Literature DB >> 29680829

Containing diffusion: the tobacco industry's multipronged trade strategy to block tobacco standardised packaging.

Eric Crosbie1, Robert Eckford2, Stella Bialous1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the tobacco industry's strategy of using trade and investment agreements to prevent the global diffusion of standardised packaging (SP) of tobacco products.
METHODS: Review of tobacco industry documents, relevant government documents and media items. The data were triangulated and thematically analysed.
RESULTS: Internal tobacco industry documents reveal that during the early 1990s, tobacco companies developed a multipronged trade strategy to prevent the global diffusion of progressive tobacco packaging and labelling proposals, including SP. This strategy consisted of (1) framing the health issue in terms of trade and investment, (2) detailing alleged legal violations concerning trade barriers, intellectual property and investment rights, (3) threatening legal suits and reputational damage, and (4) garnering third-party support. These efforts helped delay SP until 2010 when Australia became the first country to reintroduce SP proposals, followed by governments in the UK and New Zealand in 2012, Ireland in 2013 and France in 2014. Review of government documents and media sources in each of the five countries indicate the industry continues to employ this multipronged strategy throughout the SP policy's progression. Although this strategy is tailored towards each domestic context, the overall tobacco industry's trade strategy remains consistently focused on shifting the attention away from public health and towards the realm of trade and investment with more corporate-friendly allies.
CONCLUSION: Governments seeking to implement SP need to be prepared to resist and counter the industry's multipronged trade strategy by avoiding trade diversions, exposing false industry legal and reputational claims, and monitoring third-party support. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  packaging and labelling; public policy; tobacco industry; tobacco industry documents

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29680829      PMCID: PMC6196123          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  34 in total

Review 1.  WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: development of an evidence based global public health treaty.

Authors:  Kenji Shibuya; Christina Ciecierski; Emmanuel Guindon; Douglas W Bettcher; David B Evans; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-19

2.  Tobacco industry success in Costa Rica: the importance of FCTC article 5.3.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

3.  Smokers' reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: a comparison between Mexico and Canada.

Authors:  James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong; Edna Arillo-Santillán
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2007

4.  Attack on Australia: tobacco industry challenges to plain packaging.

Authors:  Holly Jarman
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  Analysis of the logic and framing of a tobacco industry campaign opposing standardised packaging legislation in New Zealand.

Authors:  Andrew Morehu Waa; Janet Hoek; Richard Edwards; James Maclaurin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Individual versus corporate responsibility for smoking-related illness: Australian press coverage of the Rolah McCabe trial.

Authors:  Melanie Wakefield; Kim McLeod; Katherine Clegg Smith
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Attempts to undermine tobacco control: tobacco industry "youth smoking prevention" programs to undermine meaningful tobacco control in Latin America.

Authors:  Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Corporate social responsibility and access to policy élites: an analysis of tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  Gary J Fooks; Anna B Gilmore; Katherine E Smith; Jeff Collin; Chris Holden; Kelley Lee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  'It will harm business and increase illicit trade': an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012.

Authors:  K A Evans-Reeves; J L Hatchard; A B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Smokefree implementation in Colombia: Monitoring, outside funding, and business support.

Authors:  Randy Uang; Eric Crosbie; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  The tobacco industry's challenges to standardised packaging: A comparative analysis of issue framing in public relations campaigns in four countries.

Authors:  Ross MacKenzie; Annalise Mathers; Benjamin Hawkins; Jappe Eckhardt; Julia Smith
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Exceeding WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Obligations: Nepal Overcoming Tobacco Industry Interference to Enact a Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy.

Authors:  Dharma N Bhatta; Stella Bialous; Eric Crosbie; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Defending Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy Implementation in Nepal From Tobacco Industry Interference (2011-2018).

Authors:  Dharma N Bhatta; Eric Crosbie; Stella A Bialous; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Impact of implementation of the WHO FCTC on the tobacco industry's behaviour.

Authors:  Stella Aguinaga Bialous
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Standardised packaging, minimum excise tax, and RYO focussed tax rise implications for UK tobacco pricing.

Authors:  Rosemary Hiscock; Nicole H Augustin; J Robert Branston; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  How to combat efforts to overturn bans on electronic nicotine delivery systems: lessons from tobacco industry efforts during the 1980s to open closed cigarette markets in Thailand.

Authors:  Roengrudee Patanavanich; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-01

7.  Hollow Threats: Transnational Food and Beverage Companies' Use of International Agreements to Fight Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling in Mexico and Beyond.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Angela Carriedo; Laura Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-06-01

8.  Overcoming tobacco industry opposition to standardized packaging in the Americas.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Luciana C Borges; Robert Eckford; Ernesto M Sebrié; Gianella Severini; Stella A Bialous
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2022-05-10

9.  Expanding our understanding of industry opposition to help implement sugar-sweetened beverage taxation.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Davis Florence
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.022

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.