Literature DB >> 25519295

Comparative performance assessment of point-of-care testing devices for measuring glucose and ketones at the patient bedside.

Ferruccio Ceriotti1, Ewa Kaczmarek2, Elena Guerra2, Fabrizio Mastrantonio3, Fausto Lucarelli3, Francesco Valgimigli3, Andrea Mosca4.   

Abstract

Point-of-care (POC) testing devices for monitoring glucose and ketones can play a key role in the management of dysglycemia in hospitalized diabetes patients. The accuracy of glucose devices can be influenced by biochemical changes that commonly occur in critically ill hospital patients and by the medication prescribed. Little is known about the influence of these factors on ketone POC measurements. The aim of this study was to assess the analytical performance of POC hospital whole-blood glucose and ketone meters and the extent of glucose interference factors on the design and accuracy of ketone results. StatStrip glucose/ketone, Optium FreeStyle glucose/ketone, and Accu-Chek Performa glucose were also assessed and results compared to a central laboratory reference method. The analytical evaluation was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocols for precision, linearity, method comparison, and interference. The interferences assessed included acetoacetate, acetaminophen, ascorbic acid, galactose, maltose, uric acid, and sodium. The accuracies of both Optium ketone and glucose measurements were significantly influenced by varying levels of hematocrit and ascorbic acid. StatStrip ketone and glucose measurements were unaffected by the interferences tested with exception of ascorbic acid, which reduced the higher level ketone value. The accuracy of Accu-Chek glucose measurements was affected by hematocrit, by ascorbic acid, and significantly by galactose. The method correlation assessment indicated differences between the meters in compliance to ISO 15197 and CLSI 12-A3 performance criteria. Combined POC glucose/ketone methods are now available. The use of these devices in a hospital setting requires careful consideration with regard to the selection of instruments not sensitive to hematocrit variation and presence of interfering substances.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glucose; ketones; performance evaluation; point-of-care testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25519295      PMCID: PMC4604596          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814563351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  32 in total

1.  Evaluation of hematocrit bias on blood glucose measurement with six different portable glucose meters.

Authors:  Massimo Daves; Roberto Cemin; Bruno Fattor; Giovanni Cosio; Gian Luca Salvagno; Francesco Rizza; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 2.  Quality of glucose measurement with blood glucose meters at the point-of-care: relevance of interfering factors.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Tight glycemic control and point-of-care testing.

Authors:  David Alter; Greg Deines
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.935

4.  Evaluation of point-of-care blood glucose measurements in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome admitted to a critical care unit.

Authors:  Dawn E Corl; Tom S Yin; Michelle E Mills; Tina L Spencer; Lucy Greenfield; Erin Beauchemin; Jessica Cochran; Louise D Suhr; Rachel E Thompson; Brent E Wisse
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

5.  Precision and accuracy: comparison of point-of-care and laboratory glucose concentrations in cardiothoracic surgery patients.

Authors:  Quin E Denfeld; Teresa T Goodell; Kelly N Stafford; Steve Kazmierczak
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Ascorbate combination therapy: new tool in the anticancer toolbox?

Authors:  Melanie J McConnell; Patries M Herst
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Blood ketone bodies in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes (a multicenter study).

Authors:  Francesco Prisco; Antonio Picardi; Dario Iafusco; Renata Lorini; Laura Minicucci; Marco Evi Martinucci; Sonia Toni; Ferruccio Cerutti; Ivana Rabbone; Raffaella Buzzetti; Antonio Crino; Paolo Pozzilli
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  Two site evaluation of the performance of a new generation point-of-care glucose meter for use in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Kristina A Tendl; Jürgen Christoph; Adele Bohn; Kurt R Herkner; Arnold Pollak; Andrea-Romana Prusa
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Evaluation of a bedside blood ketone sensor: the effects of acidosis, hyperglycaemia and acetoacetate on sensor performance.

Authors:  A S A Khan; J A Talbot; K L Tieszen; E A Gardener; J M Gibson; J P New
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Spurious elevation of glucose concentration during administration of high dose of ascorbic acid in a patient with type 2 diabetes on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Soo Kyoung Kim; Jong Ryeal Hahm; Ho-Su Kim; Sungsu Kim; Tae Sik Jung; Jung Hwa Jung; Hye Ryun Lee; Deok Ryong Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  12 in total

1.  Impact of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C for Treatment of Sepsis on Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Readings.

Authors:  Anna Peyton Howell; Jenna L Parrett; Daniel R Malcom
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Evaluation of Nova StatStrip and FreeStyle Precision Pro blood ketone tests using 3-hydroxybutyrate doped samples.

Authors:  Johanna Helmersson-Karlqvist; Kristina Höög Hammarström; Kicki Palmberg; Carolina Backman-Johansson
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 3.  Blood Ketones: Measurement, Interpretation, Limitations, and Utility in the Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis.

Authors:  Ketan Dhatariya
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 4.  Exogenous Ketone Supplements in Athletic Contexts: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Mark Evans; Tyler S McClure; Andrew P Koutnik; Brendan Egan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Exogenous Ketone Supplementation and Keto-Adaptation for Endurance Performance: Disentangling the Effects of Two Distinct Metabolic States.

Authors:  David M Shaw; Fabrice Merien; Andrea Braakhuis; Ed Maunder; Deborah K Dulson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  High-dose vitamin-C induced prolonged factitious hyperglycemia in a peritoneal dialysis patient: a case report.

Authors:  Olivier Lachance; François Goyer; Neill K J Adhikari; Marie-Hélène Masse; Jean-François Bilodeau; François Lamontagne; Marc-André Leclair
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-21

7.  Prevalence of ketosis, ketonuria, and ketoacidosis during liberal glycemic control in critically ill patients with diabetes: an observational study.

Authors:  Nora Luethi; Luca Cioccari; Marco Crisman; Rinaldo Bellomo; Glenn M Eastwood; Johan Mårtensson
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Highly specific and rapid glycan based amperometric detection of influenza viruses.

Authors:  Xikai Cui; Amrita Das; Abasaheb N Dhawane; Joyce Sweeney; Xiaohu Zhang; Vasanta Chivukula; Suri S Iyer
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  The role of point-of-care 3-hydroxybutyrate testing in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing coronary angiography.

Authors:  S Vigili de Kreutzenberg; A Avogaro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Effect of a Whey Protein Supplement on Preservation of Fat Free Mass in Overweight and Obese Individuals on an Energy Restricted Very Low Caloric Diet.

Authors:  Anne Ellegaard Larsen; Bo Martin Bibby; Mette Hansen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.