This article reports the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a novel class of molecules of intermediate size (approximately 7000 Da), which possess both the targeting and effector functions of antibodies. These compounds—called synthetic antibody mimics targeting prostate cancer (SyAM-Ps)—bind simultaneously to prostate-specific membrane antigen and Fc gamma receptor I, thus eliciting highly selective cancer cell phagocytosis. SyAMs have the potential to combine the advantages of both small-molecule and biologic therapies, and may address many drawbacks associated with available treatments for cancer and other diseases.
This article reports the design, synthesis, and evaluation of a novel class of molecules of intermediate size (approximately 7000 Da), which possess both the targeting and effector functions of antibodies. These compounds—called synthetic antibody mimics targeting prostate cancer (SyAM-Ps)—bind simultaneously to prostate-specific membrane antigen and Fc gamma receptor I, thus eliciting highly selective cancer cell phagocytosis. SyAMs have the potential to combine the advantages of both small-molecule and biologic therapies, and may address many drawbacks associated with available treatments for cancer and other diseases.
Targeted protein-based
therapeutics, or “biologics”,
have revolutionized cancer treatment during the past decade.[1,2] Agents in this class exert their actions selectively on pathological
cells, and include many varieties of monoclonal and bispecific antibodies.
Overall, biologics have exhibited high clinical success rates against
both hematologic and solid malignancies, as well as against non-neoplastic
diseases ranging from bacterial infection to autoimmune disease.[3]Monoclonal antibodies possess excellent
specificity and affinity
for cancer cell targets, and often function by hijacking native immune
effector mechanisms.[4] Bispecific antibodies,
diabodies, and other next-generation protein-based biologics specifically
target cell-surface markers on diseased cells and then activate receptors
on cytotoxic immune cells such as Fc gamma receptors (FcγRs)[5−8] and CD3.[9,10] Despite the many virtues of these biologics,
they suffer from limitations that relate primarily to their high molecular
weights and/or peptidic structures.[11,12] These potential
disadvantages include the possibility for life-threatening allergic
reactions, poor tissue penetration, immunogenicity (even for “humanized”
proteins),[13] lack of oral bioavailability,
requirement for low-temperature storage, difficulties in their large-scale
preparation, and high cost.[14]Here
we report novel synthetic molecules that possess both the
targeting and effector-cell-activating functions of antibodies, while
being less than 1/20th (5%) of their molecular weight. We term these
compounds nthetic ntibody imics (SyAMs, Figure 1A). The class
of SyAMs reported here—called SyAM-Ps—have been designed
to target prostate cancer cells. SyAM-Ps contain a glutamate-urea-based
targeting domain[15,16] that binds prostate-specific
membrane antigen (PSMA)—a cell surface protein that is highly
overexpressed on prostate cancer cells[17−19]—and an effector
domain that associates with the IgG receptor type I (FcγRI)—a
cell surface receptor found on immune cells responsible for initiating
pro-inflammatory responses against antibody-opsonized targets.[20−22] Notably, FcγRI activates immune cells to initiate phagocytosis
or release cytotoxic contents upon multivalent recognition of cell-surface-immobilized
ligand. In direct analogy to antibodies, SyAM-Ps induce the formation
of three-component complexes between effector and target cells, thus
leading to multivalent cross-linking and activation of Fc receptors,
followed by destruction of cancer cells (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Design and structures of synthetic antibody mimics targeting prostate
cancer (SyAM-Ps). (A) Schematic depiction of SyAM-P’s proposed
mechanism of action. (B) Docking of SyAM-P into PSMA binding pocket
and FcγRI binding surface to determine the linker length needed
to template a ternary complex. (C) Schematic illustration of the evolution
of SyAM-P’s design from a monoclonal antibody template. (D)
Molecules discussed herein. CP33 is an FcγRI-targeting motif.
The first-generation construct (SyAM-P1, 1) displays
single FcγRI- and PSMA-binding motifs linked with aminocaproic
units. The second-generation construct (SyAM-P2, 2) displays
a pair of PSMA-targeting motifs linked to a single CP33 motif. The
third-generation construct (SyAM-P3, 3) displays a pair
of PSMA-targeting motifs tethered to a pair of CP33 motifs.
Design and structures of synthetic antibody mimics targeting prostate
cancer (SyAM-Ps). (A) Schematic depiction of SyAM-P’s proposed
mechanism of action. (B) Docking of SyAM-P into PSMA binding pocket
and FcγRI binding surface to determine the linker length needed
to template a ternary complex. (C) Schematic illustration of the evolution
of SyAM-P’s design from a monoclonal antibody template. (D)
Molecules discussed herein. CP33 is an FcγRI-targeting motif.
The first-generation construct (SyAM-P1, 1) displays
single FcγRI- and PSMA-binding motifs linked with aminocaproic
units. The second-generation construct (SyAM-P2, 2) displays
a pair of PSMA-targeting motifs linked to a single CP33 motif. The
third-generation construct (SyAM-P3, 3) displays a pair
of PSMA-targeting motifs tethered to a pair of CP33 motifs.Although several examples of synthetic
or semi-synthetic molecules
capable of performing targeting or effector functions of antibodies
have appeared in the literature, these molecules mediate their effects
with the assistance of endogenous antibody proteins[5] or protein-based appendages,[23−25] or they lack immune
effector function altogether.[26−29] Also, while recombinant proteins with both targeting
and effector functions have been reported—including scFv molecules,[30−34] diabodies,[33] camelids,[34] and others—these molecules are very large (generally
>50 kDa) and likely to suffer from the limitations outlined above
for protein-based agents.The general strategy reported herein
has the potential to combine
the beneficial attributes of biologics while overcoming their most
significant disadvantages. Although SyAM-Ps still possess some of
the structural liabilities of biologics (i.e., they possess peptide
motifs), they are non-recombinant, readily prepared by organic synthesis,
and, due to their relatively small size (∼7 kDa), likely to
have favorable tumor penetration properties compared to high-molecular-weight
agents. We therefore believe that SyAMs have the potential to represent
a useful new direction for treating cancer and other diseases.[35,36]
Material and Methods
Docking of Protein and
SyAM Binding Partners
Crystal
structures were visually docked in the program Chimera to generate
a composite overlay, with approximate distances measured in Chimera.
