Literature DB >> 25505324

Utility-based early modulation of processing distracting stimulus information.

Mike Wendt1, Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez2, Thomas Jacobsen2.   

Abstract

Humans are selective information processors who efficiently prevent goal-inappropriate stimulus information to gain control over their actions. Nonetheless, stimuli, which are both unnecessary for solving a current task and liable to cue an incorrect response (i.e., "distractors"), frequently modulate task performance, even when consistently paired with a physical feature that makes them easily discernible from target stimuli. Current models of cognitive control assume adjustment of the processing of distractor information based on the overall distractor utility (e.g., predictive value regarding the appropriate response, likelihood to elicit conflict with target processing). Although studies on distractor interference have supported the notion of utility-based processing adjustment, previous evidence is inconclusive regarding the specificity of this adjustment for distractor information and the stage(s) of processing affected. To assess the processing of distractors during sensory-perceptual phases we applied EEG recording in a stimulus identification task, involving successive distractor-target presentation, and manipulated the overall distractor utility. Behavioral measures replicated previously found utility modulations of distractor interference. Crucially, distractor-evoked visual potentials (i.e., posterior N1) were more pronounced in high-utility than low-utility conditions. This effect generalized to distractors unrelated to the utility manipulation, providing evidence for item-unspecific adjustment of early distractor processing to the experienced utility of distractor information.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3416720-06$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conflict adaptation; contingency learning; early selection; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25505324      PMCID: PMC6608496          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0754-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  16 in total

1.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.

Authors:  E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Edward Vogel; Geoffrey Woodman; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.

Authors:  Robert D Melara; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-12

6.  Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict.

Authors:  Bruce D Bartholow; Melanie A Pearson; Cheryl L Dickter; Kenneth J Sher; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-06       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Eduardo Madrid; Pío Tudela
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The flexibility of context-specific control: evidence for context-driven generalization of item-specific control settings.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.

Authors:  Carin M Tillman; Stefan Wiens
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  4 in total

1.  The time course of distractor-based response activation with predictable and unpredictable target onset.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Andreas Löw; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-02-02

2.  Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.

Authors:  Miriam Tomat; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Michael Sprengel; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-06

3.  Insula Demonstrates a Non-Linear Response to Varying Demand for Cognitive Control and Weaker Resting Connectivity With the Executive Control Network in Smokers.

Authors:  John R Fedota; Allison L Matous; Betty Jo Salmeron; Hong Gu; Thomas J Ross; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Adoption of Task-Specific Sets of Visual Attention.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Svantje T Kähler; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.