Michael A Bruckman1, Kai Jiang, Emily J Simpson, Lauren N Randolph, Leonard G Luyt, Xin Yu, Nicole F Steinmetz. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, ‡Department of Radiology, §Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and ∥Department of Macromolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University Schools of Medicine and Engineering , 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.
Abstract
The underlying cause of major cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarctions and strokes, is atherosclerosis. For accurate diagnosis of this inflammatory disease, molecular imaging is required. Toward this goal, we sought to develop a nanoparticle-based, high aspect ratio, molecularly targeted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent. Specifically, we engineered the plant viral nanoparticle platform tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) to target vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, which is highly expressed on activated endothelial cells at atherosclerotic plaques. To achieve dual optical and MR imaging in an atherosclerotic ApoE(-/-) mouse model, TMV was modified to carry near-infrared dyes and chelated Gd ions. Our results indicate molecular targeting of atherosclerotic plaques. On the basis of the multivalency and multifunctionality, the targeted TMV-based MR probe increased the detection limit significantly; the injected dose of Gd ions could be further reduced 400x compared to the suggested clinical use, demonstrating the utility of targeted nanoparticle cargo delivery.
The underlying cause of major cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarctions and strokes, is atherosclerosis. For accurate diagnosis of this inflammatory disease, molecular imaging is required. Toward this goal, we sought to develop a nanoparticle-based, high aspect ratio, molecularly targeted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging contrast agent. Specifically, we engineered the plant viral nanoparticle platform tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) to target vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, which is highly expressed on activated endothelial cells at atherosclerotic plaques. To achieve dual optical and MR imaging in an atheroscleroticApoE(-/-) mouse model, TMV was modified to carry near-infrared dyes and chelated Gd ions. Our results indicate molecular targeting of atherosclerotic plaques. On the basis of the multivalency and multifunctionality, the targeted TMV-based MR probe increased the detection limit significantly; the injected dose of Gd ions could be further reduced 400x compared to the suggested clinical use, demonstrating the utility of targeted nanoparticle cargo delivery.
Heart disease is the leading
cause of death in the U.S., and a large portion is attributed to atherosclerosis.[1] Atherosclerosis development can begin during
adolescence and often remains asymptomatic until a clinical event
such as a heart attack or stroke occurs. Early indicators of cardiovascular
disease, such as unnatural levels of lipoproteins (including cholesterol),
glucose, blood pressure, and body weight, are used to assess and prevent
hospitalization and death resulting from a clinical event. However,
all of these measurements are risk factors for atherosclerosis, not
diagnosis of the disease. Current imaging methods to detect atherosclerosis
include X-ray angiography,[2] optical coherence
tomography,[3] and intravascular ultrasound[4] imaging; these are invasive methods that detect
luminal narrowing and intima-media thickening. However, the risk of
a clinical event depends more on the composition of the lesion as
opposed to its size and luminal stenosis.[5] On the contrary, molecular imaging enables more accurate diagnosis
of atherosclerotic plaques via sensitive detection of molecular biomarkers
of vulnerable plaques. It also provides more comprehensive follow-up
and assessment of pharmaceutical interventions.Noninvasive
imaging methods such as optical imaging, single-photon
emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) are currently in development and clinical
testing.[6] Of these modalities, MR imaging
is particularly attractive, because it is noninvasive, uses nonionizing
radiation, while facilitating deep tissue imaging and providing high
soft tissue contrast. While MR imaging provides high spatial resolution,
diagnosis can be difficult in areas where diseased and healthy tissues
are of similar signal intensities. This lack of imaging contrast can
be overcome by using contrast-enhancement agents and nanoparticle
formulations that target highly expressed molecular epitomes in the
diseased tissue.Atherosclerosis is characterized by the accumulation
of lipids
(carrying cholesterol), leukocytes, fibrous elements, and smooth muscle
cells into the intima of arteries. A key process during atherosclerotic
plaque development is the infiltration of leukocytes:[7] activated endothelial cells that express proinflammatory
molecules including E- and P-selectins, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1
(VCAM-1), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1, which support rolling,
adhesion, and migration of leukocytes.[8] In addition, the following molecular and cellular targets are present
in plaque development and have been used to identify and classify
plaque development: fibrin, scavenger receptors, annexin V, and αvβ3 integrin.[9] These
molecular signatures of the inflamed endothelium open the door for
targeted, molecular imaging tools.VCAM-1 is an attractive target
because of its critical role in
atherosclerosis development and its unique expression pattern: VCAM-1
is highly up-regulated on inflamed endothelium.[10] Indeed, several molecular imaging applications of nanoparticle
formulation targeted to VCAM-1 have been demonstrated, such as perfluorocarbons,[11,12] iron oxides,[13,14] polymers,[15] and quantum dots.[16]To
date, the nanoparticle systems tested and developed for molecular
imaging of atherosclerosis are of spherical nature, which may not
be optimal. There is emerging evidence suggesting that nonspherical
materials have superior properties, especially for endothelial targeting;
increased margination toward the vessel wall increases the probability
for the imaging probe to effectively interact with the molecular target.
