Literature DB >> 12099349

Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited.

J Flexas1, H Medrano.   

Abstract

There is a long-standing controversy as to whether drought limits photosynthetic CO2 assimilation through stomatal closure or by metabolic impairment in C3 plants. Comparing results from different studies is difficult due to interspecific differences in the response of photosynthesis to leaf water potential and/or relative water content (RWC), the most commonly used parameters to assess the severity of drought. Therefore, we have used stomatal conductance (g) as a basis for comparison of metabolic processes in different studies. The logic is that, as there is a strong link between g and photosynthesis (perhaps co-regulation between them), so different relationships between RWC or water potential and photosynthetic rate and changes in metabolism in different species and studies may be 'normalized' by relating them to g. Re-analysing data from the literature using light-saturated g as a parameter indicative of water deficits in plants shows that there is good correspondence between the onset of drought-induced inhibition of different photosynthetic sub-processes and g. Contents of ribulose bisphosphate (RuBP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) decrease early in drought development, at still relatively high g (higher than 150 mmol H20 m(-2) s(-1)). This suggests that RuBP regeneration and ATP synthesis are impaired. Decreased photochemistry and Rubisco activity typically occur at lower g (<100 mmol H20 m(-2) s(-1)), whereas permanent photoinhibition is only occasional, occurring at very low g (<50 mmol H20 m(-2) s(-1)). Sub-stomatal CO2 concentration decreases as g becomes smaller, but increases again at small g. The analysis suggests that stomatal closure is the earliest response to drought and the dominant limitation to photosynthesis at mild to moderate drought. However, in parallel, progressive down-regulation or inhibition of metabolic processes leads to decreased RuBP content, which becomes the dominant limitation at severe drought, and thereby inhibits photosynthetic CO2 assimilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12099349      PMCID: PMC4233792          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  24 in total

1.  Photosynthesis of oak leaves under water stress: maintenance of high photochemical efficiency of photosystem II and occurrence of non-uniform CO(2) assimilation.

Authors:  D Epron; E Dreyer
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Conformation and activity of chloroplast coupling factor exposed to low chemical potential of water in cells.

Authors:  H M Younis; J S Boyer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1979-11-08

3.  Regulation of Photosynthetic Rate of Two Sunflower Hybrids under Water Stress.

Authors:  C Gimenez; V J Mitchell; D W Lawlor
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Photophosphorylation in Attached Leaves of Helianthus annuus at Low Water Potentials.

Authors:  A Ortiz-Lopez; D R Ort; J S Boyer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Water Deficit and Associated Changes in Some Photosynthetic Parameters in Leaves of ;Valencia' Orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck).

Authors:  J C Vu; G Yelenosky
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Leaf photosynthesis and conductance of selected triticum species at different water potentials.

Authors:  R C Johnson; D W Mornhinweg; D M Ferris; J J Heitholt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Mild water stress effects on carbon-reduction-cycle intermediates, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and spatial homogeneity of photosynthesis in intact leaves.

Authors:  T D Sharkey; J R Seemann
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Analysis of the relative increase in photosynthetic O(2) uptake when photosynthesis in grapevine leaves is inhibited following low night temperatures and/or water stress

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Effects of Water-Deficit Stress on Photosynthesis, Its Components and Component Limitations, and on Water Use Efficiency in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  B Martin; N A Ruiz-Torres
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  ATPase state and activity in thylakoids from normal and water-stressed lupin.

Authors:  S Meyer; Y de Kouchkovsky
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 4.124

View more
  164 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter.

Authors:  H Medrano; J M Escalona; J Bota; J Gulías; J Flexas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Genotypic variation in drought stress response and subsequent recovery of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Authors:  Valya Vassileva; Constant Signarbieux; Iwona Anders; Urs Feller
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Do we underestimate the importance of leaf size in plant economics? Disproportional scaling of support costs within the spectrum of leaf physiognomy.

Authors:  Ulo Niinemets; Angelika Portsmuth; David Tena; Mari Tobias; Silvia Matesanz; Fernando Valladares
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Leaf shape linked to photosynthetic rates and temperature optima in South African Pelargonium species.

Authors:  A B Nicotra; M J Cosgrove; A Cowling; C D Schlichting; C S Jones
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Variation in Rubisco content and activity under variable climatic factors.

Authors:  Jeroni Galmés; Iker Aranjuelo; Hipólito Medrano; Jaume Flexas
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress?

Authors:  Josefina Bota; Hipólito Medrano; Jaume Flexas
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 7.  C4 photosynthesis and water stress.

Authors:  Oula Ghannoum
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  A root proteomics-based insight reveals dynamic regulation of root proteins under progressive drought stress and recovery in Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek.

Authors:  Debashree Sengupta; Monica Kannan; Attipalli R Reddy
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Introgression of novel traits from a wild wheat relative improves drought adaptation in wheat.

Authors:  Dante F Placido; Malachy T Campbell; Jing J Folsom; Xinping Cui; Greg R Kruger; P Stephen Baenziger; Harkamal Walia
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Effects of drought on water content and photosynthetic parameters in potato plants expressing the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ibolya Stiller; Sándor Dulai; Mihály Kondrák; Réka Tarnai; László Szabó; Ottó Toldi; Zsófia Bánfalvi
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.