Literature DB >> 23001263

Predictors of male partner treatment for sexually transmitted infection.

Gina M Secura1, Fidel A Desir, Jennifer L Mullersman, Tessa Madden, Jenifer E Allsworth, Jeffrey F Peipert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-initiated notification is a commonly used practice for notifying sex partners of possible exposure to a sexually transmitted infection (STI); however, 46% to 75% of partners are never treated. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project (CHOICE) is a longitudinal cohort study of women that provides no-cost contraception, STI testing, treatment to participants, and free partner treatment. Our objective was to evaluate characteristics of women who tested positive for chlamydia, gonorrhea, or trichomoniasis, and their association with successful partner treatment.
METHODS: We analyzed baseline survey and STI testing, notification, and treatment data from the first 5087 participants enrolled in CHOICE. We considered "treated partners" to be men who received antibiotic treatment at the study clinic or by a prescription through the study. Independent predictors of successful partner treatment were identified using univariate analysis and multivariable analysis using Poisson regression with robust error variance.
RESULTS: Forty-four percent of male partners were successfully treated. Women whose partners were less likely to obtain treatment were black (adjusted Relative Risk (RR adj) RR adj = 0.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-0.8) or reported some concern about future STI with the partner (RR adj = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.8). Women whose partners were more likely to receive treatment were living with their partner (RR adj = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.8) or reported recent inconsistent condom use (RR adj = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: The male partner treatment rate resulting from female patient-initiated partner notification in our study was low. Our findings highlight the need to develop novel notification interventions that yield higher partner treatment rates and consider patient-specific factors, such as race and relationship status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001263      PMCID: PMC3457019          DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31825ec611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  22 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of partner notification methods for prevention of trichomoniasis in women.

Authors:  Jane R Schwebke; Renee A Desmond
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Partner notification for the control of sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Catherine Mathews; David Coetzee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-17

3.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Sexually transmitted diseases: magnitude, determinants and consequences.

Authors:  S O Aral
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.359

5.  Patient preference for patient-delivered partner therapy: exploratory findings from three sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Howard; Fujie Xu; Stephanie N Taylor; Bradley P Stoner; Leandro Mena; M Jacques Nsuami; Suzanne Powell; Rebecca Lillis; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Patient-delivered partner therapy for sexually transmitted diseases as practiced by U.S. physicians.

Authors:  Matthew Hogben; Donna H McCree; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Partner notification of sexually transmitted diseases: practices and preferences.

Authors:  Priya R Gursahaney; Kwonho Jeong; Bruce W Dixon; Harold C Wiesenfeld
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Expedited partner therapy: a robust intervention.

Authors:  Frances Shiely; Kevin Hayes; Katherine K Thomas; Roxanne P Kerani; James P Hughes; William L H Whittington; King K Holmes; H Hunter Handsfield; Matthew Hogben; Matthew R Golden
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 10.  Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review.

Authors:  Sven Trelle; Aijing Shang; Linda Nartey; Jackie A Cassell; Nicola Low
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-17
View more
  3 in total

1.  Patient-Delivered Partner Treatment for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas Infection Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in Kenya.

Authors:  Jennifer A Unger; Daniel Matemo; Jillian Pintye; Alison Drake; John Kinuthia; R Scott McClelland; Grace John-Stewart
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reed; Jill S Huppert; Gordon L Gillespie; Regina G Taylor; Carolyn K Holland; Evaline A Alessandrini; Jessica A Kahn
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Dyadic Intervention for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention in Urban Adolescents and Young Adults (The SEXPERIENCE Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Maria Trent; Hasiya Eihuri Yusuf; Julia Rowell; Jacquelin Toppins; Colin Woods; Steven Huettner; Camille Robinson; Errol L Fields; Arik V Marcell; Ralph DiClemente; Pamela Matson
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.