| Literature DB >> 25499870 |
Wilson Campos Tavares1, Ubiratam Brum de Castro, Eduardo Paulino, Leonardo de Souza Vasconcellos, Ana Paula Madureira, Maria Angélica Baron Magalhães, Daniel Victor Moreira Mendes, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Vivian Resende.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could provide valuable findings for tendon regeneration. A non-invasive image method that can effectively evaluate the quality of the scar tissue has not yet been employed.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25499870 PMCID: PMC4269850 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0132-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Figure 1Surgical procedure in the rabbit’s Achilles tendon: resection of the central segment of the tendon.
Figure 2MR images of the rabbit Achilles tendon (white arrow) from the control group 1: (A) T1 axial cut, (B) T2 axial cut with fat saturation, and (C) T2 sagittal cut with fat saturation. Observe the homogeneity of the tendon, which is diffusely hypo-intense.
Figure 3Transversal sections of the rabbit Achilles tendon (AT) in DCE-MRI and histology. Control group (A-C) and operated group (D-F). Contrast enhancement in MIR in both groups corresponds to the red area on map colour with maximal contrast increase inclination. Scarring area in the operated group (yellow arrow (D)) corresponds to the red area on map colour (white arrow (E)) and pointed area on histology in the posterior region of the tendon (black arrow (F)). Details of the scar tissue (G-I), with less organized collagen in (G) (arrow), hypercellularity on the left side compared to the normal tendon on the right (H) and preserved muscle fibres (arrow) between the scar tissue and normal tendon (I) (haematoxylin-eosin stain).
Figure 4MR images of the rabbit Achilles tendon from the surgical group 2: (A) T1 axial cut, (B) T2 axial cut with fat saturation and (C) T2 sagittal cut. Observe the heterogeneity of the tendon, which presents hyper-intense signal focus points in T1 and T2 (arrows).
Figure 5Normal-sized Achilles tendon sheath (arrow) in the control group (A) and considerable widening of the tendon sheath (arrow) in the operated group (B) (haematoxylin-eosin stain).
Figure 6Contrast enhancement curves in the control and surgical groups.
Means ± standard deviation for the antero-posterior and transversal diameter variables of the rabbit Achilles tendons
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| AP (mm) | 4.22 ± 0.57a | 5.53 ± 1.16b |
| T (mm) | 3.32 ± 0.58a | 5.53 ± 1.43b |
Means with different letters (a, b) differ statistically in the Tukey post-test (p < 0.05).
AP antero-posterior diameter, T transversal diameter.