Literature DB >> 25501676

Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.

Nicolas Chambon1, Nicolas Delattre, Nils Guéguen, Eric Berton, Guillaume Rao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimalist running shoes are designed to induce a foot strike made more with the forepart of the foot. The main changes made on minimalist shoe consist in decreasing the height difference between fore and rear parts of the sole (drop). Barefoot and shod running have been widely compared on overground or treadmill these last years, but the key characteristic effects of minimalist shoes have been yet little studied. The purpose of this study is to find whether the shoe drop has the same effect regardless of the task: overground or treadmill running.
METHODS: Twelve healthy male subjects ran with three shoes of different drops (0, 4, 8 mm) and barefoot on a treadmill and overground. Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) (transient peak and loading rate) and lower limb kinematics (foot, ankle and knee joint flexion angles) were observed.
RESULTS: Opposite footwear effects on loading rate between the tasks were observed. Barefoot running induced higher loading rates during overground running than the highest drop condition, while it was the opposite during treadmill running. Ankle plantar flexion and knee flexion angles at touchdown were higher during treadmill than overground running for all conditions, except for barefoot which did not show any difference between the tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: Shoe drop appears to be a key parameter influencing running pattern, but its effects on vGRF differ depending on the task (treadmill vs. overground running) and must be considered with caution. Unlike shod conditions, kinematics of barefoot condition was not altered by treadmill running explaining opposite conclusions between the tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25501676     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-3072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  28 in total

1.  Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking.

Authors:  J B Dingwell; J P Cusumano; P R Cavanagh; D Sternad
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  A kinematic method for footstrike pattern detection in barefoot and shod runners.

Authors:  Allison R Altman; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect?

Authors:  C Divert; G Mornieux; P Freychat; L Baly; F Mayer; A Belli
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Effect of time during a running session with minimal footwear.

Authors:  N Delattre; N Chambon; E Berton; N Gueguen; G Rao
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Biomechanical and anatomic factors associated with a history of plantar fasciitis in female runners.

Authors:  Michael B Pohl; Joseph Hamill; Irene S Davis
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  Evaluation of lower extremity overuse injury potential in runners.

Authors:  A Hreljac; R N Marshall; P A Hume
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Comparing methods of quantifying tibial acceleration slope.

Authors:  Adriana M Duquette; David M Andrews
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Landing pattern and vertical loading rates during first attempt of barefoot running in habitual shod runners.

Authors:  Roy T H Cheung; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Effects of footwear on treadmill running biomechanics in preadolescent children.

Authors:  Karsten Hollander; Dieko Riebe; Sebastian Campe; Klaus-Michael Braumann; Astrid Zech
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?

Authors:  Yo Shih; Kuan-Lun Lin; Tzyy-Yuang Shiang
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Does an increase in energy return and/or longitudinal bending stiffness shoe features reduce the energetic cost of running?

Authors:  Nicolas Flores; Nicolas Delattre; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Wing-Kai Lam; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

4.  Effect of the Innovative Running Shoes With the Special Midsole Structure on the Female Runners' Lower Limb Biomechanics.

Authors:  Fengqin Fu; Lianming Guo; Xunfei Tang; Jiayu Wang; Zhihao Xie; Gusztáv Fekete; Yuhui Cai; Qiuli Hu; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  Muscle Activity of the Triceps Surae With Novel Propulsion Heel-Lift Orthotics in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Rubén Sánchez-Gómez; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo; Carlos Romero Morales; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; Aitor Castrillo de la Fuente; Daniel López-López; Ignacio Díez Vega; César Calvo-Lobo
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-10-16

6.  Differences and mechanisms underpinning a change in the knee flexion moment while running in stability and neutral footwear among young females.

Authors:  Timothy A Sayer; Rana S Hinman; Kade L Paterson; Kim L Bennell; Karine Fortin; J Kasza; Adam L Bryant
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  Is Motorized Treadmill Running Biomechanically Comparable to Overground Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cross-Over Studies.

Authors:  Bas Van Hooren; Joel T Fuller; Jonathan D Buckley; Jayme R Miller; Kerry Sewell; Guillaume Rao; Christian Barton; Chris Bishop; Richard W Willy
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Implications of sample size and acquired number of steps to investigate running biomechanics.

Authors:  Anderson Souza Oliveira; Cristina Ioana Pirscoveanu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A Re-examination of the Measurement of Foot Strike Mechanics During Running: The Immediate Effect of Footwear Midsole Thickness.

Authors:  Zhenyuan Zhang; Mark Lake
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-26

10.  Running Propensities of Athletes with Hamstring Injuries.

Authors:  Dai Sugimoto; Brian D Kelly; David L Mandel; Duncan A d'Hemecourt; Sara C Carpenito; Charles A d'Hemecourt; Pierre A d'Hemecourt
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.