Literature DB >> 23872539

A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines.

Daniel H Chitwood1, Ravi Kumar, Lauren R Headland, Aashish Ranjan, Michael F Covington, Yasunori Ichihashi, Daniel Fulop, José M Jiménez-Gómez, Jie Peng, Julin N Maloof, Neelima R Sinha.   

Abstract

Introgression lines (ILs), in which genetic material from wild tomato species is introgressed into a domesticated background, have been used extensively in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) improvement. Here, we genotype an IL population derived from the wild desert tomato Solanum pennellii at ultrahigh density, providing the exact gene content harbored by each line. To take advantage of this information, we determine IL phenotypes for a suite of vegetative traits, ranging from leaf complexity, shape, and size to cellular traits, such as stomatal density and epidermal cell phenotypes. Elliptical Fourier descriptors on leaflet outlines provide a global analysis of highly heritable, intricate aspects of leaf morphology. We also demonstrate constraints between leaflet size and leaf complexity, pavement cell size, and stomatal density and show independent segregation of traits previously assumed to be genetically coregulated. Meta-analysis of previously measured traits in the ILs shows an unexpected relationship between leaf morphology and fruit sugar levels, which RNA-Seq data suggest may be attributable to genetically coregulated changes in fruit morphology or the impact of leaf shape on photosynthesis. Together, our results both improve upon the utility of an important genetic resource and attest to a complex, genetic basis for differences in leaf morphology between natural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23872539      PMCID: PMC3753377          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.112391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  77 in total

1.  A pollen factor linking inter- and intraspecific pollen rejection in tomato.

Authors:  Wentao Li; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  A method to construct dose-response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data.

Authors:  Hendrik Poorter; Ulo Niinemets; Achim Walter; Fabio Fiorani; Uli Schurr
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 3.  A census of cells in time: quantitative genetics meets developmental biology.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.834

4.  A library of Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines in cultivated tomato.

Authors:  Michael A Canady; Vladimir Meglic; Roger T Chetelat
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.166

5.  Identification of enzyme activity quantitative trait loci in a Solanum lycopersicum x Solanum pennellii introgression line population.

Authors:  Marie-Caroline Steinhauser; Dirk Steinhauser; Yves Gibon; Marie Bolger; Stéphanie Arrivault; Björn Usadel; Dani Zamir; Alisdair R Fernie; Mark Stitt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Fruit carbohydrate metabolism in an introgression line of tomato with increased fruit soluble solids.

Authors:  Charles J Baxter; Fernando Carrari; Antje Bauke; Sarah Overy; Steven A Hill; Paul W Quick; Alisdair R Fernie; Lee J Sweetlove
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 4.927

7.  SlARF4, an auxin response factor involved in the control of sugar metabolism during tomato fruit development.

Authors:  Maha Sagar; Christian Chervin; Isabelle Mila; Yanwei Hao; Jean-Paul Roustan; Mohamed Benichou; Yves Gibon; Benoît Biais; Pierre Maury; Alain Latché; Jean-Claude Pech; Mondher Bouzayen; Mohamed Zouine
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  GRAMINIFOLIA promotes growth and polarity of Antirrhinum leaves.

Authors:  John F Golz; Mario Roccaro; Robert Kuzoff; Andrew Hudson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Shade avoidance responses are mediated by the ATHB-2 HD-zip protein, a negative regulator of gene expression.

Authors:  C Steindler; A Matteucci; G Sessa; T Weimar; M Ohgishi; T Aoyama; G Morelli; I Ruberti
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Products of leaf primary carbon metabolism modulate the developmental programme determining plant morphology.

Authors:  C A Raines; M J Paul
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  61 in total

1.  Making pore choices: repeated regime shifts in stomatal ratio.

Authors:  Christopher D Muir
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Climate and Developmental Plasticity: Interannual Variability in Grapevine Leaf Morphology.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Susan M Rundell; Darren Y Li; Quaneisha L Woodford; Tommy T Yu; Jose R Lopez; Daniel Greenblatt; Julie Kang; Jason P Londo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology is revealed in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Lockhart
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  A modern ampelography: a genetic basis for leaf shape and venation patterning in grape.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Aashish Ranjan; Ciera C Martinez; Lauren R Headland; Thinh Thiem; Ravi Kumar; Michael F Covington; Tommy Hatcher; Daniel T Naylor; Sharon Zimmerman; Nora Downs; Nataly Raymundo; Edward S Buckler; Julin N Maloof; Mallikarjuna Aradhya; Bernard Prins; Lin Li; Sean Myles; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Mapping morphological shape as a high-dimensional functional curve.

Authors:  Guifang Fu; Mian Huang; Wenhao Bo; Han Hao; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  The Persistent Homology Mathematical Framework Provides Enhanced Genotype-to-Phenotype Associations for Plant Morphology.

Authors:  Mao Li; Margaret H Frank; Viktoriya Coneva; Washington Mio; Daniel H Chitwood; Christopher N Topp
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Genetic Determinants of the Network of Primary Metabolism and Their Relationships to Plant Performance in a Maize Recombinant Inbred Line Population.

Authors:  Weiwei Wen; Kun Li; Saleh Alseekh; Nooshin Omranian; Lijun Zhao; Yang Zhou; Yingjie Xiao; Min Jin; Ning Yang; Haijun Liu; Alexandra Florian; Wenqiang Li; Qingchun Pan; Zoran Nikoloski; Jianbing Yan; Alisdair R Fernie
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Resolving distinct genetic regulators of tomato leaf shape within a heteroblastic and ontogenetic context.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Aashish Ranjan; Ravi Kumar; Yasunori Ichihashi; Kristina Zumstein; Lauren R Headland; Enrique Ostria-Gallardo; José A Aguilar-Martínez; Susan Bush; Leonela Carriedo; Daniel Fulop; Ciera C Martinez; Jie Peng; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Quantitative genetic analysis indicates natural selection on leaf phenotypes across wild tomato species (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae).

Authors:  Christopher D Muir; James B Pease; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Light-Induced Indeterminacy Alters Shade-Avoiding Tomato Leaf Morphology.

Authors:  Daniel H Chitwood; Ravi Kumar; Aashish Ranjan; Julie M Pelletier; Brad T Townsley; Yasunori Ichihashi; Ciera C Martinez; Kristina Zumstein; John J Harada; Julin N Maloof; Neelima R Sinha
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.