Virus-based nanoparticles (VNPs) have been used for a wide range of applications, spanning basic materials science and translational medicine. Their propensity to self-assemble into precise structures that offer a three-dimensional scaffold for functionalization has led to their use as optical contrast agents and related biophotonics applications. A number of fluorescently labeled platforms have been developed and their utility in optical imaging demonstrated, yet their optical properties have not been investigated in detail. In this study, two VNPs of varying architectures were compared side-by-side to determine the impact of dye density, dye localization, conjugation chemistry, and microenvironment on the optical properties of the probes. Dyes were attached to icosahedral cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) and rod-shaped tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) through a range of chemistries to target particular side chains displayed at specific locations around the virus. The fluorescence intensity and lifetime of the particles were determined, first using photochemical experiments on the benchtop, and second in imaging experiments using tissue culture experiments. The virus-based optical probes were found to be extraordinarily robust under ultrashort, pulsed laser light conditions with a significant amount of excitation energy, maintaining structural and chemical stability. The most effective fluorescence output was achieved through dye placement at optimized densities coupled to the exterior surface avoiding conjugated ring systems. Lifetime measurements indicate that fluorescence output depends not only on spacing the fluorophores, but also on dimer stacking and configurational changes leading to radiationless relaxation-and these processes are related to the conjugation chemistry and nanoparticle shape. For biological applications, the particles were also examined in tissue culture, from which it was found that the optical properties differed from those found on the benchtop due to effects from cellular processes and uptake kinetics. Data indicate that fluorescent cargos are released in the endolysosomal compartment of the cell targeted by the virus-based optical probes. These studies provide insight into the optical properties and fates of fluorescent proteinaceous imaging probes. The cellular release of cargo has implications not only for virus-based optical probes, but also for drug delivery and release systems.
Virus-based nanoparticles (VNPs) have been used for a wide range of applications, spanning basic materials science and translational medicine. Their propensity to self-assemble into precise structures that offer a three-dimensional scaffold for functionalization has led to their use as optical contrast agents and related biophotonics applications. A number of fluorescently labeled platforms have been developed and their utility in optical imaging demonstrated, yet their optical properties have not been investigated in detail. In this study, two VNPs of varying architectures were compared side-by-side to determine the impact of dye density, dye localization, conjugation chemistry, and microenvironment on the optical properties of the probes. Dyes were attached to icosahedral cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) and rod-shaped tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) through a range of chemistries to target particular side chains displayed at specific locations around the virus. The fluorescence intensity and lifetime of the particles were determined, first using photochemical experiments on the benchtop, and second in imaging experiments using tissue culture experiments. The virus-based optical probes were found to be extraordinarily robust under ultrashort, pulsed laser light conditions with a significant amount of excitation energy, maintaining structural and chemical stability. The most effective fluorescence output was achieved through dye placement at optimized densities coupled to the exterior surface avoiding conjugated ring systems. Lifetime measurements indicate that fluorescence output depends not only on spacing the fluorophores, but also on dimer stacking and configurational changes leading to radiationless relaxation-and these processes are related to the conjugation chemistry and nanoparticle shape. For biological applications, the particles were also examined in tissue culture, from which it was found that the optical properties differed from those found on the benchtop due to effects from cellular processes and uptake kinetics. Data indicate that fluorescent cargos are released in the endolysosomal compartment of the cell targeted by the virus-based optical probes. These studies provide insight into the optical properties and fates of fluorescent proteinaceous imaging probes. The cellular release of cargo has implications not only for virus-based optical probes, but also for drug delivery and release systems.
Fluorescent nanomaterials
including nanostructures formed by viruses
and protein cages have become versatile tools as photonic materials
for a variety of applications, such as sensing,[1,2] light
harvesting,[3] and optical imaging.[4,5] Virus-based nanostructures are self-assembling systems that are
highly symmetrical, dynamic, polyvalent, and monodisperse, rendering
them one of the most advanced nanomaterials produced in nature. The
proteinaceous capsid’s function is to protect the nucleic acid
cargo; hence, their structures are extremely robust. Many structures
have been solved to near-atomic resolution, allowing chemists, engineers,
and physicists to tailor materials with atomic precision. For example,
structure-based engineering allows the placement of metals with spatial
control at the atomic level through genetic control, yielding unique
plasmonic nanomaterials.[6] The propensity
to self-assemble into higher-order structures is another interesting
feature; for example, hybrid virus-like nanoparticles encapsulating
gold nanoparticles inside the virus shell were shown to crystallize
into lattices exhibiting properties of plasmonic metamaterials.[7] The structure of viral nanoparticles (VNPs) can
be modified in several ways to allow for the loading of photonic and
plasmonic materials within the internal cavity or conjugated to the
exterior surfaces.[8]Within the medical
sector, virus-based probes combined with optical
dyes are frequently used to study their biodistribution[9−11] and to evaluate cellular internalization and localization.[12,13] Fluorescently labeled virus-based materials can also be applied
as tags for high-throughput flow cytometry applications.[14] Last but not least, virus-based materials labeled
with fluorophores have been demonstrated as excellent tools in optical
and molecular imaging. For example, cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV), which
naturally targets mammalian cells via interaction with surface expressed
vimentin,[15,16] has been applied to imaging of tumor neovasculature
as well as the inflamed endothelium sites at which surface vimentin
is upregulated.[4,16,17] Other approaches include genetic or chemical incorporation of receptor-specific
peptide ligands, which enables tissue-specific imaging in various
preclinical animal models.[5,18]It is clear that
fluorescently labeled virus-based materials have
become popular materials spanning a variety of applications in materials
and medicine. While a variety of virus-based probes have been reported
in the literature, detailed studies about their optical properties
have not been reported. Therefore, we set out to determine the impact
of spatial dye placement, dye density, conjugation chemistry, and
microenvironment using an icosahedral platform, CPMV, measuring 30
nm in diameter, as well as the elongated and stiff rods formed by
tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), measuring 300 × 18 nm. Distinct sets
of fluorescently labeled CPMV and TMV nanoparticles were synthesized,
and their optical properties were studied on the benchtop as well
as in cellular environments. A combination of steady-state and time-resolved
fluorescence measurements and flow cytometry and confocal microscopy
was used. The overall goal of this study was to define some design
rules for the construction of virus-based optical probes and to define
their stability and fluorescence output in different settings. Understanding
these properties is expected to help drive the development of fluorescent-based
VNPs for applications in biophotonics and plasmonics.
Results and Discussion
Fluorescent
Labeling of CPMV and TMV
The surface chemistry
of CPMV and TMV is well understood. The 30-nm-sized CPMV displays
300 addressable lysine side chains per particle (Figure 1A), all of which are addressable using N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-activated esters at large molar excess and
overnight incubation.[19,20] TMV forms a hollow tube measuring
300 × 18 nm with a 4-nm-wide interior channel. Its surface chemistry
inside and out is well established. Native TMV contains solvent-exposed
and addressable interior glutamic acids, Glu97 and Glu106 residues,
which can be modified using carbodiimide coupling reactions. The exterior
surface contains a solvent-exposed tyrosine side chain, Tyr139, which
can be targeted and functionalized using diazonium coupling reactions.[21] For our studies, we also considered a lysine
mutant, TMVLys,[22] which displays
a genetically introduced lysine residue that replaces threonine at
amino acid position 158. TMV consists of 2130 identical copies of
its coat protein, which means that overall TMV displays 4260 solvent-exposed
glutamic acids on the interior of the particle and 2130 addressable
tyrosines on its exterior surface; the TMVLys mutants offers
an additional 2130 surface-exposed lysine side chains on the exterior
particle surface (Figure 1B).