For SyAM modeling, the linker was drawn in ChemDraw and docked into
PSMA and FcγRI using Chimera. As a comparison, the ARM-P8–PSMA
(PDB 2XEF) complex
was docked with IgG1 (PDB 1IGY) and FcγRIa (PDB 3RJD), also using Chimera (Supporting Information (SI), Figure S1).
Binding of
SyAMs to PSMA: Bead and Cell-Based Assays
PSMA-coated beads
were generated by incubating 6 μm streptavidin-labeled
polystyrene beads (Polysciences) with recombinant avi-tagged-PSMA
protein (kindly provided by Dr. Cyril Barinka and Dr. Jan Konvalinka)
for 30 min. Beads were washed twice with PBS, blocked with 1 mg/mL
biotin for 30 min, and then washed twice with TBS + 1.5% BSA. A total
of 105 PSMA-positive beads were incubated with SyAMs plus
Streptavidin-AlexaFluor 647 (Invitrogen; final concentration
3.3 μM). Samples were kept on ice for 30 min, washed twice,
and evaluated on an Accuri C6 flow cytometer. Cell-based assays were
performed under conditions identical to those described above, substituting
PSMA-positive LNCaP cells for beads.
Binding of SyAMs to FcγRI:
Cell-Based Assay
IIA1.6
cells, either stably transfected with FcγRIA/γ-chain or
non-transfected (isogenic negative control), were suspended in Assay
Media (phenol-free RPMI 1640 medium plus 10% ultra-low IgG FBS). A
total of 105 cells were mixed with the indicated compound
on ice. After a 1 h incubation on ice, 10 μg of streptavidin
conjugated to AlexaFluo 488 or AlexaFluo 647 was added.
After an additional hour, cells were washed three times with 1 mL
of cold Assay Media before flow cytometric analysis.
Ternary Complex
Binding Assay
Detection of FcγRI
Recruitment
LNCaPPSMA+ cells
were detached with enzyme-free detachment solution (0.5 mM EDTA and
EGTA) and resuspended in TBS + 1.5% BSA at a concentration of 2 ×
106 cells/mL. Next, 100 μL aliquots were dispensed
into Eppendorf tubes on ice. Incubation mixtures of 10 μL were
prepared; the small volume was used to maximize protein concentration.
These mixtures contained 1 μL of a desired concentration of 1 plus 5 μL of soluble recombinant FcγRI (R&D
Systems, 200 μg/mL) and 4 μL of an anti-FcγRI antibody
conjugated to phycoerythrin (R&D Systems). Eppendorf tubes with
LNCaP cells were spun down, and all supernatant was removed. The 10
μL incubation mixtures were transferred onto the cells, and
the pellet was resuspended gently. Incubations were left on ice for
1 h before washing 3 × 1 mL with TBS + 1.5% BSA.
Detection of
PSMA Recruitment
Experiments performed
were identical to those in the previous section describing the detection
of FcγRI recruitment, except that (1) FcγRI + IIa1.6
cells were substituted for LNCaPs, (2) soluble, recombinant his-tagged
PSMA (R&D Systems) was substituted for soluble recombinant FcγRI,
and (3) an anti-his antibody conjugated to phycoerythrin (R&D
Systems) was substituted for the anti-FcγRI antibody.
Measurement of PSMA Density on Target Surfaces
PSMA-positive
beads with a biotin loading capacity of 2.0 μg/mL were prepared
as described above. A phycoerythrin-labeled anti-PSMA antibody (Abcam)
was then added for 30 min on ice. After being washed two times with
PBS + 5% BSA, beads were analyzed for increased mean fluorescence
intensity by flow cytometry. PSMA expression on RM1.PGLS cells (obtained
from Dr. Michael Sadelain, MSKCC) was determined using staining conditions
identical to those used for the beads. R-Phycoerythrin Quantitation
beads from Bangs Laboratories were employed as calibration standards
in these assays, per the manufacturer’s instructions.
ROS Production
Assay
U937 cells were primed for 72
h with IFN-γ (final concentration 2 ng/mL; media changed daily).
A total of 3 × 105 cells/mL U937 cells in Assay Media
were mixed with 105 PSMA-coated beads/mL and SyAMs in a
96 well plate with a total volume of 90 μL. To each well, 10
μL of 2.5 mM lucigenin (Tokyo Chemicals) solution was added.
The plate was centrifuged at 200 rcf for 2 min. Chemiluminescence
was then measured every 2 min by plate reader (Biotek Synergy 2) for
60–90 min.
Compound Cytotoxicity Assay
A total
of 12 500
RM1-hPSMA cells (obtained from Dr. J. Mathis, LSU) were plated per
well in a volume of 100 μL of media (DMEM 4.5 g/L glucose +
10% FBS + 1% penicillin/streptomycin + 2 mM glutamine + 1
mM sodium pyruvate) on an Xcelligence E-Plate-16 (ACEA Biosciences)
36 h before the start of the experiment. One hundred microliters of
media per well without cells was used to obtain background cell index
readings on the E-Plate 16. Adherence and growth of the cells were
monitored by obtaining cell index readings every 15 min using the
Xcelligence system (model RTCA-DP, ACEA Biosciences), maintained inside
an incubator (37 °C, 5% CO2). At time 0, the old media
was carefully aspirated from the E-Plate, and fresh media containing
various concentrations of SyAM-P3, vehicle only (1% DMSO; negative
control), or 3% Triton detergent (positive control) was added to the
wells. The plate was returned to the Xcelligence port, and cell index
readings were obtained every 2 min for 3 h and then every 10 min for
the remaining 21 h.
