Literature DB >> 32132824

Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Xiaole Sun1, Wing-Kai Lam2,3, Xini Zhang1, Junqing Wang1, Weijie Fu1,4.   

Abstract

Although the role of shoe constructions on running injury and performance has been widely investigated, systematic reviews on the shoe construction effects on running biomechanics were rarely reported. Therefore, this review focuses on the relevant research studies examining the biomechanical effect of running shoe constructions on reducing running-related injury and optimising performance. Searches of five databases and Footwear Science from January 1994 to September 2018 for related biomechanical studies which investigated running footwear constructions yielded a total of 1260 articles. After duplications were removed and exclusion criteria applied to the titles, abstracts and full text, 63 studies remained and categorised into following constructions: (a) shoe lace, (b) midsole, (c) heel flare, (d) heel-toe drop, (e) minimalist shoes, (f) Masai Barefoot Technologies, (g) heel cup, (h) upper, and (i) bending stiffness. Some running shoe constructions positively affect athletic performance-related and injury-related variables: 1) increasing the stiffness of running shoes at the optimal range can benefit performance-related variables; 2) softer midsoles can reduce impact forces and loading rates; 3) thicker midsoles can provide better cushioning effects and attenuate shock during impacts but may also decrease plantar sensations of a foot; 4) minimalist shoes can improve running economy and increase the cross-sectional area and stiffness of Achilles tendon but it would increase the metatarsophalangeal and ankle joint loading compared to the conventional shoes. While shoe constructions can effectively influence running biomechanics, research on some constructions including shoe lace, heel flare, heel-toe drop, Masai Barefoot Technologies, heel cup, and upper requires further investigation before a viable scientific guideline can be made. Future research is also needed to develop standard testing protocols to determine the optimal stiffness, thickness, and heel-toe drop of running shoes to optimise performance-related variables and prevent running-related injuries. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Running shoes; bending stiffness; comfort perception; cushioning; impact force

Year:  2020        PMID: 32132824      PMCID: PMC7039038     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  71 in total

1.  Foot landmarking for footwear customization.

Authors:  Ameersing Luximon; Ravindra S Goonetilleke; Kwok L Tsui
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Altering muscle activity in the lower extremities by running with different shoes.

Authors:  James M Wakeling; Silvia A Pascual; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre R Roy; Darren J Stefanyshyn
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Examining injury risk and pain perception in runners using minimalist footwear.

Authors:  Michael Ryan; Maha Elashi; Richard Newsham-West; Jack Taunton
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Does maximalist footwear lower impact loading during level ground and downhill running?

Authors:  Zoe Y S Chan; Ivan P H Au; Fannie O Y Lau; Eric C K Ching; Janet H Zhang; Roy T H Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  Four-week habituation to simulated barefoot running improves running economy when compared with shod running.

Authors:  J P Warne; G D Warrington
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Injuries observed in minimalist runners.

Authors:  Matthew J Salzler; Eric M Bluman; Samantha Noonan; Christopher P Chiodo; Richard J de Asla
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Midsole thickness affects running patterns in habitual rearfoot strikers during a sustained run.

Authors:  Trampas M TenBroek; Pedro A Rodrigues; Edward C Frederick; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  The influence of minimalist footwear and stride length reduction on lower-extremity running mechanics and cumulative loading.

Authors:  Colin R Firminger; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.319

10.  The Influence of Minimalist and Maximalist Footwear on Patellofemoral Kinetics During Running.

Authors:  Jonathan Sinclair; Jim Richards; James Selfe; James Fau-Goodwin; Hannah Shore
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 1.833

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Justin A Ortega; Laura A Healey; Wannes Swinnen; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The effect of shoe cushioning on gait and balance in females with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Andrew S Monaghan; Patrick G Monaghan; Sutton B Richmond; Jamie A Roper; Brett W Fling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Recent Improvements in Marathon Run Times Are Likely Technological, Not Physiological.

Authors:  Borja Muniz-Pardos; Shaun Sutehall; Konstantinos Angeloudis; Fergus M Guppy; Andrew Bosch; Yannis Pitsiladis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Effectiveness of Insole Colour on Impact Loading and Lower-Limb Kinematics When Running at Preferred and Nonpreferred Speeds.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Wing-Kai Lam; Lok-Yee Pak; Charis K-W Wong; Mohammad F Tan; Aaron K-L Leung
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Author's Reply to González-Mohíno et al. "A Pragmatic Approach to Resolving Technological Unfairness: The Case of Nike's Vaporfly and Alphafly Running Footwear".

Authors:  Bryce Dyer
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2021-12-17

6.  The performance of body mass component indices in detecting risk of musculoskeletal injuries in physically active young men and women.

Authors:  Jarosław Domaradzki; Dawid Koźlenia
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.

Authors:  Cristine Agresta; Christina Giacomazzi; Mark Harrast; Jessica Zendler
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-09

8.  Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly Shoes.

Authors:  Laura A Healey; Wouter Hoogkamer
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 13.077

9.  Non-South East Asians have a better running economy and different anthropometrics and biomechanics than South East Asians.

Authors:  Aurélien Patoz; Thibault Lussiana; Bastiaan Breine; Cyrille Gindre; Laurent Mourot; Kim Hébert-Losier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  A Re-examination of the Measurement of Foot Strike Mechanics During Running: The Immediate Effect of Footwear Midsole Thickness.

Authors:  Zhenyuan Zhang; Mark Lake
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.