Literature DB >> 12787220

A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years.

Tord Berglundh1, Leif Persson, Björn Klinge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant therapy reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years.
METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted for prospective longitudinal studies with follow-up periods of at least 5 years. Screening and data abstraction were performed independently by multiple reviewers. The types of complications assessed were as follows: implant loss, sensory disturbance, soft tissue complications, peri-implantitis, bone loss >or=2.5 mm, implant fracture and technical complications related to implant components and suprastructures.
RESULTS: The search provided 1310 titles and abstracts, out of which 159 were selected for full-text analysis. Finally, 51 studies were included. Meta analysis of these studies indicated that implant loss prior to functional loading is to be expected to occur in about 2.5% of all implants placed in implant therapy including more than one implant and when routine procedures are used. Implant loss during function occurs in about 2-3% of implants supporting fixed reconstructions, while in overdenture therapy >5% of the implants can be expected to be lost during a 5-year period. Few studies (41% of those included) reported data on the incidence of persisting sensory disturbance >1 year following implant surgery. Most of the studies that provided such data reported on the absence or a low incidence (1-2%) of this complication beyond this interval. A higher incidence of soft tissue complications was reported for patients treated with implants supporting overdentures. There is limited information regarding the occurrence of peri-implantitis and implants exhibiting bone loss >or=2.5 mm. Implant fracture is a rare complication and occurs in <1% of all implants during a 5-year period. The incidence of technical complications related to implant components and suprastructures was higher in overdentures than in fixed reconstructions.
CONCLUSION: Implant loss was most frequently described (reported in about 100% of studies), while biological complications were considered in only 40-60% and technical complications in only 60-80% of the studies. This observation indicates that data on the incidence of biological and technical complications may be underestimated and should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12787220     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.12.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  131 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants.

Authors:  Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Paul Coulthard; Helen V Worthington; Peter George; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

2.  The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the scanning electron microscopic structure and surface roughness of various implant surfaces: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Seung-Il Shin; Hyung-Ki Min; Bo-Hyun Park; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Joon-Bong Park; Yeek Herr; Seong-Joo Heo; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Managing prosthetic complication in implant-retained overdenture.

Authors:  Navneet Dhillon; S K Roy Chowdhury; Prashant Kumar; Rahul Menon
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-02-23

Review 4.  Laser wavelengths and oral implantology.

Authors:  George E Romanos; Norbert Gutknecht; Sandra Dieter; Frank Schwarz; Roberto Crespi; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Investigational clinical research in implant dentistry: beyond observational and descriptive studies.

Authors:  T Berglundh; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 6.  Bone level changes around platform switching and platform matching implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  M DI Girolamo; R Calcaterra; R DI Gianfilippo; C Arcuri; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

7.  Meta-analysis of the association between common interleukin-1 polymorphisms and dental implant failure.

Authors:  Jian Liao; Chao Li; Yong Wang; MinHua Ten; Xu Sun; Ai Tian; Qi Zhang; Xing Liang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  A review of implant provision for hypodontia patients within a Scottish referral centre.

Authors:  B Burns; V Grieg; V Bissell; L Savarrio
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: a systematic approach.

Authors:  Antoine Popelut; Fabien Valet; Olivier Fromentin; Aurélie Thomas; Philippe Bouchard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation.

Authors:  Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.