Literature DB >> 25516665

Endoscopic non-technical skills team training: the next step in quality assurance of endoscopy training.

Manmeet Matharoo1, Adam Haycock1, Nick Sevdalis1, Siwan Thomas-Gibson1.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether novel, non-technical skills training for Bowel Cancer Screening (BCS) endoscopy teams enhanced patient safety knowledge and attitudes.
METHODS: A novel endoscopy team training intervention for BCS teams was developed and evaluated as a pre-post intervention study. Four multi-disciplinary BCS teams constituting BCS endoscopist(s), specialist screening practitioners, endoscopy nurses and administrative staff (A) from English BCS training centres participated. No patients were involved in this study. Expert multidisciplinary faculty delivered a single day's training utilising real clinical examples. Pre and post-course evaluation comprised participants' patient safety awareness, attitudes, and knowledge. Global course evaluations were also collected.
RESULTS: Twenty-three participants attended and their patient safety knowledge improved significantly from 43%-55% (P ≤ 0.001) following the training intervention. 12/41 (29%) of the safety attitudes items significantly improved in the areas of perceived patient safety knowledge and awareness. The remaining safety attitude items: perceived influence on patient safety, attitudes towards error management, error management actions and personal views following an error were unchanged following training. Both qualitative and quantitative global course evaluations were positive: 21/23 (91%) participants strongly agreed/agreed that they were satisfied with the course. Qualitative evaluation included mandating such training for endoscopy teams outside BCS and incorporating team training within wider endoscopy training. Limitations of the study include no measure of increased patient safety in clinical practice following training.
CONCLUSION: A novel comprehensive training package addressing patient safety, non-technical skills and adverse event analysis was successful in improving multi-disciplinary teams' knowledge and safety attitudes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; Bowel cancer screening; Endoscopy Training; Patient safety; Teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25516665      PMCID: PMC4265612          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  Human error: models and management.

Authors:  J Reason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

2.  Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review.

Authors:  C Vincent; G Neale; M Woloshynowych
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

3.  The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.

Authors:  R L Helmreich; A C Merritt; J A Wilhelm
Journal:  Int J Aviat Psychol       Date:  1999

4.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II.

Authors:  L L Leape; T A Brennan; N Laird; A G Lawthers; A R Localio; B A Barnes; L Hebert; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term.

Authors:  S Thomas-Gibson; P Bassett; N Suzuki; G J Brown; C B Williams; B P Saunders
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 7.  Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis.

Authors:  C R Paris; E Salas; J A Cannon-Bowers
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?

Authors:  C J A Bowles; R Leicester; C Romaya; E Swarbrick; C B Williams; O Epstein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Computer simulation training enhances patient comfort during endoscopy.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack; Joseph C Kolars; Jeffrey A Alexander
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Patient safety: helping medical students understand error in healthcare.

Authors:  Rona Patey; Rhona Flin; Brian H Cuthbertson; Louise MacDonald; Kathryn Mearns; Jennifer Cleland; David Williams
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-08
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Adverse Event and Complication Management in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  James M Richter; Peter B Kelsey; Emily J Campbell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Improving safety and reducing error in endoscopy: simulation training in human factors.

Authors:  Srivathsan Ravindran; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Sam Murray; Eleanor Wood
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-01-09

3.  Improving quality in endoscopy: are we nearly there yet?

Authors:  Andy Veitch; Matt Rutter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-13

4.  Safe endoscopy.

Authors:  Manmeet Matharoo; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system.

Authors:  Srivathsan Ravindran; Adam Haycock; Katherine Woolf; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-03-06

6.  Improving quality in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Matthew Banks
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-24

7.  A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Manmeet Matharoo; Adam Haycock; Nick Sevdalis; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-17

Review 8.  Non-technical skills and gastrointestinal endoscopy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Charlotte R Hitchins; Magdalena Metzner; Judy Edworthy; Catherine Ward
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-29

Review 9.  What do patients want from their endoscopy experience? The importance of measuring and understanding patient attitudes to their care.

Authors:  M Tierney; R Bevan; C J Rees; T M Trebble
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-03

10.  Factors defining expertise in screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kinesh Patel; Anna Pinto; Omar Faiz; Matt Rutter; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.