Literature DB >> 35445184

Patient Satisfaction and Surgical Outcome After Oncoplastic Reconstruction following Radical Lumpectomy Versus Standard Lumpectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Eyal Barkai1, Yossi Namir2, Orit Golan3, Yoav Barnea1,2, Ehud Arad1,2, Tehillah S Menes1,4.   

Abstract

Objective: Oncoplastic reconstruction (OR) enables widening of the indications for breast conserving therapy (BCT) and is redefining the limits of breast conservation. We examined the outcome and satisfaction of patients undergoing OR after radical lumpectomy (excision of more than 25% of the breast volume) and compared it to the outcome of women undergoing OR after standard lumpectomy. Materials and
Methods: A retrospective, cohort study, including all patients undergoing OR after BCT between 2009 and 2018, was conducted. The ratio of volume of excision to breast volume was calculated using imaging studies. The study group included women that had more than 25% of their breast volume removed. The remainder formed the control group. Demographic characteristics, oncological treatment, and operation properties were collected. We compared post-operative complications, margin status and need for further surgery, as well as patient satisfaction, evaluated using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire.
Results: One hundred and fifty women were included, of whom 24 (16%) comprised the study group with a mean breast volume reduction of 39%, while the remainder (mean volume reduction 8%) served as controls. Patient, tumor characteristics and treatment were comparable. There was a non-significant higher proportion of women in the radical group that underwent a second operation due to complications or positive margins [4/24 (16.7%) vs. 14/126 (11%), p = 0.4). Physical well-being was similar but satisfaction with breasts and with outcome was slightly lower for the study group. These differences did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusion: Surgical outcome and patient satisfaction in women undergoing very extensive breast resections with OR are comparable to standard resections. ©Copyright 2022 by the the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies / European Journal of Breast Health published by Galenos Publishing House.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BREAST-Q; Oncoplastic reconstruction; breast conserving therapy; patient satisfaction; radical lumpectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35445184      PMCID: PMC8987856          DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2021-12-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Breast Health


  22 in total

1.  Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is oncologically safe when compared to wide local excision and mastectomy.

Authors:  J Mansell; E Weiler-Mithoff; S Stallard; J C Doughty; E Mallon; L Romics
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  C D'Aniello; L Grimaldi; A Barbato; B Bosi; A Carli
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  1999-12

3.  Comparative study of surgical margins in oncoplastic surgery and quadrantectomy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Navneet Kaur; Jean-Yves Petit; Mario Rietjens; Fausto Maffini; Alberto Luini; Giovanna Gatti; Pier Carlo Rey; Cicero Urban; Francesca De Lorenzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Multicentric mammary carcinoma: evidence of monoclonal proliferation.

Authors:  Lavinia P Middleton; George Vlastos; Nadeem Q Mirza; S Eva; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Reduces Mastectomy and Postoperative Re-excision Rates.

Authors:  Angelena Crown; Debra G Wechter; Janie W Grumley
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The influence of breast size on late radiation effects and association with radiotherapy dose inhomogeneity.

Authors:  A M Moody; W P Mayles; J M Bliss; R P A'Hern; J R Owen; J Regan; B Broad; J R Yarnold
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction.

Authors:  K B Clough; J Cuminet; A Fitoussi; C Nos; V Mosseri
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Conservative surgery for multifocal/multicentric breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthijs V Nijenhuis; Emiel J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Survival is Better After Breast Conserving Therapy than Mastectomy for Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Registry-Based Follow-up Study of Norwegian Women Primary Operated Between 1998 and 2008.

Authors:  Olaf Johan Hartmann-Johnsen; Rolf Kåresen; Ellen Schlichting; Jan F Nygård
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.