Bead and Cell Phagocytosis Assay
IFN-γ-primed
U937 cells were stained with DiD dye (final concentration 1.9 μM)
for 30 min at 37 °C. PSMA-positive beads were prepared as described
above using 6 μm FL-1 fluorescent beads modified with an AlexaFluor 488
derivative (Streptavidin Fluoresbrite YG Microspheres, Polysciences).
RM1.PGLS target cells were prepared by staining adherent cells with
DiO dye (Invitrogen; final concentration 1.9 μM), and then non-enzymatically
detaching the cells with 0.5 mM EDTA and EGTA. Cells were counted
with trypan blue staining to verify cell viability. To measure phagocytosis,
we combined 4 × 104 beads or 1.25 × 104 target cells with 105 U937 cells in Assay Media, either
in the presence or absence of molecule, as indicated (final volume
100 μL). This experimental setup yielded effector-to-target
ratios (E:T ratios) of 2.5:1 and 8:1 for bead and cell targets, respectively.
Eppendorf tubes were centrifuged at 200 rcf for 2 min and then incubated
at 37 °C for 1 h. Phagocytosis was halted by placing the tubes
on ice. Flow cytometric measurements were then made using an Accuri
C6 flow cytometer. For data presented in Figure 3 (below), percent phagocytosis was calculated by the formula % targets
phagocytosed = [(double-positive cells)/(remaining target cells +
double-positive cells) × 100%] – background phagocytosis.
Data presented in the Supporting Information were also processed via two alternate formulas, as indicated: (1)
% effectors phagocytosing = [(double-positive cells)/(non-participating
effectors + double-positive cells) × 100%] – background
phagocytosis,[37] and (2) phagocytic score
= (% effectors phagocytosing × mean fluorescence intensity of
phagocytosing effectors) – background phagocytic score.[38] Background phagocytosis is defined as phagocytosis
measured in the absence of compound. For confirmation of the viability
of cells analyzed as shown in SI, Figure S10, propidium iodide (2 μg/mL final concentration) was added
to samples while on ice after 1 h of phagocytosis.
Figure 3
Functional assays using SyAM-P2 and SyAM-P3. (A) Superoxide burst
assays. Primed FcγRI-expressing U937 effector cells and PSMA-coated
beads were incubated in the presence of 2 and 3 at the indicated concentrations, and peak superoxide burst was measured
as a function of reaction with the chemiluminescent compound lucigenin.
(B) Phagocytosis of PSMA-labeled beads by primed FcγRI-expressing
effector cells was measured using flow cytometry following exposure
to the indicated concentrations of 1, 2,
or 3. Phagocytosis was calculated as % target cells phagocytosed,
with background phagocytosis in the absence of compound subtracted.
(C) Cellular phagocytosis assays. Phagocytosis of PSMA-positive cells
by FcγRI-expressing U937 effector cells was measured using flow
cytometry following exposure to the indicated concentrations of 3, in the presence or absence of inhibitors, as shown. The
left y-axis reports % targets phagocytosed = [(double-positive
cells)/(remaining target cells + double-positive cells) × 100%]
– background phagocytosis in the absence of compound, as measured
by conventional flow cytometry. The right y-axis
reports phagocytic events on a separate day analyzed by Amnis Imagestream
flow cytometry. For Amnis experiments, double positives were calculated
from dot-plot analyses of all events, as with conventional FACS. Double
positive events with corresponding in-focus images were further evaluated
for initiated (formation of a phagocytic cup) or completed phagocytosis.
Calculations for each event type can be found in SI, Table S3. Data points shown in panels A–C represent
the mean of at least duplicate experiments plus/minus standard deviation,
and the reported trends were reproduced on at least three separate
occasions. P-values represent the probabilities that
pairwise differences in mean values (no compound versus the indicated
concentration of SyAM-P3) could have arisen by chance alone, as determined
by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test.
****, P < 0.0001. (D) Amnis flow cytometry imaging
of phagocytic events. Depicted are representative images of completed
phagocytosis as compared to phagocytic cup formation. Channels shown
are brightfield, target (stained with DiO), nuclei (stained with Hoechst),
effector cell (stained with DiD, anti-CD14-APC, and anti-CD11b-APC),
and merged image.
Amnis Imagestream
Imaging
Phagocytosis experiments
were conducted as described above, and then cells were fixed in 3%
formaldehyde for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed once in PBS, and
then stained with anti-CD14-APC and anti-CD11b-APC antibodies (Biolegend)
plus Hoechst dye (Invitrogen) for 30 min on ice. Addition of the APC-conjugated
antibodies was found to be necessary after fixation reduced the fluorescence
of the DiD membrane dye; CD14 and CD11b are monocyte surface markers
commonly used in flow cytometric phagocytosis assays.[39−41] The cells were washed once in PBS and then analyzed on an Amnis
Imagestream X flow cytometer, where images and data for 30 000
events/sample were collected. Data were analyzed using Amnis IDEAS
software. Double-positive events were manually scored for phagocytic
cup formation or complete engulfment of the target.
Results and Discussion
In constructing SyAM-Ps, we first identified chemical motifs capable
of occupying the targeting and effector domains. Several small-molecule
ligands—including 2-PMPA and the glutamate ureas—have
been developed that bind PSMA selectively and with high affinity.[15,16,42] Glutamate-ureas have also been
used to image PSMA-positive tumors in mice, with low background in
normal tissues, which express the highly homologous murinePSMA protein.[43,44] Our laboratory has utilized these ligands to develop antibody-recruiting
molecules (termed ARMs) directed against prostate cancer (ARM-P8).