Figure 1
Schematic of CPMV and
TMV modifications. (a,b) Structures of CPMV
and TMV with amino acid residues available for modification shown
on a single coat protein. (c) Labeling of CPMV with sulfo-Cy5 NHS
ester. (d) Conjugation to interior glutamic acid residues through
EDC coupling. (e) Exterior modification of tyrosine residues through
diazonium coupling. (f) Conjugation of lysine mutant through NHS chemistry.
(g) Click chemistry for dye attachment, with structure of sCy5 the
same as shown in (c).
Schematic of CPMV and
TMV modifications. (a,b) Structures of CPMV
and TMV with amino acid residues available for modification shown
on a single coat protein. (c) Labeling of CPMV with sulfo-Cy5NHSester. (d) Conjugation to interior glutamic acid residues through
EDC coupling. (e) Exterior modification of tyrosine residues through
diazonium coupling. (f) Conjugation of lysine mutant through NHS chemistry.
(g) Click chemistry for dye attachment, with structure of sCy5 the
same as shown in (c).CPMV was labeled with cyanine dye sulfo-Cy5 using NHS-activatedesters targeting surface lysines (Figure 1C).
CPMV was incubated with NHS-sCy5 at various molar excesses yielding
CPMV-sCy5 conjugates with varying densities of dye per particle. After
completion of the reaction, the resulting CPMV-sCy5 conjugates were
purified by dialysis using centrifugal filter units; the conjugates
were characterized using a combination of UV–vis spectroscopy,
native and denaturing gel electrophoresis, and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM).UV–vis spectroscopy was used to determine
the degree of
labeling. Absorbance was measured and the Beer–Lambert law
and the fluorophore- and CPMV-specific extinction coefficients were
used to determine the number of dyes per particle formulation. Molar
excesses ranging from 1000 to 8000 dyes per particle were used to
obtain formulations with 8, 20, 27, 40, 48, 55 sCy5 per CPMV particle
(Supporting Information Figure S1). Native
and denaturing gel electrophoresis confirmed covalent attachment of
the dyes, and TEM imaging confirmed that the particles remained structurally
sound after chemical modification (see below).We next turned
to TMV and its mutant TMVLys, which offer
attractive platforms to evaluate how spatial dye placement, conjugation
chemistry, and microenvironment would affect the fluorescence properties
of the nanoparticle probes. The conjugation with sCy5 was achieved
using a two-step protocol: first, alkyne ligation handles were introduced,
and second, copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (“click”
chemistry) was carried out to introduce sCy5 azide. To decorate the
interior surface, a terminal alkyne was incorporated into the interior
channel of TMV by targeting glutamic acid residues, designated TMV-iAlk.[21] To decorate the exterior TMV surface, tyrosine
residues were targeted with the diazonium salt generated from 3-ethynylaniline
to yield TMV-eAlk.[23] Similarly, to target
exterior lysine residues using the TMVLys mutant, an NHS-active
ester was used to introduce alkynes to yield TMVLys-eAlk.
The reaction schemes are shown in Figure 1D–G.Alkyne labeling was carried out under forcing conditions, i.e.,
a large molar excess of alkyne to TMV and/or overnight incubation,
to yield maximum conversion of the carboxylic acid, hydroxyphenyl
ring, or amine functional groups into alkynes. In brief, 25 molar
excess of propargylamine per coat protein was reacted using EDC coupling
overnight to produce TMV-iAlk, 35 equiv of ethynylaniline diazonium
salt was reacted for 30 min to yield TMV-eAlk, and 10 molar excess
of NHS-alkyne was reacted overnight with TMVLys to form
TMVLys-eAlk. To conjugate fluorophores to the TMV nanoparticles,
TMV-iAlk, TMV-eAlk, and TMVLys-eAlk were incubated with
sCy5 azide at various molar excesses yielding TMV-i-sCy5, TMV-e-sCy5,
and TMVLys-e-sCy5 conjugates with varying densities of
dye per particle. After completion of the reaction, the resulting
TMV(Lys)-e/i-sCy5 conjugates were purified by ultracentrifugation;
the conjugates were characterized using a combination of UV–vis
spectroscopy, native and denaturing gel electrophoresis, and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) (see below).As in the case of CPMV,
UV–vis spectroscopy was used to
determine the degree of labeling, with the minor adjustment of using
TMV-specific extinction coefficients to determine the number of dyes
per particle formulation. For TMV-i-sCy5, molar excesses from 0.2
to 6 dyes per coat protein (426 to 12 780 per particle) were
used to obtain 68, 97, 222, 299, 402, 488, and 555 sCy5 per TMV particle;
for TMV-e-sCy5, excesses from 0.3 to 6 dyes per coat protein resulted
in 124, 164, 324, 396, 509, and 613 sCy5 per particle; and for TMVLys-sCy5, excesses ranging from 0.02 to 2 sCy5 per coat protein
were used to obtain 81, 165, 234, 302, and 365 dyes per particle (Supporting Information Figure S2). Aggregation
occurred for TMVLys above a molar excess of 2, with very
little increase in labeling efficiency observed. Denaturing gel electrophoresis
confirmed covalent attachment of the dyes and TEM imaging confirmed
that the particles remained structurally sound after chemical modification
(see below).
Fluorescence Properties of CPMV- and TMV-Dye
Conjugates
To evaluate the fluorescence properties of CPMV
and TMV-dye conjugates,
steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements were carried
out (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 2
Lifetime and fluorescence characterization of CPMV-sCy5
formulations.
(a) Fluorescence lifetime decay measurements as a function of dye
number for CPMV-sCy5. (b) Fluorescence intensity measurements normalized
for dye concentration (left) and protein concentration (right).
Figure 3
Lifetime and fluorescence
characterization of TMV-sCy5 for different
formulations. (a, c, e) Lifetime decay measurements as a function
of dye number for TMV-i-sCy5, TMV-e-sCy5, and TMVLys-sCy5,
respectively. (b, d, f) Fluorescence intensity measurements normalized
for dye concentration (left) and protein concentration (right) for
TMV-i-sCy5, TMV-e-sCy5, and TMVLys-sCy5, respectively.
Here, time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy is primarily
employed to evaluate the lifetime of excitonic states and to differentiate
between various processes leading to photoluminescence dimming. Short-lived
excitonic states (picoseconds time scale) are mainly related to radiationless
transitions between donors and acceptors located in close proximity
(few nanometers), mostly resulting in fluorescence quenching. However,
many molecular events such as rotational diffusion, resonance energy
transfer, dimer trapping, and dynamic quenching occur on the same
time scale as fluorescence decay. Thus, it is of vital importance
to discriminate between the causes of the fluorescence quenching to
design effective systems.CPMV-sCy5 with dye loading between
8 and 55 dyes per CPMV were
compared (data were normalized for dye or CPMV concentration, respectively).
