviorally infected youth aged 13-24 across 14 U.S. cities completed an audio computer-assisted self-interview including questions about demographics and experiences with patient- and provider-referral partner notification. RESULTS: The majority of participants self-identified as male (82.5%), Black/non-Hispanic (70.1%), and Hispanic/Latino (18.2%). Most males (93.4%) reported engaging in male-to-male sexual contact. Over three-quarters (77.6%) reported that all or some of their partners were contacted, while 22.4% indicated that none were contacted regarding potential HIV exposure. Most (52.4%) reported that only one person talked to them about notifying partners including the HIV tester (36.5%) followed by their health care provider/doctor (27.6%). Less than a fifth (18.3%) were themselves notified of their own exposure to HIV. Using multivariable logistic regression, 3 factors were associated with successful partner notification: (1) when more than one person talked to participants about partner notification (AOR = 1.87, 1.33-2.62); (2) if they themselves had been notified of their own HIV exposure (AOR = 1.83, 1.13-2.95); and (3) if their education included some college or technical school versus less than high school (AOR = 1.72, 1.04-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Partner notification among youth living with HIV is unsuccessful at least 22.4% of the time, although minimal criteria for partner services are being met almost universally. Partner notification might benefit from enhanced guidelines that call for both HIV testers and HIV care providers to discuss this important strategy with HIV-positive youth.
BACKGROUND: Identifying factors associated with partner notification among youth living with HIV is critical for effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies. METHODS: A total of 924 male and female behaviorally infected youth aged 13-24 across 14 U.S. cities completed an audio computer-assisted self-interview including questions about demographics and experiences with patient- and provider-referral partner notification. RESULTS: The majority of participants self-identified as male (82.5%), Black/non-Hispanic (70.1%), and Hispanic/Latino (18.2%). Most males (93.4%) reported engaging in male-to-male sexual contact. Over three-quarters (77.6%) reported that all or some of their partners were contacted, while 22.4% indicated that none were contacted regarding potential HIV exposure. Most (52.4%) reported that only one person talked to them about notifying partners including the HIV tester (36.5%) followed by their health care provider/doctor (27.6%). Less than a fifth (18.3%) were themselves notified of their own exposure to HIV. Using multivariable logistic regression, 3 factors were associated with successful partner notification: (1) when more than one person talked to participants about partner notification (AOR = 1.87, 1.33-2.62); (2) if they themselves had been notified of their own HIV exposure (AOR = 1.83, 1.13-2.95); and (3) if their education included some college or technical school versus less than high school (AOR = 1.72, 1.04-2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Partner notification among youth living with HIV is unsuccessful at least 22.4% of the time, although minimal criteria for partner services are being met almost universally. Partner notification might benefit from enhanced guidelines that call for both HIV testers and HIV care providers to discuss this important strategy with HIV-positive youth.
Authors: Kyle T Bernstein; Sally C Stephens; Nicholas Moss; Susan Scheer; Maree Kay Parisi; Susan S Philip Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Lillian B Brown; William C Miller; Gift Kamanga; Naomi Nyirenda; Pearson Mmodzi; Audrey Pettifor; Rosalie C Dominik; Jay S Kaufman; Clement Mapanje; Francis Martinson; Myron S Cohen; Irving F Hoffman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jennifer L Reed; Jill S Huppert; Gordon L Gillespie; Regina G Taylor; Carolyn K Holland; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jacob J van den Berg; Kristi E Gamarel; Andrew O Westfall; J Dennis Fortenberry; Sybil G Hosek; Craig M Wilson; Michelle A Lally Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Ellsworth M Campbell; Anne Patala; Anupama Shankar; Jin-Fen Li; Jeffrey A Johnson; Emily Westheimer; Cynthia L Gay; Stephanie E Cohen; William M Switzer; Philip J Peters Journal: Viruses Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Anne L Stangl; Meroji Sebany; Chisina Kapungu; Cassandra Jessee; Chelsea L Ricker; Eliza Chard Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 5.396