Literature DB >> 26753887

Adverse Event and Complication Management in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

James M Richter1, Peter B Kelsey1, Emily J Campbell1.   

Abstract

Gastrointestinal endoscopy is a remarkably safe set of diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, and yet a small number of significant complications and adverse events are expected. Serious complications may have a material effect on the patient's health and well-being. They need to be anticipated and prevented if possible and managed effectively when identified. When complications occur they need to be discussed frankly with patients and their families. Informed consent, prevention, early detection, reporting, and systems improvement are critical aspects of effective complication management. Optimal complication management may improve patient satisfaction and outcome, as well as preserving the reputation and confidence of the endoscopist, and may minimize litigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26753887     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  31 in total

1.  Understanding and responding to adverse events.

Authors:  Charles Vincent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  When things go wrong: responding to adverse events: a consensus statement of the Harvard hospitals.

Authors:  Suzanne K Powell
Journal:  Lippincotts Case Manag       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons.

Authors:  W Levinson; D L Roter; J P Mullooly; V T Dull; R M Frankel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Glenn M Eisen; Lars Aabakken; Todd H Baron; Matt M Hutter; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Albert Nemcek; Bret T Petersen; John L Petrini; Irving M Pike; Linda Rabeneck; Joseph Romagnuolo; John J Vargo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Have you had an ERCP lawsuit yet?

Authors:  Peter B Cotton
Journal:  Gastroenterol Nurs       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.978

7.  Medical malpractice litigation related to gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japan: a two-decade review of civil court cases.

Authors:  Toru Hiyama; Shinji Tanaka; Masaharu Yoshihara; Tatsuma Fukuhara; Shinichi Mukai; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992.

Authors:  A A Gawande; E J Thomas; M J Zinner; T A Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Patient perspectives of patient-provider communication after adverse events.

Authors:  Christine W Duclos; Mary Eichler; Leslie Taylor; Javan Quintela; Deborah S Main; Wilson Pace; Elizabeth W Staton
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 10.  Complications of ERCP: ethical obligations and legal consequences.

Authors:  István Rácz; Stanislav Rejchrt; Majid Hassan
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.404

View more
  6 in total

1.  Upper Endoscopic Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome Detects Gastric and Duodenal Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Shria Kumar; Christina M Dudzik; Mallory Reed; Jessica M Long; Kirk J Wangensteen; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  A prospective study of patient safety incidents in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Manmeet Matharoo; Adam Haycock; Nick Sevdalis; Siwan Thomas-Gibson
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-17

3.  Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS).

Authors:  Sabina Beg; Krish Ragunath; Andrew Wyman; Matthew Banks; Nigel Trudgill; D Mark Pritchard; Stuart Riley; John Anderson; Helen Griffiths; Pradeep Bhandari; Phillip Kaye; Andrew Veitch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Shria Kumar; Natalie Farha; Carol A Burke; Bryson W Katona
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Safety, Efficacy and High-Quality Standards of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Procedures in Personalized Sedoanalgesia Managed by the Gastroenterologist: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Marina Rizzi; Francesco Panzera; Demetrio Panzera; Berardino D'Ascoli
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Patient safety management systems and activities related to promoting voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting for patient safety issues: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shigeru Fujita; Kanako Seto; Yosuke Hatakeyama; Ryo Onishi; Kunichika Matsumoto; Yoji Nagai; Shuhei Iida; Tomohiro Hirao; Junko Ayuzawa; Yoshiko Shimamori; Tomonori Hasegawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.