It was apparent that the sample with highest fluorescence intensity
(FI) was not the sample with highest dye content: CPMV displaying
27 sCy5 dyes gave a fluorescence reading of 4768 cts, which is over
2.5 times the fluorescence intensity of 1795 cts for CPMV with 55
dyes at the same particle concentration. This indicates that maximum
fluorescence intensity is achieved at sparse labeling with ∼30
dyes per particle; as the dye density increases, fluorescence quenching
occurs, reducing the overall emission intensity. It is well-known
that fluorescent molecules in close proximity (d <
10 nm) undergo interactions and couplings that may lead to resonant
excitation energy transfer processes due to the partial overlap of
their absorption and emission curves.[24−26] This phenomenon is referred
to as Förster resonant energy transfer (FRET) and involves
a donor fluorophore in an excited electronic state, which may transfer
its excitation energy to a nearby acceptor chromophore in a nonradiative
way through long-range dipole–dipole interactions. FRET processes
are associated with the observation of fluorescence quenching and
reduction of emission decay times. It is also known that FRET strongly
depends on the distance between donor and acceptor molecules and scales
as R–6, where R is the molecular interdistance.
Increasing the number of sCy5 dye molecules per CPMV results in a
decrease of the distance between dye molecules and consequently leads
to stronger dipolar coupling between them (Supporting
Information Figure S3; the spacing between dye molecules was
calculated based on the average distance between each dye’s
nearest neighbor in multiple simulations where the dyes were randomly
positioned on the available Lys side chains (the coordinates were
determined from the structure of CPMV, which is available at viperdb.scripps.edu,
file 1NY7).The proximity of excitons is commonly considered
to be responsible
for fluorescence quenching. While the proximity does contribute to
the overall optical properties of the CPMV-based probes, additional
factors must be considered. In particular, the experimental evidence
suggests that three radiation-less processes govern the disposition
of the electronic excited state energy in this type of system: (i)
energy transfer between dye molecules, (ii) trapping by dimers, and
(iii) radiationless relaxation of the excited state. Dipolar coupling
along with the intrinsic spectral overlap between absorption and emission
bands create the conditions for an effective FRET. In the case of
CPMV, fluorescence intensity measurements show an initial monotonic
increase of emission as a function of the dye molecules for CPMV,
and the maximum value is obtained for 27 dyes/CPMV. At this density,
the average interdye separation is estimated to be about 8 nm and
lifetime decay was measured to be longer than 1 ns, indicating the
absolute absence of coupling between molecules. Above this level of
loading the average separation distance between dye molecules become
short enough to induce strong molecular coupling and to trigger FRET
processes, causing a reduction of the emission. This was accompanied
by a reduction of the fluorescence decay time by 43%, confirming that
dye coupling and energy transfer are behind this effect (see Figure 2). However, this fluorescence lifetime reduction
is not compatible with the formation of trapped dimers, which usually
show much shorter decay time (<100 ps). This indicates that dimers
undergo rapid configurational changes, which enhance the radiationless
relaxation rates.Lifetime and fluorescence characterization of CPMV-sCy5
formulations.
(a) Fluorescence lifetime decay measurements as a function of dye
number for CPMV-sCy5. (b) Fluorescence intensity measurements normalized
for dye concentration (left) and protein concentration (right).With regard to the fluorescence,
similar trends were observed when
comparing the TMV samples; the underlying photophysics however differed.
Each sample reached a plateau at a specific dye-to-TMV ratio, and
this was dependent on the spatial placement and independent of the
chemistry processes. Specifically, for either of the externally labeled
TMV samples, maximum FI was reached upon attachment of 165 sCy5 dyes
to either tyrosine or lysine side chains. On the other hand, much
higher dye loading was required to reach a maximal fluorescence intensity
(FI) of 774 cts for TMV-i-sCy5 labeled with 402 sCy5 (Figure 3). When measuring the FI values of the exteriorly
labeled particles with the same density of 165 dyes attached, we found
that TMVLys-e-sCy5 reached an intensity of 1616 cts, which
was 4.5 times higher compared to the FI value of 354 cts observed
for TMV-e-sCy5. This evidence of a lower quantum yield for TMV-e-sCy5
can be related to the formation of dimers. In fact, it is important
to note that lifetime measurements show very short-lived excitonic
states (τ ≤ 100 ps), indicative of dimer trapping, above
300 dyes/TMV. It is possible that the planar shape of the tyrosine
residue results in stacking of the sCy5 dyes on the high aspect ratio,
flat TMV structure, therefore resulting in dimer trapping. In contrast,
steady-state fluorescence data for TMV-i-sCy5 and TMVLys-e-sCy5 show higher values of FI with respect TMV-e-sCy5 (see Figure 3). Such evidence of the importance of conjugation
chemistry is additionally corroborated by comparable decay times (τ
≥ 400 ps) for the systems showing higher FI.Lifetime and fluorescence
characterization of TMV-sCy5 for different
formulations. (a, c, e) Lifetime decay measurements as a function
of dye number for TMV-i-sCy5, TMV-e-sCy5, and TMVLys-sCy5,
respectively. (b, d, f) Fluorescence intensity measurements normalized
for dye concentration (left) and protein concentration (right) for
TMV-i-sCy5, TMV-e-sCy5, and TMVLys-sCy5, respectively.It was interesting to note that
stark differences were observed
when comparing the various formulations. Normalized for particle concentration,
the brightest CPMV sample (CPMV-sCy5 with 27 dyes) resulted in fluorescence
intensities four times higher (FI ∼ 4768 cts) than the brightest
TMV sample (TMVLys-e-sCy5, FI ∼ 1616 cts), despite
both samples having comparable dye concentrations in the range of
0.2 to 0.3 mg/mL. For the brightest TMV samples, TMV-i-sCy5 had an
intermediate FI about twice that of TMV-e-sCy5, while the brightest
TMV sample across the board was TMVLys-e-sCy5 reaching
a FI another factor of 2 times that of TMV-i-sCy5. These data indicate
that not only spatial placement (inside versus outside), conjugation
chemistry (see Figure 1), and dye density,
but also nanoparticle shape and microenvironment dictate the fluorescence
properties of (virus-based) nanoparticles. Time-resolved fluorescence
measurements play a key role in gaining further insight in the processes
behind the change of the radiative emission rate of the fluorophores.
The measurements allow us to understand whether fluorescence quantum
yield is affected by the chemical microenvironment or energy transport.
At low values of dyes/TMV, electronic excited state energy transport
occurs due to dipole–dipole interactions between the dye molecules,
and the energy transport causes fluorescence depolarization effects
while not affecting the fluorescence quantum yield.The lowest
FIs, accompanied by corresponding shortest fluorescence
decay times (τ ≤ 100 ps), were observed when studying
the TMV-e-sCy5 samples. This can be explained by the conjugation chemistry
and the formation of dimers. In this case, the fluorophores were placed
on the aromatic tyrosine residues via diazonium bonds, and electron
delocalization in the conjugated ring systems induces a reduction
of the spontaneous emission rate. It is generally more effective to
conjugate dyes via nonaromatic systems to avoid quenching. On the
other hand, the formation of dimers, as proven by the very short-lived
states, represents a configuration with the fastest channel to release
the excitation energy nonradiatively because of their extremely rapid
conformational changes.TMVLys-e-sCy5 reached higher
FIs compared to those obtained
for the TMV-i-sCy5; this may be explained by spatial localization:
internal placement results in crowding of the dyes. The average distance
of dyes in the TMV-i-sCy5 sample containing 402 dyes is 3 nm, compared
to 8 nm for TMV-e-sCy5 and TMVLys-e-sCy5 with 165 dyes
(see Supporting Information Figure S3).
