Literature DB >> 25506501

An Automatic Approach for Satisfying Dose-Volume Constraints in Linear Fluence Map Optimization for IMPT.

Maryam Zaghian1, Gino Lim1, Wei Liu2, Radhe Mohan3.   

Abstract

Prescriptions for radiation therapy are given in terms of dose-volume constraints (DVCs). Solving the fluence map optimization (FMO) problem while satisfying DVCs often requires a tedious trial-and-error for selecting appropriate dose control parameters on various organs. In this paper, we propose an iterative approach to satisfy DVCs using a multi-objective linear programming (LP) model for solving beamlet intensities. This algorithm, starting from arbitrary initial parameter values, gradually updates the values through an iterative solution process toward optimal solution. This method finds appropriate parameter values through the trade-off between OAR sparing and target coverage to improve the solution. We compared the plan quality and the satisfaction of the DVCs by the proposed algorithm with two nonlinear approaches: a nonlinear FMO model solved by using the L-BFGS algorithm and another approach solved by a commercial treatment planning system (Eclipse 8.9). We retrospectively selected from our institutional database five patients with lung cancer and one patient with prostate cancer for this study. Numerical results show that our approach successfully improved target coverage to meet the DVCs, while trying to keep corresponding OAR DVCs satisfied. The LBFGS algorithm for solving the nonlinear FMO model successfully satisfied the DVCs in three out of five test cases. However, there is no recourse in the nonlinear FMO model for correcting unsatisfied DVCs other than manually changing some parameter values through trial and error to derive a solution that more closely meets the DVC requirements. The LP-based heuristic algorithm outperformed the current treatment planning system in terms of DVC satisfaction. A major strength of the LP-based heuristic approach is that it is not sensitive to the starting condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-Volume Constraint (DVC); Fluence Map Optimization (FMO); Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT); Linear Programming (LP); Nonlinear Programming (NLP)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25506501      PMCID: PMC4261934          DOI: 10.4236/jct.2014.52025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Ther        ISSN: 2151-1934


  17 in total

1.  Algorithms and functionality of an intensity modulated radiotherapy optimization system.

Authors:  Q Wu; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning.

Authors:  L Xing; J G Li; S Donaldson; Q T Le; A L Boyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning.

Authors:  H Edwin Romeijn; Ravindra K Ahuja; James F Dempsey; Arvind Kumar; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Multiple local minima in IMRT optimization based on dose-volume criteria.

Authors:  Qiuwen Wu; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Optimization of intensity modulated beams with volume constraints using two methods: cost function minimization and projections onto convex sets.

Authors:  P S Cho; S Lee; R J Marks; S Oh; S G Sutlief; M H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Fluence map optimization (FMO) with dose-volume constraints in IMRT using the geometric distance sorting method.

Authors:  Yihua Lan; Cunhua Li; Haozheng Ren; Yong Zhang; Zhifang Min
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Large scale optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions.

Authors:  M Langer; R Brown; M Urie; J Leong; M Stracher; J Shapiro
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions.

Authors:  M Langer; J Leong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Beyond Gaussians: a study of single-spot modeling for scanning proton dose calculation.

Authors:  Yupeng Li; Ronald X Zhu; Narayan Sahoo; Aman Anand; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  3 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Shan; Yunze Yang; Steven E Schild; Thomas B Daniels; William W Wong; Mirek Fatyga; Martin Bues; Terence T Sio; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Mixed integer programming with dose-volume constraints in intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Pengfei Zhang; Neng Fan; Jie Shan; Steven E Schild; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.

Authors:  Maryam Zaghian; Wenhua Cao; Wei Liu; Laleh Kardar; Sharmalee Randeniya; Radhe Mohan; Gino Lim
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.