Literature DB >> 24556474

Landing pattern and vertical loading rates during first attempt of barefoot running in habitual shod runners.

Roy T H Cheung1, Michael J Rainbow2.   

Abstract

There is evidence supporting that habitual barefoot runners are able to disperse impact loading rates by landing pattern modification. Yet, case studies suggested that barefoot running may result in severe running injuries, such as metatarsal and calcaneal stress fractures. Injuries may be due to a difference in biomechanical response between habitual and novice barefoot runners. This study investigated the initial effects of barefoot running in habitual shod runners in terms of landing pattern modification and vertical loading rates. Thirty habitual shod runners (mean age 25.5±5.2years; 18 men; with a minimum running mileage of 30km per week for at least one year) ran on an instrumented treadmill at 10km/h shod and barefoot in a randomized order. Vertical average (VALR) and instantaneous loading rates (VILR) were obtained by established methods. Landing pattern was presented as a ratio between the number of footfalls with a heelstrike and the total step number. Twenty participants demonstrated an automatic transition to a non-heelstrike landing during barefoot running, whereas a mixed landing pattern was observed in 10 participants. Compared to shod running, both VALR and VILR were significantly reduced during barefoot running (p<.021). In the subgroup analysis, VALR for the shod condition was significantly higher than barefoot running, regardless of the landing pattern. VALR for the non-heelstrike pattern during barefoot running was significantly lower than participants with a mixed landing pattern. Conversely, we observed two participants who completely altered their landing patterns, presented high VALR and VILR values. Habitual shod runners presented lower loading rates during barefoot running but their landing pattern transitions were not uniform. Novice barefoot runners with a mixed landing pattern may sustain higher loading rates, compared with those who completely avoided heelstrike pattern. However, a complete landing pattern modification may not guarantee lower loading rates.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kinetics; Minimalist; Shoe; Transition

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24556474     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  11 in total

1.  Lower extremity biomechanical relationships with different speeds in traditional, minimalist, and barefoot footwear.

Authors:  William Fredericks; Seth Swank; Madeline Teisberg; Bethany Hampton; Lance Ridpath; Jandy B Hanna
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.

Authors:  Nicolas Chambon; Nicolas Delattre; Nils Guéguen; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Biomechanical Analysis of Running Foot Strike in Shoes of Different Mass.

Authors:  I-Lin Wang; Ryan B Graham; Eric J P Bourdon; Yi-Ming Chen; Chin-Yi Gu; Li-I Wang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Meizi Wang; Jan Awrejcewicz; Gusztáv Fekete; Feng Ren; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Impact Sound Across Rearfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot Strike During Overground Running.

Authors:  Ivan Pui Hung Au; Leo Ng; Paul Davey; Marco So; Brian Chan; Pinky Li; Will Wong; Tania Althorpe; Sarah Michelle Stearne; Roy Cheung
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Foot Morphological Difference between Habitually Shod and Unshod Runners.

Authors:  Yang Shu; Qichang Mei; Justin Fernandez; Zhiyong Li; Neng Feng; Yaodong Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  16 Weeks of Progressive Barefoot Running Training Changes Impact Force and Muscle Activation in Habitual Shod Runners.

Authors:  Ana Paula da Silva Azevedo; Bruno Mezêncio; Alberto Carlos Amadio; Julio Cerca Serrão
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Modulations of Foot and Ankle Frontal Kinematics for Breaking and Propulsive Movement Characteristics during Side-Step Cutting with Varying Midsole Thicknesses.

Authors:  Yi-Jia Lin; Shih-Chi Lee; Chao-Chin Chang; Tsung-Han Liu; Tzyy-Yuang Shiang; Wei-Chun Hsu
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.781

9.  Effects of Surface Inclination on the Vertical Loading Rates and Landing Pattern during the First Attempt of Barefoot Running in Habitual Shod Runners.

Authors:  W An; M J Rainbow; R T H Cheung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Lower Extremity Joint Kinematics of Shod, Barefoot, and Simulated Barefoot Treadmill Running.

Authors:  Michele Leblanc; Heidi Ferkranus
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.