Literature DB >> 25510627

[Reduction of intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude during general anesthesia].

H Zuche1, E Morinello2, A Viestenz3, M Fiorentzis3, B Seitz3, T Volk2, A Viestenz3.   

Abstract

AIM: Measurement of the intraocular pressure (IOP) is an important tool for glaucoma diagnostics in children or patients with impaired cooperation. General anesthesia (GA) may significantly influence the IOP. This study aimed to evaluate the reduction of IOP during GA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IOP was measured in 229 patients in a recumbent position in the non-operated eye prior to and 5 min after the beginning of GA with a dynamic contour tonometer (DCT).
RESULTS: The average IOP decreased from 19.9 ± 3.7 mmHg prior to GA to 14.1 ± 3.5 mmHg 5 min after beginning GA (p < 0.0001, IOP decrease 30 %). The GA caused a decrease of up to 2 mmHg in 6.1 %, 2-4 mmHg in 18.8 %, 4-6 mmHg in 21.0 %, 6-8 mmHg in 36.6 %, 8-10 mmHg in 13.6 %, 10-12 mmHg in 2.2 % and more than 12 mmHg in 1.7 % of the eyes. The ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) decreased from a mean of 3.4 ± 1.5 mmHg to 1.9 ± 1.0 mmHg (p < 0.0001, OPA decrease 41 %) under GA.
CONCLUSION: A significant decrease of IOP (mean 6 mmHg) occurs during GA and under extreme conditions up to 13.8 mmHg. A decrease of OPA of 1.5 mmHg should be taken into consideration for patients under general anesthesia and under extreme conditions up to 7 mmHg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Diagnosis; Dynamic contour tonometer; Glaucoma; Ophthalmological examination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25510627     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-014-3180-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  16 in total

1.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Wanqing Jin; Qinmei Wang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) - a comparison of agreement and reproducibility.

Authors:  Sonja Herdener; Mona Pache; Sonja Lautebach; Jens Funk
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].

Authors:  A Viestenz; A Langenbucher; A Viestenz
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  Hand-held dynamic contour tonometry.

Authors:  Pascal B Knecht; Ursina Schmid; Timo Romppainen; Annette Hediger; Jens Funk; Hartmut Kanngiesser; Christoph Kniestedt
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 5.  Glaucoma.

Authors:  A L Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: a multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe.

Authors:  C E Traverso; J G Walt; S P Kelly; A H Hommer; A M Bron; P Denis; J-P Nordmann; J-P Renard; A Bayer; F Grehn; N Pfeiffer; C Cedrone; S Gandolfi; N Orzalesi; C Nucci; L Rossetti; A Azuara-Blanco; A Bagnis; R Hitchings; J F Salmon; G Bricola; P M Buchholz; S V Kotak; L M Katz; L R Siegartel; J J Doyle
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Prevalence of glaucoma and intraocular pressure distribution in a defined population. The Egna-Neumarkt Study.

Authors:  L Bonomi; G Marchini; M Marraffa; P Bernardi; I De Franco; S Perfetti; A Varotto; V Tenna
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  A Sommer; J M Tielsch; J Katz; H A Quigley; J D Gottsch; J Javitt; K Singh
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08

10.  Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements.

Authors:  Andreas G Boehm; Anja Weber; Lutz E Pillunat; Rainer Koch; Eberhard Spoerl
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Forms of anesthesia in ophthalmology].

Authors:  Marc Schargus; Veronika Schargus; Stephan Rath
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 1.174

2.  Effects of Cisatracurium, Rocuronium, and Mivacurium on Intraocular Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia in Ophthalmic Surgery.

Authors:  Fang Tan; Wenxian Li; Shuangshuang Li; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.162

3.  Changes in intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude of rhesus macaques after blue light scleral cross-linking.

Authors:  Chong Liu; Yu Li; Mengmeng Wang; Jing Li; Ningli Wang; Fengju Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.