ARM-P8 has been shown to bind PSMA, recruit endogenous anti-dinitrophenyl
(anti-DNP) antibodies to cancer cell surfaces, and then induce immune-mediated
cytotoxic responses.[45] We incorporated
the PSMA-binding glutamate urea motif of ARMs into SyAM-Ps (Figure 1D). Conversely, for immune-cell targeting, we chose
the CP33 cyclic peptide. CP33 was discovered using phage display screening,
and has demonstrated highly selective binding to FcγRI over
other FcγR subtypes.[46]In constructing
our first-generation synthetic antibody mimic (SyAM-P1, 1), we began by modeling its ternary complex with target and
effector proteins. We combined co-crystal structures of the ARM-P8–PSMA
complex (PDB 2XEF)[47] with a docked structure of the CP33–FcγRI
complex (PDB 3RJD),[48] to design a linker domain with sufficient
length, solubility, and rigidity to enable simultaneous binding of
targeting and effector termini to their respective protein targets,
and also to prevent steric clashes between components (Figure 1B). Interestingly, these measurements predicted
that SyAMs should be able to function adequately at lengths significantly
shorter than those separating antigen-binding (Fab) and FcγR-binding
(Fc) domains in antibodies, in part due to the superficial location
of the predicted CP33 binding site on FcγRI. Whereas Fab and
Fc domains in antibodies are separated by approximately 140 Å
(Figure 1C; SI, Figure
S1), our modeling studies suggested that flexible, linear functionality
approximately 22 Å in length could connect the hydrophobic interior
of PSMA to bulk solvent, while access to the ligand binding surface
of FcγRI would require an additional 20 Å. Overall, we
therefore estimated that a linker of approximately 40 Å in length
would be required to enable efficient ternary complex formation in
SyAM-Ps. Translating these distance estimates into a molecular construct
led us to choose a series of aminocaproic acid spacers to separate
the PSMA- and FcγRI-binding functionality in SyAM-P1 (Figure 1D).Access to SyAM-P1 (1) was
achieved through a straightforward,
convergent synthetic sequence starting with known azide 4(45) (Scheme 1).
This compound was employed as a substrate in a Sharpless–Meldal
modified Huisgen [3+2] cycloaddition, or “click” reaction,[49−51] to afford carboxylic acid 5. This product was then
subjected to a four-step protocol for coupling to the linker and CP33
fragments. This sequence involved acylation of resin-bound intermediate 6 (derived from 7, synthesized entirely using
Fmoc solid-phase peptide protocols), Fmoc deprotection, resin cleavage
and global deprotection, and air oxidation to afford SyAM-P1 in 1.1%
yield over four steps. Notably, SyAM-P1 also contains a biotin motif
to enable orthogonal tracking of the conjugate during cellular experiments.
Scheme 1
With SyAM-P1 in hand, we first explored the compound’s
ability
to interact with cells expressing either FcγRI (IIA1.6-FcγRI)
or PSMA (LNCaP). Thus, SyAM-P1 was incubated with the indicated cell
type, and binding was monitored using flow cytometry, detecting with
a fluorescently labeled streptavidin conjugate. These experiments
demonstrated concentration-dependent association of SyAM-P1 with both
FcγRI- and PSMA-expressing cells (Figure 2A,B; SI, Figure S2B). No binding was observed
between SyAM-P1 and a control cell line that does not express either
FcγRI or PSMA up to 10 μM (SI, Figure
S2A). These data indicate that SyAM-P1 is capable of binding
to FcγRI and PSMA in cellular contexts.
Figure 2
Binding and functional
properties of SyAM-P1 (1).
(A) SyAM-P1 binds FcγRI-expressing cells in a concentration-dependent
manner. Binding was measured by probing with fluorescently labeled
streptavidin, which associates with the biotin function in 1. (B) SyAM-P1 binds PSMA-expressing cells in a concentration-dependent
manner. Binding was measured by probing with fluorescently labeled
streptavidin, which associates with the biotin function in 1. (C) Ternary complex formation between 1, PSMA-positive
LNCaP cells, and soluble recombinant FcγRI, probing with a fluorescent
anti-FcγRI antibody. (D) Ternary complex formation between 1, FcγRI-positive cells, and soluble recombinant human
PSMA (his-tagged), probing with an anti-his antibody. (E) Superoxide
burst generation from primed FcγRI-positive cells, induced by 1 bound to PSMA-labeled beads. Superoxides were detected by
their reactivity with the chemiluminescent compound lucigenin. Peak
luminescence generated during an 80 min time course is shown. (F)
Phagocytosis of fluorescent PSMA-labeled beads by primed FcγRI-positive
cells induced by compound 1. Phagocytosis was calculated
as percent of targets phagocytosed minus background phagocytosis with
0 nM compound. (G) Effect of PSMA density on target cells on SyAM-P1-induced
phagocytic response. The red dot indicates the PSMA level measured
on RM1.PGLS cells, while black dots indicate PSMA level on labeled
beads. All data points reflect the phagocytic response induced using
a 50 nM concentration of SyAM-P1. The x-intercept
was determined to be 606 PSMA/μm2 by linear regression
analysis using Prism 5 (GraphPad). For functional assays in panels
E and F, data points represent the mean of at least duplicate samples
plus/minus standard deviation, and the reported trends were reproduced
on at least three separate occasions.
Binding and functional
properties of SyAM-P1 (1).