As 8 nm was also the interdye distance found for CPMV-sCy5 with 27
dyes, this is likely the optimal distance for sCy5 dyes spread along
the exterior viral capsid wall. Indeed, the rate of energy transfer
is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the distance between
the donor and acceptor. Therefore, the efficiency of the transfer
rapidly declines to zero at distances larger than the Förster
radius. Förster radii have been experimentally determined for
each specific donor–acceptor pair, and the majority of fluorophore
pairs fall within the 5–10 nm range.[27−29] Since the interior
channel of TMV is only 4 nm wide, decreasing the dye labels to 165
dyes for TMV-i-sCy5 only increases the distance between dyes to about
3.6 nm. The balance between improving the fluorescence per dye through
less dyes per particle to decrease the amount of quenching and increasing
the fluorescence per particle by having more dye labels per particle
is therefore altered for TMV-i-sCy5 compared to the other particles.
Fluorescence lifetime data corroborates this explanation. In fact,
the decay times of both TMVLys-e-sCy5 and TMV-e-sCy5 decrease
linearly with the dye molecule number, whereas the decay times of
TMV-i-sCy5 shows a saturation effect by reaching a plateau around
400 ps at a loading value of 222 dyes per particle.Overall,
these data indicate that design principles beyond interdye
spacing must be considered to develop optical probes with maximized
fluorescent output: interdye-spacing can be calculated based on the
averaged distance between each dye’s nearest neighbors; dye-loading
can be optimized through adjustment of the conjugation protocol (excess
reagents used and incubation time). To avoid dimer trapping, dyes
should be placed to avoid crowding and/or attachment via conjugated
ring systems. To overcome losses due to configurational interactions
leading to enhanced radiationless relaxation rates, one might consider
alternative linker chemistries that may affix the fluorophore in stringent
chemical positions.These quantitative data were correlated
with results from gel electrophoresis
analysis of CPMV- and TMV-dye conjugates. Samples with highest FI
were compared to samples with higher dye loading but lower FI. Specifically,
CPMV and CPMV-sCy5 with 27 and 55 dyes per particle as well as TMVLys and TMVLys-e-sCy5 containing 165 and 365 dyes
were analyzed by gel electrophoresis. First, CPMV samples were separated
using native agarose gels (TMV cannot be analyzed under these experimental
conditions, and therefore only denaturing gel analysis was performed).
After electrophoretic separation of intact CPMV in native agarose
gels, the particles were visualized under UV light as well as Maestro
2D fluorescence imaging system with a yellow (635 nm) long-pass filter
and then stained with Coomassie blue followed by imaging under white
light (Figure 4A). The mobility of CPMV in
the native gel increases upon dye conjugation; the sCy5 dye is a negatively
charged molecule, so as more dyes are conjugated to CPMV, the more
negative the surface properties of CPMV (see also Supporting Information Figure S4). This enhances the mobility
of CPMV-sCy5 toward the positively charged anode as a function of
dye-loading. CPMV-sCy5 with 55 sCy5 molecules has the highest mobility
compared to CPMV-sCy5 with 27 sCy5 dyes, and native CPMV has the slowest
mobility. Analysis of the fluorescence signal intensity (Figure 4A, heat map) shows that CPMV-sCy5 with 27 sCy5 dyes
has a higher fluorescence intensity compared to its counterpart displaying
55 dyes per particle, therefore further confirming the fluorescence
lifetime and intensity measurements (see Figure 2).
Figure 4
Gel electrophoresis of particles used for cell studies. (a) Particles
run on a 1.2% agarose gel visualized with fluorescence imaging (635
nm long-pass filter) and corresponding heat map, UV light, and after
Coomassie staining: 1 = CPMV, 2 = CPMV-sCy5 with 27 dyes; 3 = CPMV-sCy5
with 55 dyes. (b) Particles on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel run in MES
buffer visualized with white light through a 635 nm long-pass filter,
fluorescence imaging (635 nm long-pass filter) and corresponding heat
map, and after Coomassie staining: 4 = TMV, 5 = TMVLys-sCy5
with 165 dyes, 6 = TMVLys-sCy5 with 365 dyes.
Gel electrophoresis of particles used for cell studies. (a) Particles
run on a 1.2% agarose gel visualized with fluorescence imaging (635
nm long-pass filter) and corresponding heat map, UV light, and after
Coomassie staining: 1 = CPMV, 2 = CPMV-sCy5 with 27 dyes; 3 = CPMV-sCy5
with 55 dyes. (b) Particles on 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel run in MES
buffer visualized with white light through a 635 nm long-pass filter,
fluorescence imaging (635 nm long-pass filter) and corresponding heat
map, and after Coomassie staining: 4 = TMV, 5 = TMVLys-sCy5
with 165 dyes, 6 = TMVLys-sCy5 with 365 dyes.While native gels separate intact viral nanoparticles,
in denaturing
gels the coat proteins are separated. CPMV consists of 60 copies each
of a small (24 kDa) and large (42 kDa) protein, and 2130 copies of
a single 15 kDa protein form TMV particles. Both the small and large
coat proteins of CPMV are detectable after electrophoretic separation
and show the expected sizes; it is apparent that fluorophores were
conjugated to both coat protein subunits. We hypothesize that the
sCy5 dyes are located around a fivefold axis of CPMV near the interface
of the small and large coat proteins where the most reactive lysines
(Lys38 and Lys99) are located (see Figure 1A).[19,20] The protein concentration between each sample
was consistent, which is confirmed by comparable signal intensities
in the Coomassie-stained gels. Analysis of the fluorescent signals
is consistent with UV/vis quantification of dye loading, as CPMV-sCy5
with 55 sCy5 dyes displays a higher dye per protein density compared
to CPMV-sCy5 with 27 sCy5 dyes. Since denatured proteins are imaged
in these gels, any quenching effects are lost (Figure 4B). Similarly, fluorescence signal from denaturing gel electrophoresis
of TMV samples also indicates a higher dye-to-protein ratio for TMV
samples labeled with more dyes (a brighter signal is observed for
TMVLys-e-sCy5 containing 365 dyes versus 165 dyes and TMVLys is not fluorescent, Figure 4B).
Stability of Fluorescently Labeled CPMV and TMV
We
assessed the stability of CPMV and TMV conjugates, specifically addressing
the question of whether CPMV and TMV-dye conjugates remain structurally
sound and whether the dyes would remain covalently attached during
fluorescence lifetime measurements. After lifetime measurements, the
CPMV- and TMV-sCy5 conjugates were evaluated using TEM and native
gel electrophoresis (Supporting Information Figure
S4). The combination of methods provides insights into the
structural integrity as measured by direct TEM imaging, and chemical
stability as measured by detection and quantification of the covalent
modifications. After completion of electrophoretic separation, CPMV
bands were visualized under UV light. The electrophoretic mobility
of the bands did not alter before and after measurements, indicating
that the particles remain structurally sound and the fluorophores
remain covalently attached; no free dye was detectable for any of
the samples analyzed, therefore indicating that chemical stability
is maintained. These data were in good agreement with TEM analysis
of the samples, with the CPMV and TMV samples all found to be intact
(Supporting Information Figure S4).In addition, unlabeled CPMV samples were exposed to various pulse
and power settings using various laser beams, both pulsed and continuous
wave (CW), to test their stability under optical excitation. Different
parameters, such as pulse duration, energy per pulse, repetition rate,
wavelength, and average power, were selected to mimic various scenarios
relevant to photonics and plasmonic applications (future direction);
detailed procedures are described in the Supporting
Information (see also Supporting Information Figures S5 and S6). In short, both CPMV and TMV were found to be
very robust and stable; being able to endure significantly high excitation
energy fluence for a high range of wavelengths makes them suitable
candidates for biophotonic applications. Optical excitation by means
of trains of ultrashort pulses (about 100 fs) represents a very strict
physical requirement to understand radiative and nonradiative mechanisms
between excitonic molecules. The virus particle stability has been
investigated under severe optical excitation upon varying several
physical parameters (wavelength, pulse duration, energy/pulse, and
repetition rate) with the precise aim to evaluate stability and tolerances
to be used for optical spectroscopies.
