PURPOSE: Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is characterized by severe gallbladder inflammation without cystic duct obstruction. Critical illness and neurological deficits are often associated with AAC, and early radiologic imaging is necessary for the detection and timely treatment of AAC. In critically ill patients, effective surgical management is difficult. This review examines the three common surgical treatments for AAC (open cholecystectomy (OC), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), or percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)), their prevalence in current literature, and the perioperative outcomes of these different approaches using a large retrospective database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review examined literature gathered from PubMed and Google Scholar to select more than 50 sources with data pertinent to AAC; of which 20 are described in a summary table. Outcomes from our previous research and several updated results were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database. RESULTS: LC has proven effective in treating AAC when the risks of general anesthesia and the chance for conversion to OC are low. In critically ill patients with multiple comorbidities, PC or OC may be the only available options. Data in the literature and an examination of outcomes within a national database indicate that for severely ill patients, PC may be safer and met with better outcomes than OC for the healthier set of AAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a three-pronged approach to surgical resolution of AAC. Patients that are healthy enough to tolerate LC should undergo LC early in the course of the disease. In critically ill patients, patients with multiple comorbidities, a high conversion risk, or who are poor surgical candidates, PC may be the safest and most successful intervention.
PURPOSE: Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is characterized by severe gallbladder inflammation without cystic duct obstruction. Critical illness and neurological deficits are often associated with AAC, and early radiologic imaging is necessary for the detection and timely treatment of AAC. In critically illpatients, effective surgical management is difficult. This review examines the three common surgical treatments for AAC (open cholecystectomy (OC), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), or percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC)), their prevalence in current literature, and the perioperative outcomes of these different approaches using a large retrospective database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review examined literature gathered from PubMed and Google Scholar to select more than 50 sources with data pertinent to AAC; of which 20 are described in a summary table. Outcomes from our previous research and several updated results were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) database. RESULTS: LC has proven effective in treating AAC when the risks of general anesthesia and the chance for conversion to OC are low. In critically illpatients with multiple comorbidities, PC or OC may be the only available options. Data in the literature and an examination of outcomes within a national database indicate that for severely ill patients, PC may be safer and met with better outcomes than OC for the healthier set of AAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a three-pronged approach to surgical resolution of AAC. Patients that are healthy enough to tolerate LC should undergo LC early in the course of the disease. In critically illpatients, patients with multiple comorbidities, a high conversion risk, or who are poor surgical candidates, PC may be the safest and most successful intervention.
Authors: Byung Hyo Cha; Ha Hun Song; Young Nam Kim; Won Jung Jeon; Sang Jin Lee; Jin Dong Kim; Hak Hyun Lee; Ban Seok Lee; Sang Hyub Lee Journal: Korean J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-01-25
Authors: Orhan Alimoglu; Orhan V Ozkan; Mustafa Sahin; Adem Akcakaya; Ramazan Eryilmaz; Gurhan Bas Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-02-27 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: E Atar; G N Bachar; S Berlin; C Neiman; E Bleich-Belenky; S Litvin; M Knihznik; A Belenky; E Ram Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Ana María González-Castillo; Juan Sancho-Insenser; Maite De Miguel-Palacio; Josep-Ricard Morera-Casaponsa; Estela Membrilla-Fernández; María-José Pons-Fragero; Miguel Pera-Román; Luis Grande-Posa Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Alain Chichom-Mefire; Francesco M Labricciosa; Timothy Hardcastle; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Abdulrashid K Adesunkanmi; Luca Ansaloni; Miklosh Bala; Zsolt J Balogh; Marcelo A Beltrán; Offir Ben-Ishay; Walter L Biffl; Arianna Birindelli; Miguel A Cainzos; Gianbattista Catalini; Marco Ceresoli; Asri Che Jusoh; Osvaldo Chiara; Federico Coccolini; Raul Coimbra; Francesco Cortese; Zaza Demetrashvili; Salomone Di Saverio; Jose J Diaz; Valery N Egiev; Paula Ferrada; Gustavo P Fraga; Wagih M Ghnnam; Jae Gil Lee; Carlos A Gomes; Andreas Hecker; Torsten Herzog; Jae Il Kim; Kenji Inaba; Arda Isik; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Jeffry Kashuk; Vladimir Khokha; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Kaoru Koike; Victor Y Kong; Ari Leppaniemi; Gustavo M Machain; Ronald V Maier; Sanjay Marwah; Michael E McFarlane; Giulia Montori; Ernest E Moore; Ionut Negoi; Iyiade Olaoye; Abdelkarim H Omari; Carlos A Ordonez; Bruno M Pereira; Gerson A Pereira Júnior; Guntars Pupelis; Tarcisio Reis; Boris Sakakhushev; Norio Sato; Helmut A Segovia Lohse; Vishal G Shelat; Kjetil Søreide; Waldemar Uhl; Jan Ulrych; Harry Van Goor; George C Velmahos; Kuo-Ching Yuan; Imtiaz Wani; Dieter G Weber; Sanoop K Zachariah; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2017-07-10 Impact factor: 5.469