Furthermore, the elongated materials present the ligands more effectively
to the much larger and flat vessel wall compared to spherical nanoparticles
(with their high degree of curvature).[17−19] Another advantage is
that elongated materials have increased immune evasion and reduced
macrophage uptake, therefore further contributing to synergistic target
enhancement as a combination of molecular recognition and particle
morphology.[20,21]While a few studies have
investigated the application of nonspherical
materials for applications in cancer nanotechnology and medicine,[22,23] the study of elongated materials for applications in cardiovascular
disease remains an understudied area. It remains challenging to precisely
control the synthesis of nanoparticles in two dimensions, and therefore
most materials under development spherical symmetry. We have turned
toward high aspect ratio (defined as length over width) nanomaterials
produced by nature, specifically, the tubular structures forming the
plant virus tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) measuring 300 × 18 nm.
TMV and other plant viral nanoparticles (VNPs) have many beneficial
properties for medical applications. Its structure is known to atomic
resolution and its surface chemistry (inside and out) is well-established;[24] in addition, TMV is amenable to genetic engineering
at its solvent-exposed N- and C-terminus.[25−28] Structure-based engineering allows the introduction of deterministic,
precise, and reproducible modifications. The production of TMV using
molecular farming in plants is highly scalable and economic (and does
not involve toxic solvents or high-temperature processes). We have
shown that TMV can be delivered intravenously and is biocompatible
and biodegradable.[29] Short circulation
times (minutes) and rapid tissue clearance make it an ideal candidate
for applications in molecular imaging. In this study, we report the
application of TMV as a platform for dual molecular optical and MR
imaging of atherosclerotic plaques using the ApoE–/– mouse model.(A) An illustrative image (PyMol and Chimera) of the structure
of tobacco mosaic virus rods and its coat protein. The exterior (red)
and interior (blue) reactive amino acids are highlighted in the individual
coat protein. Bioconjugation of VCAM-1 targeting ligands or PEG and
contrast agents to the surface of TMV involved the following sequence
of reactions: (B) exterior incorporation of alkynes followed by attachment
of VCAM-1 or PEG, followed by (C) internal channel incorporation of
alkynes and contrast agent modification. Chemical structures are shown
in the boxes.TMV was propagated and
isolated from Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Figure 1A shows the high-resolution
crystal structure of TMV highlighting exterior tyrosine residues (TYR139,
red) and interior glutamic acid residues (GLU97/106, blue) that were
functionalized using previously established protocols.[30] TMV was labeled with sulfo-Cy5-azide dyes for
optical imaging, Gd ions chelated with azido-mono amide-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N-N′-N″-N‴-tetra acetic acid (Gd(DOTA)) for MR imaging, PEG,
and oligopeptides (VHPKQHRAEEA-Lys(PEG7-N3)-NH2),[31] specific to VCAM-1 receptor (Figure 1B). Detailed experimental procedures as well as
peptide synthesis and characterization are described in the Supporting Information. In brief, a combination
of carbodiimide coupling targeting interior glutamic acids and diazonium
coupling targeting exterior tyrosine side chains was used to introduce
alkyne ligation handles, followed by introduction of functional molecules
(contrast agents and peptide ligand) using copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne
cycloaddition (CuAAC) chemistry (Figure 1B,C, Supporting Information). The sequence of chemical
reactions was critical to ensure particle stability. First the exterior
surface is modified with alkyne handles followed by modification with
PEG or VCAM-1peptide (Figure 1B); second,
the interior is modified with alkyne handles followed by modification
with optical and MR contrast agents (Figure 1C).
