Literature DB >> 10533926

Optimization of importance factors in inverse planning.

L Xing1, J G Li, S Donaldson, Q T Le, A L Boyer.   

Abstract

Inverse treatment planning starts with a treatment objective and obtains the solution by optimizing an objective function. The clinical objectives are usually multifaceted and potentially incompatible with one another. A set of importance factors is often incorporated in the objective function to parametrize trade-off strategies and to prioritize the dose conformality in different anatomical structures. Whereas the general formalism remains the same, different sets of importance factors characterize plans of obviously different flavour and thus critically determine the final plan. Up to now, the determination of these parameters has been a 'guessing' game based on empirical knowledge because the final dose distribution depends on the parameters in a complex and implicit way. The influence of these parameters is not known until the plan optimization is completed. In order to compromise properly the conflicting requirements of the target and sensitive structures, the parameters are usually adjusted through a trial-and-error process. In this paper, a method to estimate these parameters computationally is proposed and an iterative computer algorithm is described to determine these parameters numerically. The treatment plan selection is done in two steps. First, a set of importance factors are chosen and the corresponding beam parameters (e.g. beam profiles) are optimized under the guidance of a quadratic objective function using an iterative algorithm reported earlier. The 'optimal' plan is then evaluated by an additional scoring function. The importance factors in the objective function are accordingly adjusted to improve the ranking of the plan. For every change in the importance factors, the beam parameters need to be re-optimized. This process continues in an iterative fashion until the scoring function is saturated. The algorithm was applied to two clinical cases and the results demonstrated that it has the potential to improve significantly the existing method of inverse planning. It was noticed that near the final solution the plan became insensitive to small variations of the importance factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10533926     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

1.  A fast optimization algorithm for multicriteria intensity modulated proton therapy planning.

Authors:  Wei Chen; David Craft; Thomas M Madden; Kewu Zhang; Hanne M Kooy; Gabor T Herman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Toward truly optimal IMRT dose distribution: inverse planning with voxel-specific penalty.

Authors:  Pavel Lougovski; Jordan LeNoach; Lei Zhu; Yunzhi Ma; Yair Censor; Lei Xing
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-12

3.  Four-dimensional inverse treatment planning with inclusion of implanted fiducials in IMRT segmented fields.

Authors:  Yunzhi Ma; Louis Lee; O Keshet; Paul Keall; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Inverse planning for IMRT with nonuniform beam profiles using total-variation regularization (TVR).

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Lei Zhu; Tae-Suk Suh; Sarah Geneser; Bowen Meng; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Intelligent inverse treatment planning via deep reinforcement learning, a proof-of-principle study in high dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Yesenia Gonzalez; Peter Klages; Nan Qin; Hyunuk Jung; Liyuan Chen; Dan Nguyen; Steve B Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Closing the Gap Between Deep Neural Network Modeling and Biomedical Decision-Making Metrics in Segmentation via Adaptive Loss Functions.

Authors:  Hyunseok Seo; Maxime Bassenne; Lei Xing
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  The minimum knowledge base for predicting organ-at-risk dose-volume levels and plan-related complications in IMRT planning.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Robert R Meyer; Leyuan Shi; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Automated intensity modulated treatment planning: The expedited constrained hierarchical optimization (ECHO) system.

Authors:  Masoud Zarepisheh; Linda Hong; Ying Zhou; Jung Hun Oh; James G Mechalakos; Margie A Hunt; Gig S Mageras; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Reduced-order constrained optimization in IMRT planning.

Authors:  Renzhi Lu; Richard J Radke; Jie Yang; Laura Happersett; Ellen Yorke; Andrew Jackson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Modeling plan-related clinical complications using machine learning tools in a multiplan IMRT framework.

Authors:  Hao H Zhang; Warren D D'Souza; Leyuan Shi; Robert R Meyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.