Literature DB >> 21457276

Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.

Carin M Tillman1, Stefan Wiens.   

Abstract

We investigated effects of different proportions of incongruent trials on behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) interference measures associated with response conflict in the Stroop and flanker task. From the literature, we hypothesized that response conflict is greater when incongruent trials are rare compared to when incongruent trials are frequent. In support, the behavioral results on both tasks and the ERP results on the Stroop task (N450) showed that interference effects were significantly larger when incongruent trials were rare than frequent. In contrast, the ERP results on the flanker task N200 showed a larger interference effect when incongruent trials were frequent than rare. Because results for the flanker N200 were opposite to behavioral effects and theoretical predictions, our findings challenge the notion of the flanker N200 as a valid index of response conflict.
Copyright © 2011 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457276     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01203.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  45 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  Clarifying the relationship between mindfulness and executive attention: a combined behavioral and neurophysiological study.

Authors:  Yanli Lin; Megan E Fisher; Jason S Moser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of inhibition: cognitive control, source localization and age-related modulations.

Authors:  Luís Pires; José Leitão; Chiara Guerrini; Mário R Simões
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Utility-based early modulation of processing distracting stimulus information.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study.

Authors:  B Rauchbauer; C Lorenz; C Lamm; D M Pfabigan
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Spatiotemporal oscillatory dynamics of visual selective attention during a flanker task.

Authors:  Timothy J McDermott; Alex I Wiesman; Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  When the rules are reversed: action-monitoring consequences of reversing stimulus-response mappings.

Authors:  Hans S Schroder; Tim P Moran; Jason S Moser; Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.

Authors:  Cameron C McKay; Berry van den Berg; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The dynamics of proactive and reactive cognitive control processes in the human brain.

Authors:  L Gregory Appelbaum; C Nicolas Boehler; Lauren A Davis; Robert J Won; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Cognitive control and midline theta adjust across multiple timescales.

Authors:  Lisa K Chinn; Carolyn S Pauker; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.