Literature DB >> 24279358

Morphological and anatomical determinants of mesophyll conductance in wild relatives of tomato (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon, sect. Lycopersicoides; Solanaceae).

Christopher D Muir1, Roger P Hangarter, Leonie C Moyle, Phillip A Davis.   

Abstract

Natural selection on photosynthetic performance is a primary factor determining leaf phenotypes. The complex CO2 diffusion path from substomatal cavities to the chloroplasts - the mesophyll conductance (g(m)) - limits photosynthetic rate in many species and hence shapes variation in leaf morphology and anatomy. Among sclerophyllous and succulent taxa, structural investment in leaves, measured as the leaf dry mass per area (LMA), has been implicated in decreased gm . However, in herbaceous taxa with high g(m), it is less certain how LMA impacts CO2 diffusion and whether it significantly affects photosynthetic performance. We addressed these questions in the context of understanding the ecophysiological significance of leaf trait variation in wild tomatoes, a closely related group of herbaceous perennials. Although g(m) was high in wild tomatoes, variation in g(m) significantly affected photosynthesis. Even in these tender-leaved herbaceous species, greater LMA led to reduced g(m). This relationship between g(m) and LMA is partially mediated by cell packing and leaf thickness, although amphistomy (equal distribution of stomata on both sides of the leaf) mitigates the effect of leaf thickness. Understanding the costs of increased LMA will inform future work on the adaptive significance of leaf trait variation across ecological gradients in wild tomatoes and other systems.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LMA; adaptation; photosynthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24279358     DOI: 10.1111/pce.12245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  14 in total

1.  Quantitative genetic analysis indicates natural selection on leaf phenotypes across wild tomato species (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae).

Authors:  Christopher D Muir; James B Pease; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Variable Mesophyll Conductance among Soybean Cultivars Sets a Tradeoff between Photosynthesis and Water-Use-Efficiency.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tomeo; David M Rosenthal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Anatomical and diffusional determinants inside leaves explain the difference in photosynthetic capacity between Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum, Orchidaceae.

Authors:  Zhong-Hui Yang; Wei Huang; Qiu-Yun Yang; Wei Chang; Shi-Bao Zhang
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Pore size regulates operating stomatal conductance, while stomatal densities drive the partitioning of conductance between leaf sides.

Authors:  Dimitrios Fanourakis; Habtamu Giday; Rubén Milla; Roland Pieruschka; Katrine H Kjaer; Marie Bolger; Aleksandar Vasilevski; Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Fabio Fiorani; Carl-Otto Ottosen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The acquisitive-conservative axis of leaf trait variation emerges even in homogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lucas D Gorné; Sandra Díaz; Vanessa Minden; Yusuke Onoda; Koen Kramer; Christopher Muir; Sean T Michaletz; Sandra Lavorel; Joanne Sharpe; Steven Jansen; Martijn Slot; Eduardo Chacon; Gerhard Boenisch
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.040

6.  Genotypically Identifying Wheat Mesophyll Conductance Regulation under Progressive Drought Stress.

Authors:  Katarina Olsovska; Marek Kovar; Marian Brestic; Marek Zivcak; Pavol Slamka; Hong Bo Shao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Differences on photosynthetic limitations between leaf margins and leaf centers under potassium deficiency for Brassica napus L.

Authors:  Zhifeng Lu; Tao Ren; Yonghui Pan; Xiaokun Li; Rihuan Cong; Jianwei Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Differences in the photosynthetic plasticity of ferns and Ginkgo grown in experimentally controlled low [O2]:[CO2] atmospheres may explain their contrasting ecological fate across the Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction boundary.

Authors:  C Yiotis; C Evans-Fitz Gerald; J C McElwain
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  A few enlarged chloroplasts are less efficient in photosynthesis than a large population of small chloroplasts in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Dongliang Xiong; Jianliang Huang; Shaobing Peng; Yong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Stomatal Model of Anatomical Tradeoffs Between Gas Exchange and Pathogen Colonization.

Authors:  Christopher D Muir
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.