(A) SyAM-P1 binds FcγRI-expressing cells in a concentration-dependent
manner. Binding was measured by probing with fluorescently labeled
streptavidin, which associates with the biotin function in 1. (B) SyAM-P1 binds PSMA-expressing cells in a concentration-dependent
manner. Binding was measured by probing with fluorescently labeled
streptavidin, which associates with the biotin function in 1. (C) Ternary complex formation between 1, PSMA-positive
LNCaP cells, and soluble recombinant FcγRI, probing with a fluorescent
anti-FcγRI antibody. (D) Ternary complex formation between 1, FcγRI-positive cells, and soluble recombinant humanPSMA (his-tagged), probing with an anti-his antibody. (E) Superoxide
burst generation from primed FcγRI-positive cells, induced by 1 bound to PSMA-labeled beads. Superoxides were detected by
their reactivity with the chemiluminescent compound lucigenin. Peak
luminescence generated during an 80 min time course is shown. (F)
Phagocytosis of fluorescent PSMA-labeled beads by primed FcγRI-positive
cells induced by compound 1. Phagocytosis was calculated
as percent of targets phagocytosed minus background phagocytosis with
0 nM compound. (G) Effect of PSMA density on target cells on SyAM-P1-induced
phagocytic response. The red dot indicates the PSMA level measured
on RM1.PGLS cells, while black dots indicate PSMA level on labeled
beads. All data points reflect the phagocytic response induced using
a 50 nM concentration of SyAM-P1. The x-intercept
was determined to be 606 PSMA/μm2 by linear regression
analysis using Prism 5 (GraphPad). For functional assays in panels
E and F, data points represent the mean of at least duplicate samples
plus/minus standard deviation, and the reported trends were reproduced
on at least three separate occasions.We next performed several additional flow cytometry-based
binding
experiments to evaluate SyAM-P1’s capacity to form ternary
complexes at both targeting and effector termini. Thus, we incubated
PSMA-expressing cancer cells (LNCaP cells) with 1 and
soluble FcγRI in the presence of a fluorescently labeled anti-FcγRI
antibody probe. Increases in fluorescence were observed only in the
presence of SyAM-P1 (Figure 2C, red and purple
curves), indicative of the molecule’s ability to recruit soluble
FcγRI in a concentration-dependent fashion. Conversely, exposure
of 1 to FcγRI-expressing cells, followed by detection
with soluble his-tagged PSMA and a fluorescent anti-his antibody,
demonstrated a significant increase in mean fluorescence intensity
only for FcγRI-positive cells incubated with both 1 and soluble PSMA (Figure 2D, orange curve).
No fluorescence increase was observed in the absence of 1 (green curve) or soluble PSMA (gray curve). Taken together, these
data indicate that SyAM-P1 (1) is capable of interacting
with both cellular FcγRI and PSMA simultaneously, thus validating
our proposed structural model.We next evaluated whether SyAM-P1
(1) could induce
effector responses from FcγRI-positive immune cells. In these
assays, U937 cells were first primed with IFN-γ, which induces
an up-regulation of FcγRI (SI, Figure S2C,D), and stimulates pro-inflammatory responses.[52] SyAM-P1 exhibited high-level binding to IFN-γ-primed
U937 cells in a concentration-dependent fashion (SI, Figure S2F). Only very low levels of binding to unprimed
cells were detected (SI, Figure S2E), consistent
with low basal levels of FcγRI expression on these cells (SI, Figure S2C). SyAM-P1 (1) was
also found to elicit robust, target-dependent responses in superoxide
burst experiments (Figure 2E), as assessed
with a ROS-sensitive chemiluminescent probe.[53] PSMA-coated beads were chosen as targets in these experiments because
they enabled tight control over PSMA density. In experiments performed
in the absence of target beads altogether, SyAM-P1 failed to induce
ROS production, indicating that multivalent templating on PSMA-expressing
surfaces is required for compound function (SI,
Figure S2G).Finally, we analyzed SyAM-P1-dependent phagocytic
responses of
primed U937 monocytic cells against PSMA-coated beads using a two-color
flow cytometry assay.[54] In this system,
SyAM-P1 (1) was found to enhance both the phagocytosis
of PSMA-coated beads (Figure 2F) and the phagocytic
activity of U937 effector cells (SI, Figure S3F,G) in a dose-dependent manner. All of these metrics yielded EC50 values for SyAM-P1 of approximately 20–30 nM (Figure 2F; SI, Figure S3F,G).
Internalization of PSMA-coated beads by U937 effector cells was confirmed
by fluorescence quenching of non-internalized beads (SI, Figure S3A–C) and by microscopy (SI, Figure S3D,E). These effector responses were abrogated
by either a competitive small-molecule ligand to PSMA (2-PMPA)[15] or an anti-FcγRI antibody (Figure 2F; SI, Figure S3F,G).
Unprimed U937 cells were unable to mediate phagocytosis (SI, Figure S2H), as expected from their low FcγRI
expression (SI, Figure S2C). Follow-up
experiments indicated that PSMA loading density directly correlates
with phagocytic responses (Figure 2G; SI, Table S2). Robust effector responses were
observed at PSMA densities ranging from 840 ± 88 to 2375 ±
250 molecules per μm2. These results establish a
minimal PSMA density necessary for SyAM-P1 to elicit an immune response,
and a linear dependence on the level of phagocytosis with PSMA densities
above that threshold. Together these data indicate that SyAM-P1 is
capable of mediating immunological responses—including both
superoxide burst and phagocytosis—in a PSMA- and FcγRI-specific
manner. More broadly, these proof-of-principle studies also provide
essential support for the hypothesis that both targeting and effector
responses of an antibody can be effectively mimicked in vitro by a fully synthetic bifunctional molecule.Although initial
studies with SyAM-P1 (1) were encouraging,
attempts to repeat phagocytosis results using PSMA-expressing cancer
cells in lieu of PSMA-labeled beads were unsuccessful (SI, Figure S4D). Because PSMA expression levels
on RM1.PGLS cells were measured to be 720 ± 139 molecules per
μm2, below the threshold observed in Figure 2G, we hypothesized that this low level of PSMA expression
on the surface of target cells was insufficient to enable SyAM-P1
(1)-mediated immune responses.We therefore pursued
a second-generation strategy. We hypothesized
that a bivalent display of PSMA-binding motifs would increase the
degree of SyAM-P binding to PSMA at equilibrium, in a manner analogous
to IgG avidity.[55] This analysis led to
the design of SyAM-P2 (Figure 1D, 2), which we were able to synthesize using a straightforward convergent
sequence. As illustrated in Scheme 2, azide 4 was converted to the corresponding triazole through a microwave-assisted
[3+2] cycloaddition with propargylamine, and the resulting amine was
acylated with an aminocaproic acid-derived spacer. The resulting adduct
(9) was then Fmoc deprotected to afford amine 10, and dimerized using an azido arene template (11, Scheme 2B) to 12. Compound 12 served
as a substrate for a second [3+2] cycloaddition, and the resulting
intermediate carboxylic acid was then readily converted to SyAM-P2
(2) through a low-yielding sequence involving NHS-ester
formation, global deprotection, and acylation with CP33-containing
amine 14 (Scheme 2C).