Figure 1
(A) An illustrative image (PyMol and Chimera) of the structure
of tobacco mosaic virus rods and its coat protein. The exterior (red)
and interior (blue) reactive amino acids are highlighted in the individual
coat protein. Bioconjugation of VCAM-1 targeting ligands or PEG and
contrast agents to the surface of TMV involved the following sequence
of reactions: (B) exterior incorporation of alkynes followed by attachment
of VCAM-1 or PEG, followed by (C) internal channel incorporation of
alkynes and contrast agent modification. Chemical structures are shown
in the boxes.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and size exclusion
chromatography
(SEC) analysis indicate that the modified TMV particles remained structurally
sound following multiple rounds of bioconjugation reactions (TEM of
VCAM-TMV and PEG-TMV shown in Figure 2A,B,
respectively). SEC also indicates covalent modification of TMV with
Cy5 dyes as indicated by coelution of the dye-specific peak at 648
nm with the TMV peak at 260 nm (Figure 2C,D).
A combination of denaturing gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), matrix-assisted
laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF
MS), UV–visible spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma
optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) measurements were performed
to determine the degree of labeling (Figure 2). Figure 2E shows the MALDI-TOF MS for VCAM-TMV
coat proteins (CPs) displaying peaks attributed to a mix of (i) alkyne-modified
CPs (17 758 m/z), (ii) contrast
agent (Gd(DOTA) or Cy5)-modified CPs (18 419 m/z), and (iii) VCAM peptide-modified CPs (19 501 m/z). Similarly, Figure 2F shows the MS of PEG-TMV with peaks attributed to a mix of
(i) alkyne-modified CP (17 822 m/z), (ii) CPs with one contrast agent-modified CP (18 542 m/z) or CPs with two contrast agents per
CP (19 159 m/z), and (iii)
PEG-modified CPs (19 938 m/z). While dual modification of the CPs with targeting ligand and contrast
agents was not observed, data indicate collective labeling of the
TMV rod consisting of a mix of CPs labeled with either a Cy5 NIR dye,
Gd(DOTA) MR contrast agent, and the VCAM-1 targeting ligand or PEG.
Detailed mass spectra, theoretical mass of TMV CP products after each
conjugation step, and their peak assignments are provided in the Supporting Information; see Supporting Information Figures S1 and S2 and Tables S1 and
S2. It should be noted that MALDI-TOF MS is not a quantitative method
but can confirm qualitatively covalent modifications.[32]
Figure 2
Bioconjugation of TMV was characterized by TEM, SEC, MALDI-TOF
MS, SDS-PAGE, and UV–vis absorbance. The TEM of (A) VCAM-TMV
and (B) PEG-TMV show that the rod shape of TMV is maintained after
modification (scale bar is 100 nm). The single and aligned peaks from
SEC absorbance at 260 and 647 nm of (C) VCAM-TMV and (D) PEG-TMV indicate
that the particles are pure, monodisperse, and that the Cy5 dyes are
covalently attached to TMV. (E) MALDI-TOF MS of VCAM-TMV displays
peaks associated with either wt-TMV or alkyne-TMV CPs (17 758 m/z), CPs labeled with a single contrast
agent (Gd(DOTA) or Cy5) (18 419 m/z), and CPs labeled with a VCAM peptide (19 501 m/z). Similarly, (F) the MS of PEG-TMV
displays peaks associated with either wt-TMV or alkyne-TMV CPs (17 822 m/z), CPs labeled with a single contrast
agent (18 542 m/z) or two
contrast agents (19 159 m/z), and CPs labeled with a PEG molecule (19 938 m/z). More detailed analysis of MALDI-TOF MS is provided
in the Supporting Information. (G) SDS-PAGE
after Coomassie staining of 1 = unmodified TMV, 2 = VCAM-TMV, 3 =
PEG-TMV. (H) UV–vis absorbance of VCAM-TMV (black line) and
PEG-TMV (gray line).