Fluorescently Labeled CPMV
and TMV in Cell Imaging Applications
We then set out to determine
whether the properties observed in
the test tube would translate into cell imaging studies. We continued
with both CPMV and TMV to additionally evaluate shape-dependent effects,
specifically choosing to study TMVLys since it had superior
fluorescent properties to internally and externally labeled wild-type
particles. Fluorescence and lifetime measurements indicated that a
CPMV formulation labeled at external lysine side chains with 27 sCy5
dyes is brighter (FI ∼ 4768 cts) compared to a CPMV sample
labeled at external lysines with 55 sCy5 (FI ∼ 1795 cts). Similarly,
TMV labeled with 165 sCy5 dyes on its genetically introduced, exterior
lysine side chain was brighter (FI ∼ 1616 cts) compared to
TMV samples labeled with 365 dyes conjugated using the same chemistry
(FI ∼ 539 cts). To test the hypothesis that CPMV-sCy527 and TMVLys-e-sCy5165 would outperform their
counterparts with higher dye loading (but reduced fluorescence intensity
due to quenching), we performed quantitative flow cytometry studies
using HeLa cells; these studies were complemented by confocal imaging
studies (Figure 5).
Figure 5
Cell interactions of
CPMV-sCy5 and TMVLys-e-sCy5. (a)
Flow cytometry studies with mean fluorescence intensity from CPMV
antibody staining with Alexa Fluor 555 secondary (striped bars) and
from sCy5 labels on the particles (solid bars). (b) Flow cytometry
quantifying the percent of cells positive for TMV uptake determined
from TMV antibody staining with Alexa Fluor 555 secondary (striped
bars) and from sCy5 labels on the particles (solid bars), obtained
from the indicated regions in the histograms to the left. (c,d) Confocal
imaging of HeLa cells showing cellular uptake of CPMV-sCy5 and TMVLys-e-sCy5 after 3 h. Nuclei are shown in blue, endolysosomes
stained with mouse anti-human Lamp-1 antibody and secondary Alexa
Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse antibody are shown in green, and CPMV-sCy5
and TMVLys-e-sCy5 are shown in red. Colocalization is shown
in yellow, with associated Manders’ coefficient as indicated.
Scale bars = 20 μm.
Cell interactions of
CPMV-sCy5 and TMVLys-e-sCy5. (a)
Flow cytometry studies with mean fluorescence intensity from CPMV
antibody staining with Alexa Fluor 555 secondary (striped bars) and
from sCy5 labels on the particles (solid bars). (b) Flow cytometry
quantifying the percent of cells positive for TMV uptake determined
from TMV antibody staining with Alexa Fluor 555 secondary (striped
bars) and from sCy5 labels on the particles (solid bars), obtained
from the indicated regions in the histograms to the left. (c,d) Confocal
imaging of HeLa cells showing cellular uptake of CPMV-sCy5 and TMVLys-e-sCy5 after 3 h. Nuclei are shown in blue, endolysosomes
stained with mouse anti-humanLamp-1 antibody and secondary Alexa
Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse antibody are shown in green, and CPMV-sCy5
and TMVLys-e-sCy5 are shown in red. Colocalization is shown
in yellow, with associated Manders’ coefficient as indicated.
Scale bars = 20 μm.In brief, CPMV or TMV-based sensors were incubated with HeLa
cells
at a concentration of 5 × 105 particles per cell;
cells were collected at 30 min and 3 h post incubation with CPMV or
TMV, fixed, permeabilized, and stained with anti-CPMV or anti-TMV
antibodies and fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies. This allowed
detection of the signals derived from the fluorophores conjugated
to the plant virus-based nanoparticles as well as imaging of the nanoparticles
through antibody staining.In the case of CPMV, antibody staining
indicated that the more
dyes are conjugated, the more efficiently CPMV nanoparticles are being
internalized by the cells, and this effect is more profound at longer
incubation times (Figure 5A). It should be
noted that flow cytometry does not differentiate between bound and
internalized nanoparticles; however, cell uptake was confirmed by
confocal microscopy (Figure 5C). Increased
cell uptake with increasing numbers of dyes was also observed when
studying the TMV formulations (Figure 5B).
Increased cell uptake as a function of dye-loading could be explained
by sCy5 dye–cell membrane interactions. It may also be possible
that altered surface charges contribute to the cell uptake efficiency;
however, conjugation of the sCy5 dye contributes to an increased negative
charge of the plant virus-based nanoparticles (e.g., see Figure 4); first, the sCy5 itself is negatively charged,
and second, conjugation to the surface lysine residues reduces the
positive charge contributions. Cell membranes are negatively charged,
and therefore positively charged materials interact more strongly
with cells.[30−32] We hypothesize that the planar, hydrophobic structure
of the sCy5 dye interacts directly with the lipid bilayer of the cell
membrane to promote cell binding, which then may trigger endocytosis
of the nanoparticles. We had previously observed that when potato
virus X (PVX) nanoparticles are modified with PEG of a molecular weight
of 2000 Da and Alexa Fluor 647, cell interactions are enhanced compared
to non-PEGylated PVX. In contrast, cell interactions are reduced when
PVX is labeled with the same PEG coating but displays Oregon Green
488 (instead of the Alexa Fluor 647 dye),[33] supporting the hypothesis that the fluorophore may play a role in
mediating cell interactions and uptake.Next, cell uptake (as
determined based on antibody staining) was
compared with the signal strength obtained when cells were imaged
based on the conjugated sCy5 dyes: the more dyes that are conjugated
the brighter the signals obtained from the cells (Figure 5A,B). The CPMV-sCy555 formulation had
a fluorescence signal approximately 1.5 times as strong as that of
the CPMV-sCy527 formulation (1.5 at 30 min and 1.6 at 2
h). On the other hand, cell uptake (based on the antibody staining)
of the CPMV-sCy555 formulation was even higher, with mean
antibody fluorescence 2.3 times as strong at that of the CPMV-sCy527 formulation. Taking the ratio (2.3:1.5), we find that the
CPMV-sCy527 formulation indeed is still brighter, with
a 1.5-fold higher fluorescence intensity per particle. Since the test
tube fluorescence intensity of CPMV-sCy527 was about 2.6-fold
stronger compared to that of CPMV-sCy555, this indicates
that the somewhat unexpected signal increase for the CPMV-sCy555 formulation can only be in part explained by the increased
cell uptake. Other factors may contribute to the fluorescence signal
enhancement. Confocal microscopy imaging and colocalization studies
indicate that CPMV samples are taken up by cells via endocytosis and
colocalize with the endolysosome (Lamp-1 marker, Mander’s colocalization
coefficient 0.83, Figure 5C). The endolysosome
is a low pH compartment with high protease and hydrolase activity,
which may at least in part lead to the dissociation or degradation
of the capsid proteins within the 3 h time frame; these structural
changes may relax the conformation and packing of the dyes, therefore
overcoming quenching and enhancing the fluorescence properties.In the case of TMV, cell uptake was generally less efficient and
only apparent after a 3 h incubation period using TMV displaying 365
sCy5 dyes per particle (Figure 6B). Cell uptake
and colocalization with the endolysosome was also confirmed (Figure 6D). The shape of the nanocarrier may explain the
reduced cell uptake: the high aspect ratio and stiff nature of the
TMV rod (300 × 18 nm) may reduce nonspecific cell interactions
and cell uptake kinetics.[34−37] It should be noted that targeting ligands were not
applied in this study; therefore, cell uptake depends on nonspecific
cell interactions, at least in the case of TMV.
