Literature DB >> 27631541

Structural and functional correlates of visual field asymmetry in the human brain by diffusion kurtosis MRI and functional MRI.

Caitlin O'Connell1, Leon C Ho, Matthew C Murphy, Ian P Conner, Gadi Wollstein, Rakie Cham, Kevin C Chan.   

Abstract

Human visual performance has been observed to show superiority in localized regions of the visual field across many classes of stimuli. However, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to determine whether the visual information processing in the human brain is dependent on the location of stimuli in the visual field and the corresponding neuroarchitecture using blood-oxygenation-level-dependent functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion kurtosis MRI, respectively, in 15 healthy individuals at 3 T. In fMRI, visual stimulation to the lower hemifield showed stronger brain responses and larger brain activation volumes than the upper hemifield, indicative of the differential sensitivity of the human brain across the visual field. In diffusion kurtosis MRI, the brain regions mapping to the lower visual field showed higher mean kurtosis, but not fractional anisotropy or mean diffusivity compared with the upper visual field. These results suggested the different distributions of microstructural organization across visual field brain representations. There was also a strong positive relationship between diffusion kurtosis and fMRI responses in the lower field brain representations. In summary, this study suggested the structural and functional brain involvements in the asymmetry of visual field responses in humans, and is important to the neurophysiological and psychological understanding of human visual information processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27631541      PMCID: PMC5037044          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  24 in total

1.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Visual field representations and locations of visual areas V1/2/3 in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Robert F Dougherty; Volker M Koch; Alyssa A Brewer; Bernd Fischer; Jan Modersitzki; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  More accurate estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using diffusion Kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Jelle Veraart; Dirk H J Poot; Wim Van Hecke; Ines Blockx; Annemie Van der Linden; Marleen Verhoye; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields.

Authors:  Michael W Levine; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Neural correlates of the visual vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Taosheng Liu; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study.

Authors:  Matthew M Cheung; Edward S Hui; Kevin C Chan; Joseph A Helpern; Liqun Qi; Ed X Wu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Stronger occipital cortical activation to lower than upper visual field stimuli. Neuromagnetic recordings.

Authors:  K Portin; S Vanni; V Virsu; R Hari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A method for quantifying visual field inhomogeneities.

Authors:  Jennifer E Anderson; E Leslie Cameron; Michael W Levine
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  7 in total

1.  Intracameral injection of a chemically cross-linked hydrogel to study chronic neurodegeneration in glaucoma.

Authors:  Kevin C Chan; Yu Yu; Shuk Han Ng; Heather K Mak; Yolanda W Y Yip; Yolandi van der Merwe; Tianmin Ren; Jasmine S Y Yung; Sayantan Biswas; Xu Cao; Ying Chau; Christopher K S Leung
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Anisotropy in the peripheral visual field based on pupil response to the glare illusion.

Authors:  Novera Istiqomah; Yuta Suzuki; Yuya Kinzuka; Tetsuto Minami; Shigeki Nakauchi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-26

3.  Linking individual differences in human primary visual cortex to contrast sensitivity around the visual field.

Authors:  Jonathan Winawer; Marisa Carrasco; Marc M Himmelberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Visual Pathway in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes by Diffusion Tensor MRI and Contrast Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Swarupa Kancherla; William J Kohler; Yolandi van der Merwe; Kevin C Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Age-related Changes in Eye, Brain and Visuomotor Behavior in the DBA/2J Mouse Model of Chronic Glaucoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Ling Yang; Yolandi van der Merwe; Jeffrey Sims; Carlos Parra; Leon C Ho; Joel S Schuman; Gadi Wollstein; Kira L Lathrop; Kevin C Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Improved correspondence of fMRI visual field localizer data after cortex-based macroanatomical alignment.

Authors:  Mishal Qubad; Catherine V Barnes-Scheufler; Michael Schaum; Eva Raspor; Lara Rösler; Benjamin Peters; Carmen Schiweck; Rainer Goebel; Andreas Reif; Robert A Bittner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Cross-dataset reproducibility of human retinotopic maps.

Authors:  Marc M Himmelberg; Jan W Kurzawski; Noah C Benson; Denis G Pelli; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 6.556

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.