Quantitative labeling of TMV coat proteins was confirmed
with SDS-PAGE
of the TMV coat proteins with VCAM-1 ligand and PEG (as indicated
by the higher molecular weight bands); band lane analysis using ImageJ
software (Figure 2G) indicates coverage of
TMV with ∼500 VCAM-1 ligands and PEG molecules, respectively,
which corresponds to 25% of the coat proteins being modified (TMV
consists of 2130 identical coat proteins). UV–visible absorbance
was used to determine the degree of Cy5 labeling and ICP-OES was used
to determine the number of Gd(DOTA) molecules per TMV rod. We found
that VCAM-TMV and PEG-TMV were labeled with ∼460 and ∼510
Cy5 dyes, respectively, thus also covering 25% of the available coat
proteins. Finally, VCAM-TMV was loaded with ∼1200 chelated
Gd ions, resulting in a per Gd relaxivity of 14.6 mM–1 s–1 yielding a per TMV relaxivity of 17, 567
mM–1 s–1 at 60 MHz (Figure 2). This is a 3-fold increase in ionic relaxivity
over free Gd(DOTA) (5 mM–1 s–1 at 60 MHz) resulting from the reduced molecular tumbling rate.[33]Bioconjugation of TMV was characterized by TEM, SEC, MALDI-TOF
MS, SDS-PAGE, and UV–vis absorbance. The TEM of (A) VCAM-TMV
and (B) PEG-TMV show that the rod shape of TMV is maintained after
modification (scale bar is 100 nm). The single and aligned peaks from
SEC absorbance at 260 and 647 nm of (C) VCAM-TMV and (D) PEG-TMV indicate
that the particles are pure, monodisperse, and that the Cy5 dyes are
covalently attached to TMV. (E) MALDI-TOF MS of VCAM-TMV displays
peaks associated with either wt-TMV or alkyne-TMV CPs (17 758 m/z), CPs labeled with a single contrast
agent (Gd(DOTA) or Cy5) (18 419 m/z), and CPs labeled with a VCAM peptide (19 501 m/z). Similarly, (F) the MS of PEG-TMV
displays peaks associated with either wt-TMV or alkyne-TMV CPs (17 822 m/z), CPs labeled with a single contrast
agent (18 542 m/z) or two
contrast agents (19 159 m/z), and CPs labeled with a PEG molecule (19 938 m/z). More detailed analysis of MALDI-TOF MS is provided
in the Supporting Information. (G) SDS-PAGE
after Coomassie staining of 1 = unmodified TMV, 2 = VCAM-TMV, 3 =
PEG-TMV. (H) UV–vis absorbance of VCAM-TMV (black line) and
PEG-TMV (gray line).TMV sensors were tested in vivo using the
well-established
ApoE–/– mouse model, fed on a high fat/cholesterol
diet for 14–18 weeks.[34] All procedures
were carried out according to IACUC approved protocols. Mice were
injected with 10 mg/kg VCAM-TMV (n = 4) and PEG-TMV
(n = 3), respectively. Control animals were injected
with PBS and concentration matched nontargeted contrast agent (sulfo-Cy5-azide
in PBS). The injected dose of Cy5 used was 0.20 mg/kg (2.5 ×
10–4 mmol/kg); matched to the concentration of Cy5
injected in 10 mg/kg VCAM-TMV. Finally, VCAM-TMV was injected into
age-matched healthy mice C57BL/6 to demonstrate that VCAM-TMV particles
did not accumulate at healthy endothelial cells. TMV-based imaging
sensors and respective controls were administered intravenously into
the tail vein and the samples were allowed to circulate for up to
3 h prior to dissection and ex vivo fluorescence
analysis of the aortas using Maestro imaging system (Figure 3). Fluorescence imaging indicates selective targeting
and accumulation of VCAM-TMV in the diseased aortas; quantitative
image analysis using Maestro imaging software indicates 3-fold increased
accumulation of VCAM-TMV versus PEG-TMV and therefore demonstrates
molecular targeting (see also discussion below).
Figure 3
(A) Ex vivo fluorescence of aortas from ApoE–/– mice
injected with (from left to right) VCAM-TMV,
PEG-TMV, PBS. (B) Quantitative image analysis (bar graph) showing
average fluorescence intensity per sample.