Figure 6
Chemical stability of TMVLys-e-A488 in lysosomal extract
over time. (a) Representative SDS-PAGE results; data shown are obtained
after 1 day incubation of TMVLys-e-A488 in lysosomal extract.
After electrophoretic separation, gels were imaged first under UV
light, then stained with Coomassie staining and photographed under
white light. M = SeeBluePlus2 protein size standard, the molecular
weights (in kDa) are indicated on the left. 1 = BSA protein in KP
pH 7.0 (negative control, BSA protein and multimers are detected on
the gel), 2 = BSA in lysosomal extract (positive control demonstrating
protein degradation as expected), 3 = TMVLys-e-A488 in
pH 7.0, 4 = TMVLys-e-A488 in KP pH 5 (acidity has no effect
on the chemical stability), 5 = TMVLys-e-A488 in lysosomal
extract; release of the fluorophores are apparent. (b) Plots of fluorescence
to coat protein intensity (normalized to control lane 3) as measured
by lane analysis tool using ImageJ software. TMVLys-e-A488
in KP buffer at pH 7 and pH 5 remain stable, with the A488 stably
attached over time; A488 release is detected for TMVLys-e-A488 exposed to lysosomal extracts.
Manchester et
al. reported that, despite being a plant pathogen,
CPMV binds to and is internalized by mammalian cells through surface-expressed
vimentin, a protein that is overexpressed on tumor endothelial cells;[15,16] we demonstrated that this interaction can be exploited to target
CPMV-based nanoparticles to cancer cells, including HeLa cells expressing
surface vimentin.[38] Such receptor-specific
interactions have not been described for TMV. Therefore, differences
in surface chemistry and shape of the nanocarriers may explain their
distinct cell uptake behavior. Even though TMV cell uptake is negligible,
low level fluorescence signals are detectable and consistent with
findings reported for CPMV; the more dye conjugated to TMV, the more
efficient its cell uptake properties and the brighter the fluorescence
obtained from the conjugated sCy5 dye.Cell studies pinpoint
distinct fluorescent properties of VNPs in
cellular environments that do not match the properties determined
on the benchtop. These observations indicate structural changes or
metabolic degradation of the carrier after cell entry. To gain an
initial understanding of this phenomenon, we set out to determine
whether chemical stability of the virus-based optical probes was maintained
within the endolysosomal compartment. A fluorescently labeled TMVLys-e-A488 sample (conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488) was prepared
to enable visualization of fluorescent protein bands and free dye
under UV light after electrophoretic separation. TMVLys-e-A488 was incubated in a lysosomal extract obtained from liver
tissue of Balb/C mice; then, its integrity over time was examined.
Indeed, the data indicate release of the fluorescent cargo from the
coat proteins; the coat proteins, however, appeared to remain intact
even after several days of exposure (as measured by their molecular
weight; Figure 6). Cargo release was also evaluated
by exposure of the TMVLys-e-A488 sample to low pH. pH-triggered
release was not observed, therefore indicating that enzymatic activity
may cause the cleavage of the fluorescent cargo. In ongoing studies,
we are elucidating the underlying mechanism to determine the time
course and enzymes involved. The release of the fluorophores after
cell entry results in reduced quenching and hence increased fluorescence
output within the cell, which is consistent with the observations
made in the cell imaging study (see Figure 5).Chemical stability of TMVLys-e-A488 in lysosomal extract
over time. (a) Representative SDS-PAGE results; data shown are obtained
after 1 day incubation of TMVLys-e-A488 in lysosomal extract.
After electrophoretic separation, gels were imaged first under UV
light, then stained with Coomassie staining and photographed under
white light. M = SeeBluePlus2 protein size standard, the molecular
weights (in kDa) are indicated on the left. 1 = BSA protein in KP
pH 7.0 (negative control, BSA protein and multimers are detected on
the gel), 2 = BSA in lysosomal extract (positive control demonstrating
protein degradation as expected), 3 = TMVLys-e-A488 in
pH 7.0, 4 = TMVLys-e-A488 in KP pH 5 (acidity has no effect
on the chemical stability), 5 = TMVLys-e-A488 in lysosomal
extract; release of the fluorophores are apparent. (b) Plots of fluorescence
to coat protein intensity (normalized to control lane 3) as measured
by lane analysis tool using ImageJ software. TMVLys-e-A488
in KP buffer at pH 7 and pH 5 remain stable, with the A488 stably
attached over time; A488 release is detected for TMVLys-e-A488 exposed to lysosomal extracts.In summary, cell studies indicate distinct behavior of the
CPMV
and TMV carriers; CPMV exhibits favorable cell uptake properties.
Data indicate that dye-labeling influences cell interactions; the
more dyes that were conjugated, the stronger the cell interactions.
Fluorescent dyes are frequently used in preclinical evaluation of
nanocarriers for imaging or drug delivery; therefore it is important
to carefully evaluate and test each formulation to understand the
nonspecific (and potentially nondesired) contributions from organic
fluorophores on cell-specificity and uptake rates. While fluorescence
and lifetime measurements of CPMV and TMV with less dye exhibit enhanced
fluorescence properties, this may not translate into cell imaging
studies in vitro; altered cell uptake properties and chemical degradation
of the optical within the endolysosome results in brighter signals
from particles with increased dye loading.
Conclusions
Using
CPMV and TMV as scaffolds, we synthesized a set of fluorescent-labeled
virus-based nanoparticles. Our data show that density, spatial placement,
conjugation chemistry, and microenvironment affect the optical properties
of the probes. The brightest probes were obtained using CPMV with
sparse dye labeling (CPMV-sCy5 with 27 dyes); its fluorescence intensity
was about 3× higher compared to the brightest TMV sample (TMVLys-e-sCy5, FI ∼ 1616), even though both samples contain
comparable dye concentrations with dye distances estimated at ∼8
nm. This dye interdistance is the theoretical minimum to avoid coupling
and FRET that are responsible for photoluminescence quenching effects.
The differences between the probes may be explained by differences
in the microenvironment; it is possible that aromatic amino acids
in proximity to Lys158 on the TMV scaffold interfere with emission.
