OBJECTIVE: To change the culture of healthcare organisations and improve patient safety, new professionals need to be taught about adverse events and how to trap and mitigate against errors. A literature review did not reveal any patient safety courses in the core undergraduate medical curriculum. Therefore a new module was designed and piloted. DESIGN: A 5-h evidence-based module on understanding error in healthcare was designed with a preliminary evaluation using self-report questionnaires. SETTING: A UK medical school. PARTICIPANTS: 110 final year students. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants completed two questionnaires: the first questionnaire was designed to measure students' self-ratings of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour in relation to patient safety and medical error, and was administered before and approximately 1 year after the module; the second formative questionnaire on the teaching process and how it could be improved was administered after completion of the module. CONCLUSIONS: Before attending the module, the students reported they had little understanding of patient safety matters. One year later, only knowledge and the perceived personal control over safety had improved. The students rated the teaching process highly and found the module valuable. Longitudinal follow-up is required to provide more information on the lasting impact of the module.
OBJECTIVE: To change the culture of healthcare organisations and improve patient safety, new professionals need to be taught about adverse events and how to trap and mitigate against errors. A literature review did not reveal any patient safety courses in the core undergraduate medical curriculum. Therefore a new module was designed and piloted. DESIGN: A 5-h evidence-based module on understanding error in healthcare was designed with a preliminary evaluation using self-report questionnaires. SETTING: A UK medical school. PARTICIPANTS: 110 final year students. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Participants completed two questionnaires: the first questionnaire was designed to measure students' self-ratings of knowledge, attitudes and behaviour in relation to patient safety and medical error, and was administered before and approximately 1 year after the module; the second formative questionnaire on the teaching process and how it could be improved was administered after completion of the module. CONCLUSIONS: Before attending the module, the students reported they had little understanding of patient safety matters. One year later, only knowledge and the perceived personal control over safety had improved. The students rated the teaching process highly and found the module valuable. Longitudinal follow-up is required to provide more information on the lasting impact of the module.
Authors: Yanli Nie; Lin Li; Yurong Duan; Peixian Chen; Bruce H Barraclough; Mingming Zhang; Jing Li Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Matthew A Kirkman; Nick Sevdalis; Sonal Arora; Paul Baker; Charles Vincent; Maria Ahmed Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Claire L Teigland; Rachel C Blasiak; Lindsay A Wilson; Rachel E Hines; Karen L Meyerhoff; Anthony J Viera Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 2.463