Literature DB >> 16203884

Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Riaz J K Khan1, Dan Fick, Angus Keogh, John Crawford, Tim Brammar, Martyn Parker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the best option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified as operative (open or percutaneous) or nonoperative (casting or functional bracing). Postoperative splinting can be performed with a rigid cast (proximal or distal to the knee) or a more mobile functional brace. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized, controlled trials on the effectiveness of different interventions for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.
METHODS: We searched multiple databases (including EMBASE, CINAHL, and MEDLINE) as well as reference lists of articles and contacted authors. Keywords included Achilles tendon, rupture, and tendon injuries. Three reviewers extracted data and independently assessed trial quality with use of a ten-item scale.
RESULTS: Twelve trials involving 800 patients were included. There was a variable level of methodological rigor and reporting of outcomes. Open operative treatment was associated with a lower risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.64). However, it was associated with a higher risk of other complications, including infection, adhesions, and disturbed skin sensibility (relative risk, 10.60; 95% confidence interval, 4.82 to 23.28). Percutaneous repair was associated with a lower complication rate compared with open operative repair (relative risk, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 7.62). Patients who had been managed with a functional brace postoperatively (allowing for early mobilization) had a lower complication rate compared with those who had been managed with a cast (relative risk, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.76). Because of the small number of patients involved, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different nonoperative treatment regimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Open operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with nonoperative treatment, but operative treatment is associated with a significantly higher risk of other complications. Operative risks may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously. Postoperative splinting with use of a functional brace reduces the overall complication rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16203884     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.03049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  88 in total

1.  Initial stability of two different adhesives compared to suture repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture--a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Johannes Schneppendahl; Simon Thelen; Alberto Schek; Ioana Bala; Mohssen Hakimi; Jan-Peter Grassmann; Christian Eichler; Joachim Windolf; Michael Wild
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Bowei Wang; Anfu Chen; Fu Dong; Bin Yu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Proprioception level after endoscopically guided percutaneous Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Defne Kaya; Mahmut Nedim Doral; John Nyland; Uğur Toprak; Egemen Turhan; Gürhan Donmez; Seyit Citaker; Ozgur Ahmet Atay; Michael J Callaghan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Conservative functional treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures].

Authors:  T Hüfner; R Gaulke; J Imrecke; C Krettek; T Stübig
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Development of an accelerated functional rehabilitation protocol following minimal invasive Achilles tendon repair.

Authors:  Mareen Braunstein; Sebastian F Baumbach; Wolfgang Boecker; Mike R Carmont; Hans Polzer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Resection of infected achilles tendon. Results after soft tissue coverage without tendon reconstruction].

Authors:  P Boorboor; L U Lahoda; M Spies; G Kuether; K Waehling; P M Vogt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Activity level recovery after acute Achilles tendon rupture surgically repaired: a series of 29 patients with a mean follow-up of 46 months.

Authors:  Richard Zayni; Raphaël Coursier; Moudasser Zakaria; Jean-François Desrousseaux; Denis Cordonnier; Gilles Polveche
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

8.  Conservative, minimally invasive and open surgical repair for management of acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon: a clinical and functional retrospective study.

Authors:  Gayle Maffulli; Angelo Del Buono; Paula Richards; Francesco Oliva; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2017-05-10

9.  Locating the sural nerve during calcaneal (Achilles) tendon repair with confidence: a cadaveric study with clinical applications.

Authors:  Joseph A Blackmon; Stavros Atsas; Mackenzie J Clarkson; Jacob N Fox; Blake T Daney; Sean C Dodson; H Wayne Lambert
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.286

10.  Cross cultural adaptation of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score with reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Michael R Carmont; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Katarina Nilsson-Helander; Omer Mei-Dan; Jon Karlsson; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.