(A) Ex vivo fluorescence of aortas from ApoE–/– mice
injected with (from left to right) VCAM-TMV,
PEG-TMV, PBS. (B) Quantitative image analysis (bar graph) showing
average fluorescence intensity per sample.Localization of targeted VCAM-TMV in atherosclerotic plaques
was
further confirmed by immunofluorescence imaging of cryosectioned aortas.
Sections of aortas were stained for macrophages (CD68 antibody) to
confirm the presence of plaques (detailed procedures are listed in
the Supporting Information). Representative
images of sectioned and stained aortas from mice injected with VCAM-TMV
and PEG-TMV, and PBS are shown in Figure 4.
In addition, we imaged sectioned aortas from ApoE–/– mice injected with free sulfo-Cy5 dye as well as aortas from healthy
C57Bl/6 mice injected with VCAM-TMV; analysis of these aortas indicated
no fluorescent signal (sectioned images not shown).
Figure 4
Representative
confocal images of cryosectioned aortas from ApoE–/– mice injected with (A) PEG-TMV, and (B) VCAM-TMV
(imaging was performed based on the sulfo-Cy5 label, particles are
pseudocolored in green. Macrophages (CD68 stain) are shown in red
and nuclei (stained with DAPI) are shown in blue. Scale bar = 250
μm. The inset represents a magnified view of the plaque intima
(see arrow). (C) The aorta from each mouse was cut into 10–12
sections 2–4 mm long and then analyzed for plaque content.
Results are plotted as a bar graph quantifying the number of sections
without plaque (blue), sections containing plaque but no signal from
TMV (red), and sections containing plaque with signal from TMV (green).
(D) This data is summarized as percentage of aorta sections with plaque
and TMV signal. Seventy percent of the aorta sections from ApoE–/– mice injected with VCAM-TMV contained TMV
fluorescence, whereas only 18% for PEG-TMV.
We qualitatively
analyzed aortas from each mouse for plaque coverage
and TMV accumulation. Aortas were cut into 10–12 sections 2–4
mm long sections and embedded into OCT medium. The sections were then
categorized as being positive or negative for plaque based on morphology
and positive macrophage staining. Then, sections were further categorized
as positive or negative for fluorescence (Cy5) signal. While VCAM-TMV
accumulation was confirmed in 70% of plaque sections, only 18% of
plaque sections were positive for PEG-TMV signal, indicating VCAM-specific
targeting of the VCAM-TMV formulation. VCAM-TMV and PEG-TMV was not
detected in healthy aorta sections and any other negative controls.
Overall, our data support molecular targeting of VCAM-TMV to inflamed
endothelium.Imaging indicated that VCAM-TMV was localized at
the intima-media
surface of the plaque, the location of activated endothelial cells
expressing VCAM-1 receptors.[10] There was
no indication that VCAM-TMV particles were taken up by macrophages
and incorporated into plaques. The distribution of PEG-TMV and VCAM-TMV
within the plaque tissue was similar, however, a significantly higher
uptake was observed using the targeted VCAM-TMV formulation.Representative
confocal images of cryosectioned aortas from ApoE–/– mice injected with (A) PEG-TMV, and (B) VCAM-TMV
(imaging was performed based on the sulfo-Cy5 label, particles are
pseudocolored in green. Macrophages (CD68 stain) are shown in red
and nuclei (stained with DAPI) are shown in blue. Scale bar = 250
μm. The inset represents a magnified view of the plaque intima
(see arrow). (C) The aorta from each mouse was cut into 10–12
sections 2–4 mm long and then analyzed for plaque content.
Results are plotted as a bar graph quantifying the number of sections
without plaque (blue), sections containing plaque but no signal from
TMV (red), and sections containing plaque with signal from TMV (green).
