Dimitrios Fanourakis1, Habtamu Giday2, Rubén Milla2, Roland Pieruschka2, Katrine H Kjaer2, Marie Bolger3, Aleksandar Vasilevski2, Adriano Nunes-Nesi2, Fabio Fiorani2, Carl-Otto Ottosen2. 1. IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Institute for Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany, Aarhus University, Department of Food Science, Kirstinebjergvej 10, DK-5792 Årslev, Denmark, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles 28933, Spain, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany and Max Planck Partner Group at the Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil dimitrios.fanourakis82@gmail.com. 2. IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Institute for Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany, Aarhus University, Department of Food Science, Kirstinebjergvej 10, DK-5792 Årslev, Denmark, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles 28933, Spain, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany and Max Planck Partner Group at the Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil. 3. IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Institute for Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany, Aarhus University, Department of Food Science, Kirstinebjergvej 10, DK-5792 Årslev, Denmark, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles 28933, Spain, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany and Max Planck Partner Group at the Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Institute for Bio- and Geosciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany, Aarhus University, Department of Food Science, Kirstinebjergvej 10, DK-5792 Årslev, Denmark, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, Móstoles 28933, Spain, Institute for Biology I, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany and Max Planck Partner Group at the Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaf gas exchange is influenced by stomatal size, density, distribution between the leaf adaxial and abaxial sides, as well as by pore dimensions. This study aims to quantify which of these traits mainly underlie genetic differences in operating stomatal conductance (gs) and addresses possible links between anatomical traits and regulation of pore width. METHODS: Stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, gs-related anatomical traits of each leaf side and estimated gs (based on these traits) were determined for 54 introgression lines (ILs) generated by introgressing segments of Solanum pennelli into the S. lycopersicum 'M82'. A quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for stomatal traits was also performed. KEY RESULTS: A wide genetic variation in stomatal responsiveness to desiccation was observed, a large part of which was explained by stomatal length. Operating gs ranged over a factor of five between ILs. The pore area per stomatal area varied 8-fold among ILs (2-16 %), and was the main determinant of differences in operating gs between ILs. Operating gs was primarily positioned on the abaxial surface (60-83 %), due to higher abaxial stomatal density and, secondarily, to larger abaxial pore area. An analysis revealed 64 QTLs for stomatal traits in the ILs, most of which were in the direction of S. pennellii. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that operating and maximum gs of non-stressed leaves maintained under stable conditions deviate considerably (by 45-91 %), because stomatal size inadequately reflects operating pore area (R(2) = 0·46). Furthermore, it was found that variation between ILs in both stomatal sensitivity to desiccation and operating gs is associated with features of individual stoma. In contrast, genotypic variation in gs partitioning depends on the distribution of stomata between the leaf adaxial and abaxial epidermis.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leaf gas exchange is influenced by stomatal size, density, distribution between the leaf adaxial and abaxial sides, as well as by pore dimensions. This study aims to quantify which of these traits mainly underlie genetic differences in operating stomatal conductance (gs) and addresses possible links between anatomical traits and regulation of pore width. METHODS:Stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, gs-related anatomical traits of each leaf side and estimated gs (based on these traits) were determined for 54 introgression lines (ILs) generated by introgressing segments of Solanum pennelli into the S. lycopersicum 'M82'. A quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis for stomatal traits was also performed. KEY RESULTS: A wide genetic variation in stomatal responsiveness to desiccation was observed, a large part of which was explained by stomatal length. Operating gs ranged over a factor of five between ILs. The pore area per stomatal area varied 8-fold among ILs (2-16 %), and was the main determinant of differences in operating gs between ILs. Operating gs was primarily positioned on the abaxial surface (60-83 %), due to higher abaxial stomatal density and, secondarily, to larger abaxial pore area. An analysis revealed 64 QTLs for stomatal traits in the ILs, most of which were in the direction of S. pennellii. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that operating and maximum gs of non-stressed leaves maintained under stable conditions deviate considerably (by 45-91 %), because stomatal size inadequately reflects operating pore area (R(2) = 0·46). Furthermore, it was found that variation between ILs in both stomatal sensitivity to desiccation and operating gs is associated with features of individual stoma. In contrast, genotypic variation in gs partitioning depends on the distribution of stomata between the leaf adaxial and abaxial epidermis.
Authors: Daniel H Chitwood; Ravi Kumar; Lauren R Headland; Aashish Ranjan; Michael F Covington; Yasunori Ichihashi; Daniel Fulop; José M Jiménez-Gómez; Jie Peng; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Dália R A Carvalho; Sissel Torre; Dimitrios Kraniotis; Domingos P F Almeida; Ep Heuvelink; Susana M P Carvalho Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Jaciara Lana-Costa; Franklin Magnum de Oliveira Silva; Willian Batista-Silva; Diego Costa Carolino; Renato Lima Senra; David B Medeiros; Samuel Cordeiro Vitor Martins; Jorge Gago; Wagner L Araújo; Adriano Nunes-Nesi Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Saleh Alseekh; Franklin Magnum de Oliveira Silva; Nooshin Omranian; Gabriel Lichtenstein; Mohammad Mirnezhad; Roman R Romero González; Julia Sabio Y Garcia; Mariana Conte; Kirsten A Leiss; Peter G L Klinkhamer; Zoran Nikoloski; Fernando Carrari; Alisdair R Fernie Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 4.290