Scheme 2
With SyAM-P2 (2) in hand, we next evaluated
its ability
to bind PSMA and FcγRI targets and induce phagocytosis. Although
SyAM-P2 was found to bind PSMA somewhat more potently than SyAM-P1
(Kd values of 26 and 40 nM, respectively, SI, Table S1), and also to induce a much greater
level of phagocytosis against PSMA-coated bead targets (SI, Figure S4C), it proved no better in cellular
phagocytosis assays than its predecessor (1, SI, Figure S4D,E). We therefore developed several
additional analogues of SyAM-P2, using chemistry similar to that shown
in Scheme 2, to probe the effects of linker
length and composition. Thus, two SyAM-P2 analogues containing PEG-based
linkers (S.7 and S.8, SI, Supplementary Scheme 2), as well as one additional analogue
containing a shorter aminocaproic acid-based linker (S.13, SI, Supplementary Scheme 4), were synthesized
and evaluated using both binding and phagocytosis assays described
above (SI, Figure S4A,B). However, none
of these additional derivatives exhibited greater potency or phagocytic
ability compared to SyAM-P2 (2).We therefore shifted
our optimization efforts to the FcγRI-binding
domain in SyAM-P constructs. Based on a mathematical model for three-component
equilibria recently developed in our laboratory,[55] we hypothesized that increasing the number of FcγRI-ligating
motifs would enhance both the potency and efficacy of SyAM-P molecules
in eliciting targeted immune responses (SI, Figure
S5). We therefore designed a bis-bivalent SyAM-P derivative
called SyAM-P3 (Figure 1D, 3).
Synthesis of 3 was accomplished starting from bis-functionalized
azide 12 (Scheme 3). This material
was coupled with diamine 16 using a microwave-assisted
[3+2] cycloaddition reaction, and then these amines were acylated
with CP33-containing NHS-ester 15 (derived as shown in
Scheme 2C from intermediate 14) to provide SyAM-P3 in acceptable yield. Once again, linker lengths
were chosen in accordance with the coarse-grained modeling studies
presented in Figure 1B.
Scheme 3
Although we were aware
that bivalent presentation of CP33 had the
potential to elicit target-independent activation of immune cells,
we speculated that such effects could be minimized, or completely
avoided, as long as the efficacious therapeutic concentration was
significantly lower than that needed to induce target-independent
activation. In such a scenario, a derivative such as 3 would improve the Kd for the FcγRI–ligand
interaction as a consequence of avidity, but require binding to targets
displaying a sufficient PSMA density to activate immune effectors
cell responses.In the event, SyAM-P3 (3) was found
to be both more
potent and more efficacious than earlier-generation molecules in oxidative
burst and phagocytosis assays using PSMA-coated beads as targets and
varying E:T ratios (Figure 3A,B). Control experiments demonstrated that the oxidative
burst responses required the presence of PSMA-labeled beads (SI, Figure S6A), indicating that direct cross-linking
of FcγRI by SyAM-P3 (3) was not taking place under
these experimental conditions, despite the presence of bivalent CP33
motifs in SyAM-P3 (3). This observation is consistent
with prior reports demonstrating that very high concentrations of
soluble bivalent-CP33 (10 mM or greater)—approximately 1000-fold
higher than what is required for SyAM-P3’s activity (Figure 3A; SI, Figure S6A)—are
required to activate effector cells in the absence of targets.[46] SyAM-mediated phagocytosis of PSMA-coated beads
was significant at varying E:T ratios from the perspective of both
the targets phagocytosed (Figure 3B; SI, Figure S7E) and the engagement of effector
cells (SI, Figure S7A–D). Phagocytic
responses were suppressed in a concentration-dependent manner in the
presence of either human IgG or 2-PMPA (SI, Figure
S6B,C), confirming that observed levels of phagocytosis require
both Fc-receptor- and PSMA-binding interactions with SyAM-P3 (3).Functional assays using SyAM-P2 and SyAM-P3. (A) Superoxide burst
assays. Primed FcγRI-expressing U937 effector cells and PSMA-coated
beads were incubated in the presence of 2 and 3 at the indicated concentrations, and peak superoxide burst was measured
as a function of reaction with the chemiluminescent compound lucigenin.
(B) Phagocytosis of PSMA-labeled beads by primed FcγRI-expressing
effector cells was measured using flow cytometry following exposure
to the indicated concentrations of 1, 2,
or 3. Phagocytosis was calculated as % target cells phagocytosed,
with background phagocytosis in the absence of compound subtracted.
