Literature DB >> 28973708

Early Postoperative Complications after Oncoplastic Reduction.

Anne E Mattingly1, Zhenjun Ma1, Paul D Smith1, John V Kiluk1, Nazanin Khakpour1, Susan J Hoover1, Christine Laronga1, M Catherine Lee1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy (BCT) has been established as safe oncologically. Oncoplastic breast surgery uses both oncologic and plastic surgery techniques for breast conservation to improve cosmetic outcomes. We evaluated the risk factors associated with complications after oncoplastic breast reduction.
METHODS: A single-institution, institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of electronic medical records of female patients with breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic breast reduction from 2008 to 2014. A review of electronic medical records collected relevant medical history, clinical and pathological information, and data on postoperative complications within 6 months stratified into major or minor complications. Categorical variables analyzed with the χ2 exact method; continuous variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test exact method.
RESULTS: We identified 59 patients; 4 required re-excision for positive margins, and 1 moved on to completion mastectomy. The overall complication rate was 33.9% (n = 20): 12 major (20.3%) and 8 minor (13.6%). Of the continuous variables (age, body mass index, and tissue removed), increased age was associated with minor complications (P = 0.02). Among the categorical variables (stratified body mass index, prior breast surgery, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, vascular disease, pulmonary disease, and stratified weight of tissue removed), none were associated with overall or major complications. Pulmonary disease was associated with minor complications (P = 0.03). Bilateral versus unilateral oncoplastic breast reduction showed no statistically significant increase in complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall complication rate after oncoplastic breast reduction was markedly higher than that in nationally published data for breast-conserving surgery. The complication rate resembled more closely the complication rate after bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. No risk factors were associated with major or overall complications. Age and pulmonary disease were associated with minor complications. Patients should be selected and counseled appropriately when considering oncoplastic breast reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28973708      PMCID: PMC7771341          DOI: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  15 in total

1.  The Effect of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy on Perioperative Complications in Women Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Amanda K Silva; Brittany Lapin; Katharine A Yao; David H Song; Mark Sisco
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Tina J Hieken; James W Jakub; Amy C Degnim; Clive S Grant; David R Farley; Kristine M Thomsen; John B Osborn; Gary L Keeney; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Preoperative prediction of cosmetic results in breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Elvira L Vos; Anton H J Koning; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Victorien M T van Verschuer; Cornelis Verhoef; Peter J van der Spek; Marian B Menke-Pluijmers; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Outcome analysis of immediate and delayed conservative breast surgery reconstruction with mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Cláudia Maria Aldrighi; Eduardo Montag; Eduardo Arruda; José Augusto Brasil; José Roberto Filassi; José Mendes Aldrighi; Rolf Gemperli; Marcus Castro Ferreira
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Long-Term Comparison of Aesthetical Outcomes After Oncoplastic Surgery and Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Gabriela Santos; Cicero Urban; Maria Isabel Edelweiss; Gustavo Zucca-Matthes; Vilmar Marques de Oliveira; Gabriel Hubner Arana; Marco Iera; Mario Rietjens; Rubens Silveira de Lima; Cleverton Spautz; Flávia Kuroda; Karina Anselmi; Edison Capp
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Meena S Moran; Stuart J Schnitt; Armando E Giuliano; Jay R Harris; Seema A Khan; Janet Horton; Suzanne Klimberg; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Gary Freedman; Nehmat Houssami; Peggy L Johnson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  A systematic review of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: current weaknesses and future prospects.

Authors:  Max H Haloua; Nicole M A Krekel; Henri A H Winters; Derek H F Rietveld; Sybren Meijer; Frank W Bloemers; Monique P van den Tol
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A Comparative Retrospective Analysis of Complications After Oncoplastic Breast Reduction and Breast Reduction for Benign Macromastia: Are These Procedures Equally Safe?

Authors:  Thomas A Imahiyerobo; Lindsay A Pharmer; Alexander J Swistel; Mia Talmor
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Deanna Attai; Dunya Atisha; Peter Beitsch; Linda Bosserman; Judy Boughey; Jodi Carter; Stephen Edge; Sheldon Feldman; Joshua Froman; Caprice Greenberg; Cary Kaufman; Monica Morrow; Barbara Pockaj; Melvin Silverstein; Lawrence Solin; Alicia Staley; Frank Vicini; Lee Wilke; Wei Yang; Hiram Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  5 in total

1.  Future perspectives for breast conservation treatment: science & art.

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Edibaldo Silva
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

Review 2.  The sick lobe hypothesis, field cancerisation and the new era of precision breast surgery.

Authors:  Mona P Tan; Tibor Tot
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

3.  Outcome reporting in therapeutic mammaplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Lee; Richard M Kwasnicki; Hasaan Khan; Yasmin Grant; Abigail Chan; Angela E E Fanshawe; Daniel R Leff
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-11-09

Review 4.  Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Bulent Citgez; Banu Yigit; Soysal Bas
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  Outcomes of Margin Reexcision after Oncoplastic Breast Reduction.

Authors:  Tasha A Martin; Salman Choudhry; Luther H Holton; W Charles Mylander; Lorraine Tafra; Wen Liang; Rubie Sue Jackson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-09-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.