It is interesting to note that others have investigated the fluorescence
properties of dye-labeled CPMV and reported that CPMV labeled with
70 dyes of A488 or 120 dyes of A555 did not show any apparent quenching,[4] therefore indicating that the nature of the fluorophore
is another variable to consider. Conjugation chemistry matters; our
data confirm that coupling of fluorophores to aromatic tyrosine residues
via diazonium coupling results in probes the least bright, which is
consistent with electron delocalization in the conjugated ring systems
resulting in quenching. Last, placement of dyes on the interior capsid
surface is less efficient because of significant coupling of the densely
located fluorophores, and this is consistent using TMV (this study)
as well as CPMV.[39]Strikingly, stability
investigations show that viruses (CPMV and
TMV) can be exposed to pulsed laser light characterized by a significant
amount of excitation energy fluence while remaining intact. Ultrashort
pulses with different wavelengths and intensity, typically used for
laser spectroscopy studies, leave the structure of the virus unmodified
because of reduced absorption coefficient. The overall low absorbance
is responsible for moderate increase of the local temperature, therefore
avoiding effects of thermal denaturation of viruses.Finally,
cell studies indicate distinct behavior of the CPMV and
TMV carriers displaying dyes at various ratios. CPMV exhibits favorable
cell uptake properties compared to TMV, and this could be explained
by a combination of nanoparticle shape and molecular recognition.
The spherical shape of CPMV may enhance its cell uptake properties
compared to the stiff, elongated rod; further, CPMV targets surface-exposed
vimentin on HeLa cells, therefore mediating receptor-specific internalization.[15,16] Our data also demonstrate that dye-labeling influences cell interactions;
the more dyes that were conjugated, the stronger the cell interactions,
and this may be a result of the dye interacting with the cell membranes.
Because various fluorescent dyes are utilized in preclinical imaging
of targeted nanoparticles, it is important to use proper controls
to delineate and differentiate between effects from the fluorophore
versus targeting ligands. Furthermore, the brightest particles on
the bench may not necessarily result in the brightest candidates in
cells; our data indicate that the changing environment may affect
the structural and hence the optical properties of the fluorescent
probes. We provide insights into the fate of the optical probes in
cells. Our data indicate that enzymatic cleavage alters the fluorescence
of the optical probes in the cellular environment. Therefore, benchtop
testing of optical probes does not necessarily reflect their optical
properties in vivo.In summary, the rules for designing the
brightest probes are to
conjugate the fluorophores to the exterior surface targeting nonaromatic
residues and yielding a dye density with a dye distance of at least
8–10 nm; further, one should consider targeting various locations
on the capsid surface to minimize effects from the microenvironment
resulting in quenching; the latter could be achieved with VNPs through
genetic design and insertion of lysine side chains at various specified
locations. Furthermore, while the probes may exhibit extraordinary
stability on the benchtop, the cellular machinery, including proteases
and hydrolases, may contribute to structural changes, which impact
the optical properties in cells. This not only has implications for
applications of protein-based probes in optical imaging, but also
provides insights for their development as drug delivery vehicles
with a built-in cargo release strategy.
Experimental Section
Materials
Sulfo-Cy5 (sCy5) NHS ester and azide were
purchased from Lumiprobe (Hallandale Beach, FL). Propargylamine was
supplied from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO), n-hydroxybenzotriazole
(HOBt) from Chem-Impex International (Wood Dale, IL), ethyldimethylpropylcarbodiimide
(EDC) from Pierce Biotechnology (Rockford, IL), propargyl-NHS ester
from Click Chemistry Tools (Scottsdale, AZ), and 3-ethynylaniline
and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) from Fisher. HeLa cells were supplied
from ATCC (Manassas, VA). Cell culture reagents minimal essential
medium (MEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), l-glutamine, and
penicillin–streptomycin (pen-strep), as well as secondary goat
anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 488 antibody were purchased from Life Technologies
(Grand Island, NY). Mouse anti-humanLAMP-1 came from Biolegend (San
Diego, CA).
Propagation and Purification of CPMV and
TMV/TMVLys
CPMV was propagated using Vigna unguiculata (black eyed peas) plants, and wild-type
TMV and TMVLys mutants[22] were
propagated using Nicotiana benthamiana plants (a tobacco species).
CPMV[40] and TMV/TMVLys[41] particles were purified from infected leaves
using established procedures yielding 100 mgs of CPMV or TMV/TMVLys per 100 g infected leaf material.
Bioconjugation
For CPMV, reactions were carried out
with 1000 to 8000 mol equiv of sCy5 NHS ester per particle at a final
concentration of 2 mg/mL CPMV in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer
(pH 7.0) with 10% (v/v) DMSO. The resultant CPMV-sCy5 was purified
using centrifugal filter units with a 10 kDa molecular weight cutoff
(Millipore). TMV and TMVLys click reactions were all two-step
reactions: alkyne handles were first added to the particles, then
sCy5 azide was attached through Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne
cycloaddition (CuAAC). For TMV-iAlk, 25 molar excess of propargylamine
per coat protein was reacted using EDC coupling with 45 molar excess
of both EDC and HOBt at a final concentration of 2 mg/mL TMV in HEPES
buffer. For TMV-eAlk, 35 equiv of 3-ethynylaniline diazonium salt
formed by mixing 400 μL of 0.3 M p-toluenesulfonic
acid monohydrate with 75 μL of 0.68 M 3-ethynylaniline and 25
μL of 3.0 M sodium nitrite for an hour on ice protected from
light was added to TMV at a final concentration of 2 mg/mL TMV in
borate buffer for 30 min on ice protected from light. For TMVLys-eAlk, the same reaction conditions as for CPMV were used,
except 10 equiv of propargyl-NHS ester per coat protein were added.
TMV-iAlk, TMV-eAlk, and TMVLys-eAlk were then mixed with
sCy5 azide at molar excesses ranging from 0.2 to 6 dyes per coat protein
for TMV-iAlk, 0.3 to 6 for TMV-eAlk, and 0.02 to 2 per coat protein
for TMVLys-eAlk at final concentrations of 1 mg/mL TMV
in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) for 30 min on ice with
2 mM aminoguanidine, 2 mM ascorbic acid sodium salt, and 1 mM copper
sulfate. The reaction was then stopped with 2.5 mM EDTA. TMVLys-e-A488 used for stability studies through exposure to lysosomal
extracts was synthesized via an overnight reaction using TMVLys and Alexa Fluor488 (A488) succinimidyl ester at a molar excess of
10 A488 per coat protein in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer containing
10% DMSO by volume. All reactions were purified through ultracentrifugation
purification. Yields after purification for each reaction step are
80–90% (as measured based on protein concentration).
UV–vis
Spectroscopy
To determine the dye attachment
density, the concentrations of the particles and dyes were determined
using UV–vis spectroscopy. The particle-specific extinction
coefficient at 260 nm is 8.1 mg–1 mL cm–1 for CPMV and 3 mg–1 mL cm–1 for
TMV, while the extinction coefficient of sCy5 at 646 nm is 271 000
M–1 cm–1 and the extinction coefficient
of AF488 at 495 nm is 73 000 M–1 cm–1. It should be noted that both TMV and CPMV are RNA viruses; the
encapsulated RNA molecules result in increased absorbance at 260 nm
(versus 280 nm absorbance derived from the protein shell).
