Literature DB >> 25522801

Reconstruction of femoro-acetabular offsets using a short-stem.

Karl Philipp Kutzner1, Mark Predrag Kovacevic, Christoph Roeder, Philipp Rehbein, Joachim Pfeil.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the fact that new and modern short-stems allow bone sparing and saving of soft-tissue and muscles, we still face the challenge of anatomically reconstructing the femoro-acetabular offset and leg length. Therefore a radiological and clinical analysis of a short-stem reconstruction of the femoro-acetabular offset and leg length was performed.
METHODS: Using an antero-lateral approach, the optimys short-stem (Mathys Ltd, Bettlach, Switzerland) was implanted in 114 consecutive patients in combination with a cementless cup (Fitmore, Zimmer, Indiana, USA; vitamys RM Pressfit, Mathys Ltd, Bettlach, Switzerland). Pre- and postoperative X-rays were done in a standardized technique. In order to better analyse and compare X-ray data a special double coordinate system was developed for measuring femoral- and acetabular offset. Harris hip score was assessed before and six weeks after surgery. Visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction, leg length difference and the existence of gluteal muscle insufficiency were also examined.
RESULTS: Postoperative femoral offset was significantly increased by a mean of 5.8 mm. At the same time cup implantation significantly decreased the acetabular offset by a mean of 3.7 mm, which resulted in an increased combined femoro-acetabular offset of 2.1 mm. Postoperatively, 81.7% of patients presented with equal leg length. The maximum discrepancy was 10 mm. Clinically, there were no signs of gluteal insufficiency. No luxation occurred during hospitalization. The Harris hip score improved from 47.3 before to 90.1 points already at six weeks after surgery while the mean VAS satisfaction was 9.1.
CONCLUSION: The analysis showed that loss of femoro-acetabular offset can be reduced with an appropriate stem design. Consequently, a good reconstruction of anatomy and leg length can be achieved. In the early postoperative stage the clinical results are excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25522801     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2632-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  17 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Douglas E Padgett; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Isao Asayama; Samatchai Chamnongkich; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration.

Authors:  Mark N Charles; Robert B Bourne; J Roderick Davey; A Seth Greenwald; Bernard F Morrey; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Impingement with total hip replacement.

Authors:  Aamer Malik; Aditya Maheshwari; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Comparison between preoperative digital planning and postoperative outcomes in 197 hip endoprosthesis cases using short stem prostheses.

Authors:  Philip Höhle; Simon M Schröder; Joachim Pfeil
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Effect of femoral component offset on polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D P Sakalkale; P F Sharkey; K Eng; W J Hozack; R H Rothman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Götze; J Ehrenbrink; H Ehrenbrink
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 0.923

8.  Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B J McGrory; B F Morrey; T D Cahalan; K N An; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-11

9.  A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe?

Authors:  Richard Iorio; Jodi Siegel; Lawrence M Specht; John F Tilzey; Audrey Hartman; William L Healy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  20 in total

1.  Short stems reproduce femoral offset better than standard stems in total hip arthroplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Roger Erivan; Anne-Sophie Muller; Guillaume Villatte; Stéphane Millerioux; Aurélien Mulliez; Stéphane Boisgard; Stéphane Descamps
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Preoperative digital planning versus postoperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using a calcar-guided short stem: frequent valgization can be avoided.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Joachim Pfeil; Mark Predrag Kovacevic
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-08

3.  Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Nicola Santori; Francesco Falez; Domenico Potestio; Francesco Saverio Santori
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  More than a feeling?-Overruling the preoperatively templated offset option leads to a minor offset increase in short stem total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Christian Stadler; Rainer Hochgatterer; Jakob Allerstorfer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  The 'critical trochanter angle' does not show superiority over the CCD angle in predicting varus stem alignment in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthias Luger; Sandra Feldler; Lorenz Pisecky; Jakob Allerstorfer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Joachim Pfeil
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  The learning curve in short-stem THA: influence of the surgeon's experience on intraoperative adjustments due to intraoperative radiography.

Authors:  Lennard Loweg; Karl Philipp Kutzner; Matthias Trost; Marlene Hechtner; Philipp Drees; Joachim Pfeil; Michael Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-13

Review 8.  One-stage bilateral implantation of a calcar-guided short-stem in total hip arthroplasty : Minimally invasive modified anterolateral approach in supine position.

Authors:  K P Kutzner; S Donner; M Schneider; J Pfeil; P Rehbein
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Outcome of extensive varus and valgus stem alignment in short-stem THA: clinical and radiological analysis using EBRA-FCA.

Authors:  Karl Philipp Kutzner; Tobias Freitag; Stefanie Donner; Mark Predrag Kovacevic; Ralf Bieger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Georgios Gkagkalis; Patrick Goetti; Sabine Mai; Ingmar Meinecke; Näder Helmy; Dominique Bosson; Karl Philipp Kutzner
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.