(D) This data is summarized as percentage of aorta sections with plaque
and TMV signal. Seventy percent of the aorta sections from ApoE–/– mice injected with VCAM-TMV contained TMV
fluorescence, whereas only 18% for PEG-TMV.MR imaging of ApoE–/– mice was conducted
on a Bruker BioSpin 7.0T 70/30USR MRI system. Gd(DOTA)-labeled VCAM-TMV
was injected via a tail vein catheter. Several negative controls were
used such as free Gd(DOTA) and PBS injected into ApoE–/– mice as well as VCAM-TMV injected into healthy C57Bl/6 mice. The
injected dose of Gd was 0.20 mg/kg (2.5 × 10–4 mmol/kg), which is 400 times lower than typical MRI contrast agent
of 0.1 mmol/kg for Gadovist, which is the closest chemically related
clinical contrast agent to Gd(DOTA). The Gd concentration was chosen
based on the amount of Gd injected with 10 mg/kg VCAM-TMV. Following
multiple scouting scans, T1-weighted images were acquired
at baseline and at 30, 60, and 90 min postinjection. A total of 8-axial
slices were acquired with 1 mm slice thickness and 1.5 mm slice separation.
Image acquisition used a fat-suppressed, respiration and ECG-triggered,
multislice multiecho (MSME) black-blood sequence optimized to delineate
the aortic wall with the following parameters: TR/TE = 600/8.0 ms,
two averages, matrix size = 256 × 256, and field of view = 2.98
× 2.98 cm2. Scan time including triggering was 15–20
min. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) was calculated by dividing the average
intensity of the aortic vessel wall by the standard deviation of an
area outside the mouse body.A mouse injected with VCAM-TMV
saw an increase in SNR from 12.6
(preinjection) to 14.7 (20 min), 21.5 (60 min), and 28.7 (95 min)
(Figure 5A). The increase in SNR increased
over time and peaked around 90 min. Not all slices indicated increase
in SNR. This is consistent with histological analysis of collected
aortas that indicated that about 50% of the aortas contained plaques,
and that 70% of those plaques contained TMV. The SNR for free Gd(DOTA)
(0.2 mg/kg) and PBS injected into ApoE–/– mice and VCAM-TMV injected (10 mg/kg) into a healthy C57Bl/6 mouse
remained between 10 and 15 (Figure 5B–D,
respectively). In summary, our data support that VCAM-TMV delivers
large payloads of Gd(DOTA) enabling sensitive detection and imaging
of atherosclerotic plaques in mice. Non-specific accumulation of non-targeted
TMV sensors of false positive signals in healthy mice aortas was not
observed.
Figure 5
Pre- and postinjection MRI scans of (A) VCAM-TMV, (B) Gd(DOTA),
and (C) PBS in ApoE–/– mice, and (D) VCAM-TMV
in a C57Bl/6 mouse. The third column is the subtracted image (90 min
postinjection minus preinjection). The fourth column is the signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) for the vessel wall of the aortas. Insets are magnified
images of the abdominal aorta regions of interest.
Pre- and postinjection MRI scans of (A) VCAM-TMV, (B) Gd(DOTA),
and (C) PBS in ApoE–/– mice, and (D) VCAM-TMV
in a C57Bl/6 mouse. The third column is the subtracted image (90 min
postinjection minus preinjection). The fourth column is the signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) for the vessel wall of the aortas. Insets are magnified
images of the abdominal aorta regions of interest.For the first time, we report the application of
a plant virus-based
T1 contrast agent for medical MR imaging. TMV-based nanorods
were loaded with contrast agents and fluorophores for dual MR and
optical imaging; further, TMV was modified with peptides targeting
VCAM-1 receptors, which are highly expressed in developing atherosclerotic
plaques. A combination of ex vivo optical imaging
and immunofluorescence microscopy supports molecular targeting and
imaging of VCAM-1 signatures in a mouse model of atherosclerosis.
