Literature DB >> 25521876

Tobacco industry use of personal responsibility rhetoric in public relations and litigation: disguising freedom to blame as freedom of choice.

Lissy C Friedman1, Andrew Cheyne, Daniel Givelber, Mark A Gottlieb, Richard A Daynard.   

Abstract

We examined the tobacco industry's rhetoric to frame personal responsibility arguments. The industry rarely uses the phrase "personal responsibility" explicitly, but rather "freedom of choice." When freedom of choice is used in the context of litigation, the industry means that those who choose to smoke are solely to blame for their injuries. When used in the industry's public relations messages, it grounds its meaning in the concept of liberty and the right to smoke. The courtroom "blame rhetoric" has influenced the industry's larger public relations message to shift responsibility away from the tobacco companies and onto their customers. Understanding the rhetoric and framing that the industry employs is essential to combating this tactic, and we apply this comprehension to other industries that act as disease vectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25521876      PMCID: PMC4318333          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  26 in total

1.  Assuming the risk: the mavericks, the lawyers, and the whistleblowers who beat big tobacco

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-19

2.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Collective actors and corporate targets in tobacco control: a cross-national comparison.

Authors:  Constance A Nathanson
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2005-06

4.  Public health advocacy to change corporate practices: implications for health education practice and research.

Authors:  Nicholas Freudenberg
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2005-06

5.  Industrial epidemics, public health advocacy and the alcohol industry: lessons from other fields.

Authors:  René I Jahiel; Thomas F Babor
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Word wars and tobacco control: saying what needs saying that we don't yet know how to say, or saying it better.

Authors:  Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries.

Authors:  Rob Moodie; David Stuckler; Carlos Monteiro; Nick Sheron; Bruce Neal; Thaksaphon Thamarangsi; Paul Lincoln; Sally Casswell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Understanding Philip Morris's pursuit of US government regulation of tobacco.

Authors:  P A McDaniel; R E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?

Authors:  Kelly D Brownell; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  The debate on regulating menthol cigarettes: closing a dangerous loophole vs freedom of choice.

Authors:  Andrew Cheyne; Lori Dorfman; Richard A Daynard; Pamela Mejia; Mark Gottlieb
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  16 in total

1.  Containing diffusion: the tobacco industry's multipronged trade strategy to block tobacco standardised packaging.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Robert Eckford; Stella Bialous
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Food as harm reduction during a drinking session: reducing the harm or normalising harmful use of alcohol? A qualitative comparative analysis of alcohol industry and non-alcohol industry-funded guidance.

Authors:  Anna Ramsbottom; May C I van Schalkwyk; Lauren Carters-White; Yasmine Benylles; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2022-06-25

3.  Reactance to Health Warnings Scale: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Marissa G Hall; Paschal Sheeran; Seth M Noar; Kurt M Ribisl; Laura E Bach; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2016-10

4.  Emotion in the Law and the Lab: The Case of Graphic Cigarette Warnings.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Abigail T Evans; Natalie Hemmerich; Micah Berman
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

5.  Gamblers' perceptions of responsibility for gambling harm: a critical qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Sarah Marko; Samantha L Thomas; Kim Robinson; Mike Daube
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  New Zealand policy experts' appraisal of interventions to reduce smoking in young adults: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Jude Ball; Janet Hoek; El Shadan Tautolo; Heather Gifford
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Towards environmentally sustainable human behaviour: targeting non-conscious and conscious processes for effective and acceptable policies.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  A comparative content analysis of media reporting of sports betting in Australia: lessons for public health media advocacy approaches.

Authors:  Jennifer L David; Samantha L Thomas; Melanie Randle; Steven J Bowe; Mike Daube
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Why media representations of corporations matter for public health policy: a scoping review.

Authors:  Heide Weishaar; Lori Dorfman; Nicholas Freudenberg; Benjamin Hawkins; Katherine Smith; Oliver Razum; Shona Hilton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Reappraising Choice in Addiction: Novel Conceptualizations and Treatments for Tobacco Use Disorder.

Authors:  Amanda M Palmer; Benjamin A Toll; Matthew J Carpenter; Eric C Donny; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Alana M Rojewski; Tracy T Smith; Mehmet Sofuoglu; Johannes Thrul; Neal L Benowitz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.