(C) Cellular phagocytosis assays. Phagocytosis of PSMA-positive cells
by FcγRI-expressing U937 effector cells was measured using flow
cytometry following exposure to the indicated concentrations of 3, in the presence or absence of inhibitors, as shown. The
left y-axis reports % targets phagocytosed = [(double-positive
cells)/(remaining target cells + double-positive cells) × 100%]
– background phagocytosis in the absence of compound, as measured
by conventional flow cytometry. The right y-axis
reports phagocytic events on a separate day analyzed by Amnis Imagestream
flow cytometry. For Amnis experiments, double positives were calculated
from dot-plot analyses of all events, as with conventional FACS. Double
positive events with corresponding in-focus images were further evaluated
for initiated (formation of a phagocytic cup) or completed phagocytosis.
Calculations for each event type can be found in SI, Table S3. Data points shown in panels A–C represent
the mean of at least duplicate experiments plus/minus standard deviation,
and the reported trends were reproduced on at least three separate
occasions. P-values represent the probabilities that
pairwise differences in mean values (no compound versus the indicated
concentration of SyAM-P3) could have arisen by chance alone, as determined
by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test.
****, P < 0.0001. (D) Amnis flow cytometry imaging
of phagocytic events. Depicted are representative images of completed
phagocytosis as compared to phagocytic cup formation. Channels shown
are brightfield, target (stained with DiO), nuclei (stained with Hoechst),
effector cell (stained with DiD, anti-CD14-APC, and anti-CD11b-APC),
and merged image.As expected, SyAM-Ps 1, 2, and 3 all exhibit autoinhibitory
dose–response curves in
bead-based phagocytosis assays (Figure 3B).
Fitting these data to a mathematical model for ternary equilibria
has allowed us to gain several mechanistic insights into the modes
of action and differential activities of SyAM derivatives.[55] For example, the high quality of the model fit
strongly supports that SyAMs act via a three-component pre-equilibrium,
in which formation of the underlying FcγR-SyAM-PSMA complex
occurs significantly faster than the induced effector response. The
mathematical model also explains why making the FcγRI-targeting
side of SyAM-Ps bivalent (2 → 3,
blue versus red curves) leads to a greater change in phagocytosis
than does the analogous modification to the PSMA-binding side (1 → 2, black versus blue curves). This
rationale can be understood in terms of the increases in interaction
strength that accompanies bivalency. For systems such as the SyAM-Ps,
in which Kds corresponding to each end
of the complex differ from each other by more than 10-fold, and are
larger in value than the corresponding cell-surface receptor concentrations,
our model predicts that improvements in the weaker Kd (here KFcγRI) will
enhance both the magnitude (i.e., maximum phagocytosis) and width
of dose–response curves. Improving the stronger binding constant
(here KPSMA), on the other hand, only
affects the width of these curves. Finally, the “zippering”
effect between the immune and cancer surfaces leads to positive cooperativity,
which also emerges when these curves are fit to our mathematical model.
Similar cooperativity trends have previously been observed for antibody-dependent
cytotoxicity.[56]In the final set
of experiments, we monitored SyAM-P3-induced phagocytosis
of PSMA-expressing RM1.PGLS cells by FcγRI-expressing U937 monocytic
cells (Figure 3C; SI, Figure
S8A). As shown, treatment of RM1.PGLS cells with varying concentrations
of SyAM-P3 led to significant levels of target cell phagocytosis,
over a range of E:T ratios (from 2:1 to 20:1; SI, Figure S11A–C,E). Phagocytosis was dependent on
SyAM-P3 concentration, and autoinhibitory at higher concentrations,
as predicted by mathematical models. Phagocytosis was suppressed in
the presence of either human IgG or 2-PMPA, which are known competitors
at FcγRI and PSMA, respectively (Figure 3C; SI, Figures S6E,F and S11D). Furthermore,
treatment of the isogenic PSMA-negative RM1 tumor line with SyAM-P3
led to only minimal levels of phagocytosis (SI,
Figure S6D). Taken together, these data indicate that SyAM-P3
is inducing phagocytosis in a manner that depends on the presence
of PSMA and FcγRI on target and effector cells, respecitvely.
Additional control experiments were also performed, which confirmed
the viability of phagocytosed targets (SI, Figure
S10A–F), as well as that SyAM-P3 is non-cytotoxic in
the absence of effector cells (SI, Figure S9). Furthermore, direct head-to-head comparison of SyAM-P3 derivative S.18 and ARM-P8 plus anti-DNP antibody demonstrates comparable
levels of phagocytic activity (SI, Figure S6G). Compound S.18 is somewhat more potent than ARM-P8,
whereas the latter compound gives rise to slightly higher maximal
levels of phagocytosis, perhaps due to the ability of the anti-DNP
antibody to engage FcγRs other than FcγRI.SyAM-induced
phagocytosis was then visualized using an Amnis imaging
flow cytometer (Figure 3D; SI, Figure S8B). Here effector and target cells were exposed
to SyAM-P3, and 30 000 epifluorescence images were obtained
for each set of experimental conditions. These experiments allowed
us to image double-positive cellular clusters, which fell into three
categories—cell–cell attachment (red), phagocytic cup
formation (blue), and complete target cell engulfment (green, Figure 3C, right axis)—which reflect early, intermediate,
and late stages of the phagocytic process, respectively (calculation
of percentages can be found in SI, Table S3). Careful analysis of these high-throughput microscopy data revealed
that the percentages of cells in the various phagocytic stages were
well-correlated between SyAM-P3 (3) and the positive
control of ARM-P8 (SI, Table S3). Also,
among cell complexes engaged in phagocytic cup formation, effector
cells routinely exhibited surface invagination at the site of cell–cell
contact. Such morphological changes were not observed among target
cells, consistent with the expectation that double-positive readings
result from engulfment of PSMA-expressing cells by FcγRI-positive
cells, not vice versa.