Nontargeted PEG-TMV (negative control) formulations showed negligible
passive accumulation in the diseased aortas. Immunofluorescence imaging
was consistent with VCAM-TMV accumulation at the intima-media interface
of the plaque, which is in agreement with the expression pattern of
VCAM-1 receptors.[10]The development
of in vivo diagnostics and screening
methods for detection of atherosclerotic plaques at risk of rupturing
is an important goal in medicine and holds the potential to reduce
the numbers of heart attacks and strokes. Clinical approaches utilize
coronary angiography,[2] optical coherence
tomography,[3] and intravascular ultrasound.[4] Drawbacks are that these methods involve invasive
procedures and rely on stenosis (lumen narrowing and vessel wall thickening);
however, data indicate that stenosis correlates poorly with the risk
of plaque rupture. It has been recognized that the accurate diagnosis
of plaques vulnerable to rupturing requires noninvasive identification
of specific molecular markers, which is currently an unmet clinical
need.[35]In recent years, significant
advances have been made toward translating
the biology of atherosclerosis to highlight markers for molecular
targeting.[8] For example, the general characteristics
of vulnerable plaques include high macrophage content, thin fibrin
cap, and intimal remodeling. The expression pattern of VCAM-1 receptors
on endothelial cells is relatively well understood: its function is
to recruit leukocytes to the arterial intima; therefore VCAM-1 expression
is a strong indicator of continued plaque development. Indeed, several
groups demonstrated molecular imaging of VCAM-1 receptors using either
small peptides or antibodies appended to perfluorocarbons,[11,12] as free peptides/antibody,[12,36] and metallic nanoparticles.[37] Other approaches include targeting molecular
signatures such as fibrin,[38,39] elastin,[40] vimentin,[41] and apoptotic
cells.[42] Synthetic and nature’s
nanoparticles have been developed as targeted devices for imaging
of the inflamed endothelium. For example, others have shown targeting
of 30 nm sized icosahedron cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) to atherosclerotic
plaques,[41,43] based on its naturally occurring interactions
with surface-expressed vimentin receptors present on macrophages and
foam cells. In a different approach, a small heat shock protein genetically
encoded with the oligopeptide LyP-1 was used to target atherosclerosis-associated
macrophages.[44] However, in vivo imaging modalities, such as MRI, have not been demonstrated using
CPMV or other protein-based nanoparticles.Nanoparticle-based
T1 contrast agents loaded with high
payloads of chelated Gd have been developed and studied for MR imaging.
The advantages of using nanocarriers is the increased SNR resulting
from combined contribution of large payload delivery, molecular targeting,
and reduced tumbling rates. Nevertheless, the concern is that nanoparticles
loaded with gadolinium ions may lead to increased toxicity due to
enhanced tissue retention and potential release of free Gd ions.[45] Free Gd ions are susceptible to transmetallization
causing inflammatory responses in nearly all tissues.[46,47] Chelating Gd ions to molecules such as DOTA significantly reduces
this effect but not completely. Injecting chelated Gd into patients
with kidney disease has led to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis due to
the kidneys inability to clear the paramagnetic contrast agent quickly.[48,49] Using TMV-based contrast agents may offer a possible solution to
this translational hurdle: TMV-based contrast agents have a short
circulation time with a plasma half-life on the order of minutes.
The combination of rapid blood pool clearance and rapid accumulation
at the target side (maximum SNR was reached in MRI 90 min post VCAM-TMV
administration) provides a suitable time frame for imaging applications;
for example, it would be ideal to inject the patient on the way to
the MRI (rather than hours prior to imaging). In a recent study documenting
the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, and blood compatibility, we
demonstrated that TMV shows good biocompatibility and is cleared from
tissues within hours to days post administration with no apparent
pathological side effects.[29]Most
importantly, we would like to stress that the TMV-based contrast
agent allowed molecular MR imaging at an injected dose 400 times lower
than the clinical dose of chelated Gd molecules used in exams such
as magnetic resonance angiography; we report imaging of atherosclerotic
plaques at a dose of 0.00025 mmol/kg Gd ions versus 0.1 mmol/kg Gd
ions (typical clinical dose). For comparison, recently published paramagnetic
nanoparticle platforms generally use injected doses of 0.01 to 0.05
mmol/kg Gd.[39,42,50,51] The significant increase in sensitivity
can be explained by the large payload of Gd ions delivered per particle
in combination with molecular targeting and reduced tumbling rates
