Literature DB >> 24463286

Percutaneous cholecystostomy is appropriate as definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis in critically ill patients: a single center, cross-sectional study.

Byung Hyo Cha1, Ha Hun Song, Young Nam Kim, Won Jung Jeon, Sang Jin Lee, Jin Dong Kim, Hak Hyun Lee, Ban Seok Lee, Sang Hyub Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an effective treatment for cholecystitis in high-risk surgical patients. However, there is no definitive agreement on the need for additional cholecystectomy in these patients.
METHODS: All patients who were admitted to Cheju Halla General Hospital (Jeju, Korea) for acute cholecystitis and who underwent ultrasonography-guided PC between 2007 and 2012 were consecutively enrolled in this study. Among 82 total patients enrolled, 35 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy after recovery and 47 received the best supportive care (BSC) without additional surgery.
RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates for PC were 100% and 97.5%, respectively. The overall mean survival was 12.8 months. In the BSC group, mean survival was 5.4 months, and in the cholecystectomy group, mean survival was 22.4 months (p<0.01). However, there was no significant difference between these groups in multivariate analysis (relative risk [RR]=1.92; 95% CI, 0.77-4.77; p=0.16). However, advanced age (RR=1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08; p=0.001) and higher class in the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status (RR=3.06; 95% CI, 1.37-6.83, p=0.006) were significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. Among the 47 patients in the BSC group, the cholecystostomy tube was removed in 31 patients per protocol. Recurrent cholecystitis was not observed in either group of patients during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk surgical patients, PC without additional cholecystectomy might be the best definitive management. Furthermore, the cholecystostomy drainage catheter can be safely removed in certain patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24463286     DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2014.63.1.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1598-9992


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Francesca M Dimou; Deepak Adhikari; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Acute acalculous cholecystitis in the critically ill: risk factors and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Charles Treinen; Daniel Lomelin; Crystal Krause; Matthew Goede; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy… why, when, what next? A systematic review of past decade.

Authors:  M Elsharif; A Forouzanfar; K Oaikhinan; Niraj Khetan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Outcomes of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Khang Wen Pang; Chun Han Nigel Tan; Stanley Loh; Kin Yong Stephen Chang; Shridhar Ganpathi Iyer; Krishnakumar Madhavan; Wei Chieh Alfred Kow
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Management of Patients With Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy: From the Acute Stage to Definitive Surgical Treatment.

Authors:  Yu-Liang Hung; Chang-Mu Sung; Chih-Yuan Fu; Chien-Hung Liao; Shang-Yu Wang; Jun-Te Hsu; Ta-Sen Yeh; Chun-Nan Yeh; Yi-Yin Jan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-04-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.