Transmission
Electron Microscopy (TEM)
Carbon-coated
copper TEM grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) were placed over 20
μL drops of particles diluted to 0.1 mg/mL with deionized water.
The particles were allowed to adsorb for 5 min, and then the grid
was briefly rinsed with deionized water followed by negative staining
with 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate for 1 min. Samples were observed using
a Zeiss Libra 200FE transmission electron microscope operated at 200
kV.
Gel Electrophoresis
Native particles were analyzed
by 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis (1 h at 100 V) in 1×
TBE running buffer with ethidium bromide. Individual coat proteins
were analyzed by denaturing 4–12% NuPAGE (Invitrogen) polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (50 min at 200 V) in 1× MOPS running buffer.
The gels were stained with Coomassie for protein content. Images of
the gels were taken using an AlphaImager imaging system (Biosciences)
for UV and white light images and a Maestro 2D fluorescence imaging
system with yellow excitation and emission filters for fluorescent
images.
Fluorescence Measurements
50 μL of dye-labeled
CPMV and TMV diluted in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer were added
in triplicate to a black 384-well plate at concentrations of 2.5 μM
sCy5, 50 nM CPMV, or 5 nM TMV. Fluorescence intensity was measured
using a Tecan Infinite 200 plate reader with excitation/emission wavelengths
of 600 and 665 nm.
Lifetime Measurements
For lifetime
measurements, a
well-established and advanced technique based on ultrafast time correlated
single-photon counting spectroscopy (TCSPC) was used. Samples were
excited by means of an ultrafast pulsed light source at 4 MHz, with
a pulse duration of 140 fs, at a wavelength of 360 nm. The exciting
light was produced by a Ti:sapphire laser (model Chamaleon by Coherent)
coupled to a second harmonic generator (SHG) module and to a pulse
picker. This arrangement allowed synchronization of the exciting pulses
with the acquisition card of a multipronged spectrofluorometer (Edinburgh)
equipped with a last generation MCP-PMT (microchannel plate photomultiplier)
for detecting fluorescence light and measuring fluorescence lifetime
(time resolution ∼5 ps). The decay time data were fitted with
multiexponential functions f(t)
= A1 × exp(−t/τ1) + A2 × exp(−t/τ2) + ···, while the average
decay times were calculated by means of a weighted average τ
= (A1 × τ1 + A2 × τ2 + ···)/(A1 + A2 + ···).
Flow Cytometry
HeLa cells were grown in MEM supplemented
with 10% (v/v) FBS, 1% (v/v) l-glutamine, and 1% (v/v) pen-strep
at 37 °C in 5% CO2. The cells were seeded at a density
of 5 000 000 cells/200 μL MEM/well onto an untreated
96-well v-bottom plate. Particles were added in triplicate at a concentration
of 500 000 CPMV or TMV per cell and incubated for 3 h. Free
particles were then removed by washing the cells twice through centrifugation
at 500 × g for 4 min, gently removing the supernatant,
and resuspending the cells in FACS buffer (0.1 mL of 0.5 M EDTA, 0.5
mL FBS, 1.25 mL of 1 M HEPES, pH 7.0 in 50 mL Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS). The cells were fixed in 2% (v/v) paraformaldehyde
in FACS buffer for 10 min at room temperature, then washed twice more
before analysis on a BD LSR II flow cytometer (10 000 events
per sample). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Confocal Microscopy
HeLa cells were seeded at a density
of 25 000 cells/250 μL MEM/well onto glass coverslips
placed in an untreated 24-well plate. They were allowed to grow for
24 h before the media was replaced with 200 μL of fresh MEM
containing 2 500 000 particles per cell (4.089 μg
TMV or 0.581 μg CPMV). The cells were incubated at 37 °C
in 5% CO2 for 3 h, then washed with DPBS and fixed using
4% (v/v) paraformaldehyde and 0.3% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in DPBS for
5 min. The cells were then permeabilized with 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100
in DPBS for 2 min and blocked with 5% (v/v) goat serum (GS) in DPBS
for 45 min. Endolysosomes were stained using mouse anti-humanLAMP-1
at a 1:200 dilution in 5% GS for an hour. The cells were incubated
with secondary goat anti-mouseAlexa Fluor 488 at a 1:500 dilution
in 5% GS for another hour. After each step, the coverslips were washed
with DPBS 3×. The coverslips were then mounted onto glass slides
using Fluoroshield with DAPI (Sigma) and sealed using nail polish.
Confocal images were obtained using Olympus FluoView FV1000 LSCM.
The results were processed and analyzed using ImageJ 1.44o (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
Stability Studies in Lysosomal Extracts
All animal
studies were carried out using IACUC-approved procedures. Female Balb/c
mice were starved overnight and euthanized using carbon dioxide inhalation.
Livers were removed and stored at −80 °C until ready for
use. Lysosomes were extracted using the Lysosome Isolation Kit (Sigma-Aldrich)
and the presence of lysosomal enzymes was determined using the Acid
Phosphatase Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). Following lysosomal extraction
and characterization, samples was frozen at −80 °C until
ready for use. BSA was used as the internal standard to determine
the enzymatic activity of the extracts, because we found that BSA
is easily degraded in the lysosomal extract (Figure 5). TMVLys-e-A488 samples were incubated in KP buffer
pH 7 or pH 5 or in lysosomal extracts: TMVLys-e-A488 was
added to the extract at a concentration of 1 mg/mL and hydrochloric
acid was used to adjust the pH to 5. Samples were incubated at 37
°C under gentle agitation, and time course studies were conducted.
Aliquots of 15 μL were taken at specific times and characterized
using SDS gel electrophoresis. Gels were analyzed using ImageJ 1.44o
(http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).
Authors: Carissa M Soto; Amy Szuchmacher Blum; Gary J Vora; Nikolai Lebedev; Carolyn E Meador; Angela P Won; Anju Chatterji; John E Johnson; Banahalli R Ratna Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Chris S Rae; Ing Wei Khor; Qian Wang; Giuseppe Destito; Maria J Gonzalez; Pratik Singh; Diane M Thomas; Mayra N Estrada; Elizabeth Powell; M G Finn; Marianne Manchester Journal: Virology Date: 2005-09-26 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Kim E Sapsford; Carissa M Soto; Amy Szuchmacher Blum; Anju Chatterji; Tianwei Lin; John E Johnson; Frances S Ligler; Banahalli R Ratna Journal: Biosens Bioelectron Date: 2005-10-10 Impact factor: 10.618
Authors: John D Lewis; Giuseppe Destito; Andries Zijlstra; Maria J Gonzalez; James P Quigley; Marianne Manchester; Heidi Stuhlmann Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-02-26 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Hema Masarapu; Bindi K Patel; Paul L Chariou; He Hu; Neetu M Gulati; Bradley L Carpenter; Reza A Ghiladi; Sourabh Shukla; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Anna E Czapar; Yao-Rong Zheng; Imogen A Riddell; Sourabh Shukla; Samuel G Awuah; Stephen J Lippard; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Christine E Boone; Chao Wang; Miguel Angel Lopez-Ramirez; Veronique Beiss; Sourabh Shukla; Paul L Chariou; Daniel Kupor; Ricardo Rueda; Joseph Wang; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: ACS Appl Nano Mater Date: 2020-08-07
Authors: Michael A Bruckman; Anna E Czapar; Allen VanMeter; Lauren N Randolph; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: J Control Release Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 9.776