(effect of shape) increasing the relaxivity per ion. To the best of
our knowledge, this is the lowest injection dose of chelated Gd yielding
adequate positive signal enhancement in a preclinical atheroscleroticmouse model.Here, we hypothesize that the elongated shape of
TMV contributes
synergistically to the molecular targeting strategy. Recent reports
indicate that elongated, rod-shaped nanoparticles have improved margination
properties and therefore enhanced vessel wall targeting compared to
spherical particles; furthermore, increased circulation and decreased
phagocytosis, as well as increased surface area along with higher
density of targeting ligands, are factors that contribute to favorable in vivo properties based on shape effects.[52]While molecular imaging holds the potential to enable
screening
and early detection of atherosclerotic plaques, molecular targeting
strategies could be combined with therapeutic approaches (leading
toward the development of theranostics). Expression of VCAM-1 receptors
on endothelial cells is present throughout all stages of the plaque
development.[9] VCAM-1 expression decreases
in patients upon treatment with statins or angiotensin antagonists,
further supporting its critical role in atherosclerotic development.[53,54] Interestingly, blocking VCAM-1 receptors has a demonstrated therapeutic
effect by interfering with the inflammatory signaling cascade that
results from lipid accumulation.[55] Also,
the lack of leukocyte recruitment (inherent with reduced VCAM-1 expression)
is expected to lead to reduced macrophage and foam cell presence,
therefore reducing the risk of plaque rupture.In summary, our
data support the successful development of a molecularly
targeted TMV-based probe for dual MR and optical imaging of atherosclerotic
plaques in mice. We demonstrated that large payloads of cargo (here
contrast agents) were delivered to atherosclerotic plaques by targeting
molecular cell receptors present on activated endothelial cells. While
this study focuses on the application of TMV-based sensors for MR
detection and imaging of atherosclerotic plaques, the developed imaging
probes could also find application for MR imaging of other diseases.
Furthermore, the contrast agents could be exchanged with therapeutic
agents and/or therapeutic moieties could further be added to the multifunctional
scaffold. It is clear that the molecular structure of TMV offers a
high degree of engineerability (TMV particles remained stable after
multiple rounds of bioconjugation). The potential applications of
the TMV-based plug’n play technology are wide-ranging and future
studies will include imaging of combinations of molecular targets
as well as drug delivery.
Authors: Matthias Nahrendorf; Farouc A Jaffer; Kimberly A Kelly; David E Sosnovik; Elena Aikawa; Peter Libby; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-09-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carmen Burtea; Sébastien Ballet; Sophie Laurent; Olivier Rousseaux; Anne Dencausse; Walter Gonzalez; Marc Port; Claire Corot; Luce Vander Elst; Robert N Muller Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Bryan Ronain Smith; Paul Kempen; Donna Bouley; Alexander Xu; Zhuang Liu; Nicholas Melosh; Hongjie Dai; Robert Sinclair; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Hua Pan; Jacob W Myerson; Lingzhi Hu; Jon N Marsh; Kirk Hou; Michael J Scott; John S Allen; Grace Hu; Susana San Roman; Gregory M Lanza; Robert D Schreiber; Paul H Schlesinger; Samuel A Wickline Journal: FASEB J Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Leonie Rouleau; Romain Berti; Vanessa W K Ng; Carl Matteau-Pelletier; Tina Lam; Pierre Saboural; Ashok K Kakkar; Frédéric Lesage; Eric Rhéaume; Jean-Claude Tardif Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Carmen Burtea; Sophie Laurent; Marc Port; Eric Lancelot; Sébastien Ballet; Olivier Rousseaux; Gérard Toubeau; Luce Vander Elst; Claire Corot; Robert N Muller Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Duc H T Le; Eduardo Méndez-López; Chao Wang; Ulrich Commandeur; Miguel A Aranda; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2018-12-18 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Herdis Bludau; Anna E Czapar; Andrzej S Pitek; Sourabh Shukla; Rainer Jordan; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Eur Polym J Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 4.598
Authors: Khosrow Khodabandehlou; Jacqueline J Masehi-Lano; Christopher Poon; Jonathan Wang; Eun Ji Chung Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: Sourabh Shukla; Fabian J Eber; Adithy S Nagarajan; Nicholas A DiFranco; Nora Schmidt; Amy M Wen; Sabine Eiben; Richard M Twyman; Christina Wege; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 9.933
Authors: Andrzej S Pitek; Slater A Jameson; Frank A Veliz; Sourabh Shukla; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Michael A Bruckman; Lauren N Randolph; Neetu M Gulati; Phoebe L Stewart; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 6.331