Conclusions
Here we report the first
homogeneous, synthetic molecules capable
of mimicking the ability of antibodies to target FcγR-dependent
immune effector responses selectively to cancer cells. These molecules
are completely synthetic, and possess much lower molecular weights
than protein-containing agents. Our findings offer insight into the
structural parameters required for the design of functional synthetic
antibodies, and indicate that the Fc receptor and target proteins
can be brought into close enough proximity to enable immune response
activation, even when effector and targeting domains are much closer
together than in Fc-antibody-target complexes. Furthermore, the improvement
in efficacy seen in compound 3 establishes the importance
of avidity in mediating immune effector responses. Although a bivalent
targeting domain (as seen in 2) mimics the natural F(ab)2 structure, the linking of a pair of FcγRI binding motifs
in 3 affords an even larger improvement in efficacy without
inducing target-independent immune cell activation.Although
not explicitly addressed in this report, we believe that
the SyAM strategy has the potential to combine many of the advantageous
properties of small-molecule and biologic therapies while overcoming
some of the drawbacks seen with protein-based agents. For example,
even the largest of the proposed SyAMs is only approximately 5% of
the molecular weight of an antibody, and thus SyAMs have the potential
to penetrate into solid tumors more efficiently than antibodies. Although
SyAMs contain a peptidic component, due to its relatively small size,
along with its cyclic nature and N-terminal acetylation,
this motif is highly unlikely to be processed and presented on MHC
proteins, and to induce unwanted “anti-SyAM” immune
responses. Because of the modular nature of SyAMs, one can imagine
incorporating entirely non-peptidic functionality for activating immune
cells in next-generation SyAMs. SyAMs also offer a potential advantage
over our previously reported antibody-recruiting molecules, in that
they are capable of eliciting immune responses by direct binding to
immune cell receptors, removing the need for endogenous antibodies,
whose concentrations and/or affinities can vary among individuals.[45,57] Like antibodies, SyAMs are expected to enhance trafficking of cancer-specific
antigens through immune cells, and thus have the potential to give
rise to long-lasting immunity.[4,58−61] Therefore, SyAMs have the potential to serve simultaneously as treatment
and vaccine.Unlike many conventional small molecules, SyAM
constructs will
require neither cell permeability nor the ability to interfere with
protein–ligand interactions in order to recruit immune cells
and function effectively as cytotoxic agents. In analogy to antibodies,[62] SyAMs can function through a mechanism that
affords multiple levels of regulation: synthetic constructs are expected
only to induce cell killing upon binding cancer cells in sufficiently
large amounts to initiate FcγRI cross-linking and activate immune
effector responses. Because both humanprostate cancer cells and tumor
neovasculature express PSMA at extremely high levels,[63−67] SyAMs are expected to exhibit excellent selectivity for a range
of cancer-relevant targets. This behavior stands in contrast to many
traditional chemotherapeutics or toxin conjugates, which can kill
“off-target” cells due to either non-specific uptake
of lethal toxins or low levels of target antigen expression.[68] Unlike antibodies, which bind both activating
and inhibitory FcγRs,[69,70] SyAMs selectively bind
to only FcγRI, whose primary role is to activate immune-mediated
cytotoxicity.[20,21] This property would also avoid
the deposition of complement, which has been shown to impair Fc responses in vivo.[71] In theory, the convergent
synthesis reported herein will enable rapid modification, and therefore
allow for application of this strategy against a wide variety of disease-associated
cells, viruses,[57] or proteins, thus broadening
the scope and the utility of our approach. These molecules provide
new and exciting avenues for development of next-generation, customizable
immunotherapeutics.
Authors: B S Slusher; J J Vornov; A G Thomas; P D Hurn; I Harukuni; A Bhardwaj; R J Traystman; M B Robinson; P Britton; X C Lu; F C Tortella; K M Wozniak; M Yudkoff; B M Potter; P F Jackson Journal: Nat Med Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Eugene F Douglass; Chad J Miller; Gerson Sparer; Harold Shapiro; David A Spiegel Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Venkata R Doppalapudi; Jie Huang; Dingguo Liu; Ping Jin; Bin Liu; Lingna Li; Joel Desharnais; Crystal Hagen; Nancy J Levin; Michael J Shields; Michelle Parish; Robert E Murphy; Joselyn Del Rosario; Bryan D Oates; Jing-Yu Lai; Marla J Matin; Zemeda Ainekulu; Abhijit Bhat; Curt W Bradshaw; Gary Woodnutt; Richard A Lerner; Rodney W Lappe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Juyao Dong; Michael A Lee; Ananth Govind Rajan; Imon Rahaman; Jessica H Sun; Minkyung Park; Daniel P Salem; Michael S Strano Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jiaying Liu; Randall Toy; Casey Vantucci; Pallab Pradhan; Zijian Zhang; Katie M Kuo; Kelsey P Kubelick; Da Huo; Jianguo Wen; Jinhwan Kim; Zhiheng Lyu; Simran Dhal; Alexandra Atalis; Shohini K Ghosh-Choudhary; Emily J Devereaux; James C Gumbart; Younan Xia; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Nick J Willett; Krishnendu Roy Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Pavel Šácha; Tomáš Knedlík; Jiří Schimer; Jan Tykvart; Jan Parolek; Václav Navrátil; Petra Dvořáková; František Sedlák; Karel Ulbrich; Jiří Strohalm; Pavel Majer; Vladimír Šubr; Jan Konvalinka Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Manuel Brehs; André J G Pötgens; Julia Steitz; Karine Thewes; Janett Schwarz; Anne C Conibear; Matthias Bartneck; Frank Tacke; Christian F W Becker Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Heike Endepols; Felix M Mottaghy; Sakine Simsekyilmaz; Jan Bucerius; Felix Vogt; Oliver Winz; Raphael Richarz; Philipp Krapf; Bernd Neumaier; Boris D Zlatopolskiy; Agnieszka Morgenroth Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 4.379