Literature DB >> 22405494

Development and evaluation of multiple tendon injury models in the mouse.

David P Beason1, Andrew F Kuntz, Jason E Hsu, Kristin S Miller, Louis J Soslowsky.   

Abstract

The mouse has proven to be an advantageous animal model system in basic science research focused on aiding in development and evaluation of potential treatments; however, the small size of mouse tendons makes consistent and reproducible injury models and subsequent biomechanical evaluation challenging for studying tendon healing. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and reproducibility of multiple mouse tendon injury models. Our hypothesis was that incisional (using a blade) and excisional (using a biopsy punch) injuries would result in consistent differences in tendon material properties. At 16 weeks of age, 17 C57BL/6 mice underwent surgery to create defects in the flexor digitorum longus, Achilles, or patellar tendon. Each animal received 1-2 full-thickness, central-width incisional or excisional injuries per limb; at least one tendon per limb remained uninjured. The injuries were distributed such that each tendon type had comparable numbers of uninjured, incisionally injured, and excisionally injured specimens. Three weeks after injury, all animals were euthanized and tendons were harvested for mechanical testing. As hypothesized, differences were detected for all three different tendon types at three weeks post-injury. While all models created injuries that produced predictable outcomes, the patellar tendon model was the most consistent in terms of number and size of significant differences in injured tendons compared to native properties, as well as in the overall variance in the data. This finding provides support for its use in fundamental tendon healing studies; however, future work may use any of these models, based on their appropriateness for the specific question under study.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22405494      PMCID: PMC3335972          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  2 in total

1.  Tendon healing in interleukin-4 and interleukin-6 knockout mice.

Authors:  Tony W Lin; Luis Cardenas; David L Glaser; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Mouse models of human disease. Part I: techniques and resources for genetic analysis in mice.

Authors:  M A Bedell; N A Jenkins; N G Copeland
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

  2 in total
  36 in total

1.  Cell and Biologic-Based Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries.

Authors:  Stephen W Linderman; Richard H Gelberman; Stavros Thomopoulos; Hua Shen
Journal:  Oper Tech Orthop       Date:  2016-09

2.  Efficacy of various analgesics on shoulder function and rotator cuff tendon-to-bone healing in a rat (Rattus norvegicus) model.

Authors:  Adam C Caro; Jennica J Tucker; Sarah M Yannascoli; Andrew A Dunkman; Stephen J Thomas; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  MRL/MpJ tendon matrix-derived therapeutic promotes improved healing outcomes in scar-mediated canonical tendon healing.

Authors:  Juan Paredes; Ashley Pekmezian; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Tendon healing affects the multiscale mechanical, structural and compositional response of tendon to quasi-static tensile loading.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Ashley B Rodriguez; Cody D Hillin; Stephanie N Weiss; Biao Han; Lin Han; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Tendon Biomechanics and Crimp Properties Following Fatigue Loading Are Influenced by Tendon Type and Age in Mice.

Authors:  Andrey Zuskov; Benjamin R Freedman; Joshua A Gordon; Joseph J Sarver; Mark R Buckley; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Uncorrelated healing response of tendon and ear injuries in MRL highlight a role for the local tendon environment in driving scarless healing.

Authors:  Juan Paredes; David A Shiovitz; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.417

7.  Biomechanical and structural response of healing Achilles tendon to fatigue loading following acute injury.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Joseph J Sarver; Mark R Buckley; Pramod B Voleti; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Mechanisms of tendon injury and repair.

Authors:  Stavros Thomopoulos; William C Parks; Daniel B Rifkin; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Validation of an empirical damage model for aging and in vivo injury of the murine patellar tendon.

Authors:  Mark R Buckley; Andrew A Dunkman; Katherine E Reuther; Akash Kumar; Lydia Pathmanathan; David P Beason; David E Birk; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 10.  Musculoskeletal regeneration and its implications for the treatment of tendinopathy.

Authors:  Jedd B Sereysky; Evan L Flatow; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.