BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy may result in major deformities and asymmetries in approximately one-third of patients. Although oncoplastic surgery (OP) could be a useful alternative to avoid them, lack of strong data is causing some debate. The purpose of this study was to compare aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing OP versus lumpectomy using three different assessment methods. METHODS: A total of 122 patients were included in this cross-sectional multicentric study; 57 underwent OP (46.7 %), and 65 underwent lumpectomy (53.3 %). Two breast surgeons and two plastic surgeons from different institutions using the Garbay scale independently evaluated aesthetic outcomes. BCCT.core software was applied in both groups, and the patients evaluated their aesthetic outcomes answering a questionnaire about their satisfaction rate. RESULTS: OP group had a higher proportion of excellent aesthetic results according to the BCCT.core software analysis (p = 0.028) and the specialists (p = 0.002). Multifactorial analyses showed that age ≥70 years (RP = 6.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.73-21.0; p = 0.005), tumors in the medial, inferior, and central quadrants (RP = 4.21; 95 % CI 1.88-9.44; p < 0.001), and large breasts (RP = 7.55; 95 % CI 2.48-23.0; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for poor aesthetic outcomes after lumpectomy. The patients classified their results as better than those by the specialists and by the software, with no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent aesthetic results were more frequent in the OP group according to BCCT.core software analysis and specialists. In addition, some clinical conditions and tumor locations in the breast can be considered risky factors for poor aesthetic outcomes in lumpectomy.
BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy may result in major deformities and asymmetries in approximately one-third of patients. Although oncoplastic surgery (OP) could be a useful alternative to avoid them, lack of strong data is causing some debate. The purpose of this study was to compare aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing OP versus lumpectomy using three different assessment methods. METHODS: A total of 122 patients were included in this cross-sectional multicentric study; 57 underwent OP (46.7 %), and 65 underwent lumpectomy (53.3 %). Two breast surgeons and two plastic surgeons from different institutions using the Garbay scale independently evaluated aesthetic outcomes. BCCT.core software was applied in both groups, and the patients evaluated their aesthetic outcomes answering a questionnaire about their satisfaction rate. RESULTS: OP group had a higher proportion of excellent aesthetic results according to the BCCT.core software analysis (p = 0.028) and the specialists (p = 0.002). Multifactorial analyses showed that age ≥70 years (RP = 6.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.73-21.0; p = 0.005), tumors in the medial, inferior, and central quadrants (RP = 4.21; 95 % CI 1.88-9.44; p < 0.001), and large breasts (RP = 7.55; 95 % CI 2.48-23.0; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for poor aesthetic outcomes after lumpectomy. The patients classified their results as better than those by the specialists and by the software, with no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent aesthetic results were more frequent in the OP group according to BCCT.core software analysis and specialists. In addition, some clinical conditions and tumor locations in the breast can be considered risky factors for poor aesthetic outcomes in lumpectomy.
Authors: Benjamin D Smith; Xiudong Lei; Kevin Diao; Ying Xu; Yu Shen; Grace L Smith; Sharon H Giordano; Sarah M DeSnyder; Kelly K Hunt; Mediget Teshome; Reshma Jagsi; Simona F Shaitelman; Susan K Peterson; Cameron W Swanick Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: I G Papanikolaou; C Dimitrakakis; F Zagouri; S Marinopoulos; A Giannos; E Zografos; C G Zografos; D Kritikou; A Rodolakis; G C Zografos; D Loutradis Journal: Breast Cancer Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 4.239
Authors: Anne E Mattingly; Zhenjun Ma; Paul D Smith; John V Kiluk; Nazanin Khakpour; Susan J Hoover; Christine Laronga; M Catherine Lee Journal: South Med J Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: Maria V Ermoshchenkova; Aziz D Zikiryahodjaev; Igor V Reshetov; Dmitriy S Svyatoslavov; Mikhail Y Sinelnikov Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2021-07-13
Authors: Idam de Oliveira-Junior; Igor de Araujo da Silva; Fabíola Cristina Brandini da Silva; Jonathas José da Silva; Almir José Sarri; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; René Aloisio da Costa Vieira Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 2.268