Literature DB >> 25503901

Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss.

J Derks1, J Håkansson2, J L Wennström2, C Tomasi2, M Larsson2, T Berglundh2.   

Abstract

Treatment outcomes in implant dentistry have been mainly assessed as implant survival rates in small, selected patient groups of specialist or university clinical settings. This study reports on loss of dental implants assessed in a large and randomly selected patient sample. The results were aimed at representing evaluation of effectiveness of implant dentistry. Using the national data register of the Swedish Social Insurance Agency, 4,716 patients were randomly selected. All had been provided with implant-supported restorative therapy in 2003. Patient files of 2,765 patients (11,311 implants) were collected from more than 800 clinicians. Information on patients, treatment procedures, and outcomes related to the implant-supported restorative therapy was extracted from the files. In total, 596 of the 2,765 subjects, provided with 2,367 implants, attended a clinical examination 9 y after therapy. Implant loss that occurred prior to connection of the supraconstruction was scored as an early implant loss, while later occurring loss was considered late implant loss. Early implant loss occurred in 4.4% of patients (1.4% of implants), while 4.2% of the patients who were examined 9 y after therapy presented with late implant loss (2.0% of implants). Overall, 7.6% of the patients had lost at least 1 implant. Multilevel analysis revealed higher odds ratios for early implant loss among smokers and patients with an initial diagnosis of periodontitis. Implants shorter than 10 mm and representing certain brands also showed higher odds ratios for early implant loss. Implant brand also influenced late implant loss. Implant loss is not an uncommon event, and patient and implant characteristics influence outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01825772). © International & American Associations for Dental Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse effects; endosseous dental implantation; implant-supported dental prosthesis; multivariate analysis; survival rate; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25503901      PMCID: PMC4541089          DOI: 10.1177/0022034514563077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  15 in total

1.  The alveolar process of the edentulous maxilla in periodontitis and non-periodontitis subjects.

Authors:  Jan Lindhe; Denis Cecchinato; Eriberto A Bressan; Marco Toia; Mauricio G Araújo; Birgitta Liljenberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years.

Authors:  Tord Berglundh; Leif Persson; Björn Klinge
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 3.  Clinical research of peri-implant diseases--quality of reporting, case definitions and methods to study incidence, prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant diseases.

Authors:  Cristiano Tomasi; Jan Derks
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  Clinical research in implant dentistry: study design, reporting and outcome measurements: consensus report of Working Group 2 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology.

Authors:  Maurizio Tonetti; Richard Palmer
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.728

5.  Investigational clinical research in implant dentistry: beyond observational and descriptive studies.

Authors:  T Berglundh; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics at placement of dental implants: a pragmatic multicentre placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Gioacchino Cannizzaro; Paolo Bozzoli; Luigi Checchi; Vittorio Ferri; Stefano Landriani; Michele Leone; Marzio Todisco; Cinzia Torchio; Tiziano Testori; Fabio Galli; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.123

Review 7.  Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Ronald E Jung; Anja Zembic; Bjarni E Pjetursson; Marcel Zwahlen; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Patient-reported outcomes of dental implant therapy in a large randomly selected sample.

Authors:  Jan Derks; Jan Håkansson; Jan L Wennström; Björn Klinge; Tord Berglundh
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Osseointegration in periodontitis susceptible individuals.

Authors:  Denis Cecchinato; Eriberto A Bressan; Marco Toia; Mauricio G Araújo; Birgitta Liljenberg; Jan Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 10.  A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.

Authors:  Bjarni E Pjetursson; Daniel Thoma; Ronald Jung; Marcel Zwahlen; Anja Zembic
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  44 in total

1.  Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Bassir; Karim El Kholy; Chia-Yu Chen; Kyu Ha Lee; Giuseppe Intini
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Careers: The absence of restorative dentistry.

Authors:  R Chauhan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Comparison of heat production and bone architecture changes in the implant site preparation with compressive osteotomes, osseodensification technique, piezoelectric devices, and standard drills: an ex vivo study on porcine ribs.

Authors:  Nishith Bhargava; Vittoria Perrotti; Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio; Victor Haruo Matsubara; Diana Patalwala; Alessandro Quaranta
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Development of a new preclinical model to study early implant loss: a validation study in the beagle dog.

Authors:  Antonio Liñares; Raul Verdeja; Benjamin Pippenger; Fernando Muñoz; Mónica López-Peña; Juan Blanco
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis of Biologic and Prosthetic Complications Associated With Single-Tooth Endosseous Dental Implants: Practical Applications.

Authors:  Maninder Kaur; Ramzi V Abou-Arraj; Chee Paul Lin; Maria L Geisinger; Nicolaas C Geurs
Journal:  Clin Adv Periodontics       Date:  2021-04-16

6.  Comparison of decontamination efficacy of two electrolyte cleaning methods to diode laser, plasma, and air-abrasive devices.

Authors:  Holger Zipprich; Paul Weigl; Riccardo Di Gianfilippo; Larissa Steigmann; Dirk Henrich; Hom-Lay Wang; Markus Schlee; Christoph Ratka
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The effect of a single injection of uniform-sized insulin-loaded PLGA microspheres on peri-implant bone formation.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Lu Wang; Feng Qi; Jing Zhao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Retrospective analysis of 10,000 implants from insertion up to 20 years-analysis of implantations using augmentative procedures.

Authors:  Wolfram Knöfler; Thomas Barth; Reinhard Graul; Dietmar Krampe
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-12-03

Review 9.  Non-Surgical Therapy for Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fernando Suárez-López Del Amo; Shan-Huey Yu; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

10.  Small-diameter titanium grade IV and titanium-zirconium implants in edentulous mandibles: five-year results from a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Frauke Müller; Bilal Al-Nawas; Stefano Storelli; Marc Quirynen; Stefan Hicklin; Jose Castro-Laza; Renzo Bassetti; Martin Schimmel
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.