Literature DB >> 12607047

Timing of cholecystectomy for acute biliary pancreatitis: outcomes of cholecystectomy on first admission and after recurrent biliary pancreatitis.

Orhan Alimoglu1, Orhan V Ozkan, Mustafa Sahin, Adem Akcakaya, Ramazan Eryilmaz, Gurhan Bas.   

Abstract

Biliary stones are the leading cause of acute pancreatitis. Although cholecystectomy and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) comprise the current treatment in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP), the time of intervention is still controversial. In this study we evaluated the outcomes of cholecystectomy on first admission for ABP and in patients with recurrent biliary pancreatitis. A series of 43 patients with ABP between January 1997 and November 2000 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were classified into two groups. Group I included 27 patients who underwent cholecystectomy on first admission before discharge from the hospital. Group II comprised 16 patients who had recurrent biliary pancreatitis and then underwent cholecystectomy. The severity of the pancreatitis was determined by Ranson's criteria. Age, gender, length of hospital stay, severity of pancreatitis, amylase level, and complications of cholecystectomy were evaluated in both groups. Patients in group I underwent cholecystectomy during the original hospital admission and patients in group II during an admission for a recurrence. There were 24 patients with a Ranson's score </= 3 in group I and 12 in group II. The mean hospital stays were 15.29 days (range 4-48 days) and 36.66 days (range 15-123 days) in groups I and II, respectively ( p = 0.006). Morbidity was 11% without mortality in group I and 43% with one mortality in group II ( p = 0.023). Definitive treatment of ABP can be accomplished effectively and safely by cholecystectomy following clinical improvement, with selective ERC performed during the first admission (delayed cholecystectomy). Waiting to perform cholecystectomy (interval cholecystectomy) may result in recurrent biliary pancreatitis, which may increase morbidity and the length of the hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12607047     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-002-6647-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  23 in total

1.  Conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: does the time interval matter?

Authors:  A de Vries; S C Donkervoort; A A W van Geloven; E G J M Pierik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Timing of cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis: do the data support current guidelines?

Authors:  Kaori Ito; Hiromichi Ito; Edward E Whang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Timing of cholecystectomy in biliary pancreatitis treatment.

Authors:  Uygar Demir; Pınar Yazıcı; Özgür Bostancı; Cemal Kaya; Hakan Köksal; Gürhan Işıl; Emre Bozdağ; Mehmet Mihmanlı
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  The impact of empiric endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy on future gallstone-related complications in patients with non-severe acute biliary pancreatitis whose cholecystectomy was deferred or not performed.

Authors:  Wiriyaporn Ridtitid; Santi Kulpatcharapong; Panida Piyachaturawat; Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon; Pradermchai Kongkam; Rungsun Rerknimitr
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The impact of intraoperative cholangiography on recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Mark J Walsh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Alanine transaminase rather than abdominal ultrasound alone is an important investigation to justify cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Kerry Anderson; Lisa A Brown; Philip Daniel; Saxon J Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Recurrent acute pancreatitis and its relative factors.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Hong-Chao Shan; Yan Gu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy following endoscopic sphincterotomy for mild biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Brett D Mador; O Neely M Panton; S Morad Hameed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The Value of Performing Early Non-enhanced CT in Developing Strategies for Treating Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Neng-ping Li; Bing-cang Huang; Ya-yun Zhang; Jin Li; Jiang-nan Dong; Tao-ying Qi; Jing Xu; Rong-long Xia; Jiang-Qi Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy and interval cholecystectomy are reasonable alternatives to index cholecystectomy in severe acute gallstone pancreatitis (GSP).

Authors:  Pandanaboyana Sanjay; Sim Yeeting; Carole Whigham; Hannah Judson; Francesco M Polignano; Iain S Tait
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.