Literature DB >> 23062125

A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.

Bjarni E Pjetursson1, Daniel Thoma, Ronald Jung, Marcel Zwahlen, Anja Zembic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the 5- and 10-year survival of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and to describe the incidence of biological and technical complications.
METHODS: An electronic Medline search complemented by manual searching was conducted to identify prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series on FDPs with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years. Patients had to have been examined clinically at the follow-up visit. Failure and complication rates were analyzed using standard and random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates of 5-year and 10-year survival and complication rates.
RESULTS: The updated search provided 979 titles and 257 abstracts. Full-text analysis was performed for 90 articles resulting in a total 32 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of these studies indicated an estimated survival of implants supporting FDPs of 95.6% after 5 years and 93.1% after 10 years. When machined surface implants were excluded from the analysis and only rough surface implants included, the survival rate increased to 97.2% after 5 years. The survival rate of implant-supported FDPs was 95.4% after 5 years and 80.1% after 10 years of function. When the analysis was done exclusively for metal-ceramic FDPs, hence the old gold-acrylic FDPs were excluded, the survival rate increased significantly. The survival rate of metal-ceramic implant-supported FDPs was 96.4% after 5 years and 93.9% after 10 years. Only 66.4% of the patients were free of any complications after 5 years. The most frequent complications over the 5-year observation period were fractures of the veneering material (13.5%), peri-implantitis and soft tissue complications (8.5%), loss of access hole restoration (5.4%), abutment or screw loosening (5.3%), and loss of retention of cemented FDPs (4.7%).
CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) are a safe and predictable treatment method with high survival rates. However, biological and technical complications were frequent (33.6%). To minimize the incidence of complications, dental professionals should make great effort in choosing reliable components and materials for implant-supported FDPs and the patients should be placed in well-structured maintenance system after treatment.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23062125     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  113 in total

Review 1.  Genetic networks in osseointegration.

Authors:  I Nishimura
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Treatment planning the endodontic-implant interface.

Authors:  W P Saunders
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  Peri-implantitis. Part 1: Scope of the problem.

Authors:  A Alani; M Kelleher; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Dental implants in medically complex patients-a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yifat Manor; Roy Simon; Doron Haim; Adi Garfunkel; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Survey of consultants in restorative dentistry in the UK regarding ongoing care of patients provided with dental implants.

Authors:  H P Beddis; K A Durey; M F W Y Chan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 6.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of osseointegrated implant failure: a cohort study.

Authors:  X Wu; K Al-Abedalla; E Rastikerdar; S Abi Nader; N G Daniel; B Nicolau; F Tamimi
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 8.  Removal of osseointegrated dental implants: a systematic review of explantation techniques.

Authors:  Margaux Roy; Lucie Loutan; Giovanni Garavaglia; Dena Hashim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Is It Necessary to Perform the Pharmacological Interventions for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy? A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Jie Zhou; Sheng Zhang; Xu-Lin Wang; Yu-Long Jia; Shu He; Yuan-Yuan Wang; Wen-Chao Li; Jian-Guo Shao; Xun Zhuang; Yuan-Lin Liu; Gang Qin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years.

Authors:  Paulo Maló; Miguel de Araújo Nobre; Armando Lopes; Steven Moss
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.